> Thanks for these responses. In terms of competing sponsorship efforts,
> I mostly proposed a second fund because I didn't want to propose
> diverting money from the scholarship fund, which I consider a very
> laudable thing to do. Personally, I was planning on donating to both
> funds, and apportioning my donation based on what I was most
> interested in supporting, and thought that other contributors might
> want to do the same.

> In terms of how things get spent, perhaps it would be worthwhile to
> have a streaming fund with a note that contributors are ok w/ the
> conference organizing repurposing the money if the goal requisite
> target to enable streaming is not met?

> As to managing this, I'd be more than happy to contribute whatever I
> can to the logistics both beforehand an on-site, with the guidance of
> the local planning committee.

> Finally, I want to thank Mark for the very detailed list of concerns
> and gotya's surfaced by Access' streaming efforts. I know that, in
> addition to c4l11, ELAG11 also had a very successful stream. I'd be
> more than happy to contact organizers of both conferences and ask if
> they have any additional advice if we decide this is worth pursuing
> further.

> Thanks again,
> -Corey