Received: by 10.68.132.69 with SMTP id os5mr1402842pbb.6.1330463989222;
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:49 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: code4libcon@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.219.2 with SMTP id pk2ls22965324pbc.5.gmail; Tue, 28 Feb
 2012 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.132.69 with SMTP id os5mr1402829pbb.6.1330463988819;
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.132.69 with SMTP id os5mr1402828pbb.6.1330463988808;
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <higherm...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com (mail-pw0-f41.google.com [209.85.160.41])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p7si11387989pbq.0.2012.02.28.13.19.48
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of higherm...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.41;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of higherm...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=higherm...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by pbcun15 with SMTP id un15so3259886pbc.28
        for <code4libcon@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of higherm...@gmail.com designates 10.68.129.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.129.73;
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.129.73])
        by 10.68.129.73 with SMTP id nu9mr59673053pbb.100.1330463988776 (num_hops = 1);
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        bh=uuNe5jD3q4kQbTmZ3yqPLC5OoiEAs/nHqF2xDoTevr0=;
        b=OCuiQYApgV7iMTx+ZyFszeiHw3m9vEOwAT65es0ba8eGQ7+LxWhhWciNdic68uPdrg
         y2jBCx+8yL30NRaRSxMP4jdkAs0rSB77g2dcoEdM6Ujr2cZ02j/YPddvGTtTP9/eeLqc
         bMk81EKy4z+YTX+8zVo09SfzVokjYEmBcLKWs=
Received: by 10.68.129.73 with SMTP id nu9mr50283630pbb.100.1330463988715;
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <higherm...@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.66.117] (pool-173-55-143-176.lsanca.fios.verizon.net. [173.55.143.176])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x6sm10093927pbu.67.2012.02.28.13.19.46
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:47 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Subject: Re: Conference Tracks
From: Cary Gordon <higherm...@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPBaBj_KaBwv7a7BbVpuvC6PNYrA5fS4ZSLv+79PYr2gqEu...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:19:45 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <22C4DCBE-7165-453D-930E-A66338B17...@gmail.com>
References: <CAMcEtiQv+tNB4OaQcLu3bZtQYxAsyc+coftoZ7GHNxpf-8O...@mail.gmail.com> <4602D4D4-E903-456E-AC3B-E0A61F71C...@gmail.com> <E17F49BD-4422-40B2-B73C-3EE8F6F75...@gmail.com> <CAMcEtiQ=QkkF+TjAX3Qeursar0A6im_d2fFiYuMS--W+yR2...@mail.gmail.com> <9D58AD45-4C49-45C1-A036-5238837FC...@lyrasis.org> <CAMcEtiRx-dHZnQFaaxMzZpMe57ukjPDYrgGgk7uaqb655hU...@mail.gmail.com> <6B808B2E-DF6F-4877-B8AC-205CF05E6...@gmail.com> <CAMcEtiSnijLOpOR441gpkOL2mMCf8CZMoNE42RkYQWSjF7R...@mail.gmail.com> <D3929D34-B1B2-48DF-8124-2C5FA68C7...@lyrasis.org> <CAMcEtiTz0kJn8q2oHM+nod1asHbhPzWCNaZY1SRJb_R2dNB...@mail.gmail.com> <007DF23F-B8A9-497E-8CB0-DDA2DB350...@gmail.com> <CAAtO2NsukHwtX07P87dX_qU5UJLDXOmuCa3q_AAF37g7pVE...@mail.gmail.com> <561FC33E-4983-4AF1-9DA9-3203A5C00...@gmail.com> <CAPBaBj_KaBwv7a7BbVpuvC6PNYrA5fS4ZSLv+79PYr2gqEu...@mail.gmail.com>
To: code4libcon@googlegroups.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)

Code4LibCon 2013 is in the hands of the Chicago team. Everything that we =
suggest requires effort on their part, and, to a substantial degree, =
they own the event and get to make these decisions. While this might =
change down the road, I don't think that it is something that we should =
change or consider changing for the next con.

In that light, I think that it is appropriate that if the Chicago team =
wants to open things to a vote, then they can take this to the list. If =
they want to get a box of stogies, go in a room and lock the door, that =
is their privilege.

At some point before the next Con, but closer to it, I think that we =
should open the general subject of where we want this to go. Meanwhile, =
anyone who wants to discuss it can come here, where the bar never =
closes.

Cary

On Feb 24, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Corey Harper wrote:

> Dear All,
>=20
> I was at Portland, and while it wasn't the greatest setup, it was
> still an excellent conference.
>=20
> Personally, I would happily sit on a stool in a corner--with or
> without a pointy hat--if it meant I could interact with a larger
> number of the people in this growing community.
>=20
> It seems my opinion is in the minority, but I also wonder whether this
> discussion is currently skewed due to it happening on the--much
> smaller--c4lcon list. Perhaps it would be worth dusting off the
> Diebold-o-tron-o-matic & asking what the community at large thinks?
>=20
> -Corey
>=20
> --=20
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google =
Groups "code4libcon" group.
> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to =
code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at =
http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=3Den.
>=20