Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
code4libcon
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Code4Lib 2013?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jonathan Rochkind  
View profile  
 More options Jan 31 2012, 12:18 pm
From: Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:18:37 -0500
Local: Tues, Jan 31 2012 12:18 pm
Subject: Re: Code4Lib 2013?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
If they are the only host by the deadline, then there seems to be no
options BUT having them host it!

I actually kind of like that they were the only host -- because I think
it means they can pretty much do WHATEVER they want with the conference
next year, cause it's like, if they didn't, there'd be no conference, so
do what you want with it! It's not like they fooled anyone into voting
for you and then changed the conf on em!

They were the only ones who offered to do the conf, so it was them or no
conf, so I think that gives em some freedom to make some changes to
previous years -- cause it was those changes, or no conf. Want to make
it bigger, want to make it smaller, want to make it entirely different?
I might not personally like some things they could hypothetically do,
but, hey, I don't have to go, and it's not like if they hadn't done em
there would have been the 'usual' conf, there would have been nothing!

So go for it, Chicago folks.

Jonathan

On 1/31/2012 11:57 AM, Peter Murray wrote:

> I would feel more comfortable affirming that if this discussion was taking place on the main Code4Lib list.  Otherwise, I'm fine with C4L2013 in Chicago.

> Peter

> On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote:
>> Just to confirm, y'all: Chicago should start preparations for the 2013
>> conference?

>> I say +1.

>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:58, Becky Yoose<b.yo...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> *Calculates distance between Grinnell and Chicago*

>>> *Output: drivable distance*

>>> *Calculates how many batches of vegan chocolate chip walnut cookies she can
>>> fit in her luggage*

>>> Tea houses +1

>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "code4libcon" group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/code4libcon/-/SNJgVd43gzkJ.

>>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google