> Did we get any hosting proposals for Code4Lib 2013? The deadline was > 1/22, wasn't it?
> -Mike
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 02:47, Jodi Schneider <jschnei...@pobox.com> wrote: > Deadline extension & a reminder on the call, then? Who's putting proposals > together? (Or are we considering '13 an unlucky, con-free year?) -Jodi
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Michael J. Giarlo > <leftw...@alumni.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> Did we get any hosting proposals for Code4Lib 2013? The deadline was >> 1/22, wasn't it?
>> -Mike
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "code4libcon" group. >> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Jodi Schneider <jschnei...@pobox.com> wrote: > Deadline extension & a reminder on the call, then? Who's putting proposals > together? (Or are we considering '13 an unlucky, con-free year?) -Jodi
Hang on!
We *I* submitted ours two times. I stopped sending/submitting because I noticed there was an embargo placed on new users to the group. I then wrongly assumed all submissions were placed on an embargo to avoid people `photocopying` each other's submission.
Can the admin's check on this? Otherwise please come to Chicago in 2013. Lucky or no.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:09, Francis Kayiwa <francis.kay...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Jodi Schneider <jschnei...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Deadline extension & a reminder on the call, then? Who's putting proposals >> together? (Or are we considering '13 an unlucky, con-free year?) -Jodi
> Hang on!
> We *I* submitted ours two times. I stopped sending/submitting because > I noticed there was an embargo placed on new users to the group. I > then wrongly assumed all submissions were placed on an embargo to > avoid people `photocopying` each other's submission.
> Can the admin's check on this? Otherwise please come to Chicago in > 2013. Lucky or no.
> -- > Past hissy-fits are not a predictor of future hissy-fits --Nick Holland
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
<leftw...@alumni.rutgers.edu> wrote: > Whoops, it looks like your messages have been held for days. GGroups > didn't notify me about the pending messages. Mea culpa!
> I guess we have one proposal for 2013? That makes the voting a bit > more straightforward?
> -Mike
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:09, Francis Kayiwa <francis.kay...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Jodi Schneider <jschnei...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> Deadline extension & a reminder on the call, then? Who's putting proposals >>> together? (Or are we considering '13 an unlucky, con-free year?) -Jodi
>> Hang on!
>> We *I* submitted ours two times. I stopped sending/submitting because >> I noticed there was an embargo placed on new users to the group. I >> then wrongly assumed all submissions were placed on an embargo to >> avoid people `photocopying` each other's submission.
>> Can the admin's check on this? Otherwise please come to Chicago in >> 2013. Lucky or no.
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:09, Francis Kayiwa <francis.kay...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Jodi Schneider <jschnei...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> Deadline extension & a reminder on the call, then? Who's putting proposals >>> together? (Or are we considering '13 an unlucky, con-free year?) -Jodi
>> Hang on!
>> We *I* submitted ours two times. I stopped sending/submitting because >> I noticed there was an embargo placed on new users to the group. I >> then wrongly assumed all submissions were placed on an embargo to >> avoid people `photocopying` each other's submission.
>> Can the admin's check on this? Otherwise please come to Chicago in >> 2013. Lucky or no.
>> -- >> Past hissy-fits are not a predictor of future hissy-fits --Nick Holland
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. >> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Ross Singer <rossfsin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 29, 2012, at 7:37 PM, "Michael J. Giarlo" <leftw...@alumni.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> I guess we have one proposal for 2013? That makes the voting a bit >> more straightforward?
> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Michael J. Giarlo < > leftw...@alumni.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> Just to confirm, y'all: Chicago should start preparations for the 2013 >> conference?
>> I say +1.
>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
I would feel more comfortable affirming that if this discussion was taking place on the main Code4Lib list. Otherwise, I'm fine with C4L2013 in Chicago.
Peter
On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote:
>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
-- Peter Murray Assistant Director, Technology Services Development LYRASIS Peter.Mur...@lyrasis.org +1 678-235-2955
1438 West Peachtree Street NW Suite 200 Atlanta, GA 30309 Toll Free: 800.999.8558 Fax: 404.892.7879 www.lyrasis.org
LYRASIS: Great Libraries. Strong Communities. Innovative Answers.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:57, Peter Murray <peter.mur...@lyrasis.org> wrote: > I would feel more comfortable affirming that if this discussion was taking place on the main Code4Lib list. Otherwise, I'm fine with C4L2013 in Chicago.
> Peter
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote: >> Just to confirm, y'all: Chicago should start preparations for the 2013 >> conference?
>> I say +1.
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:58, Becky Yoose <b.yo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> *Calculates distance between Grinnell and Chicago*
>>> *Output: drivable distance*
>>> *Calculates how many batches of vegan chocolate chip walnut cookies she can >>> fit in her luggage*
>>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> -- > Peter Murray > Assistant Director, Technology Services Development > LYRASIS > Peter.Mur...@lyrasis.org > +1 678-235-2955
> 1438 West Peachtree Street NW > Suite 200 > Atlanta, GA 30309 > Toll Free: 800.999.8558 > Fax: 404.892.7879 > www.lyrasis.org
> LYRASIS: Great Libraries. Strong Communities. Innovative Answers.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
If they are the only host by the deadline, then there seems to be no options BUT having them host it!
I actually kind of like that they were the only host -- because I think it means they can pretty much do WHATEVER they want with the conference next year, cause it's like, if they didn't, there'd be no conference, so do what you want with it! It's not like they fooled anyone into voting for you and then changed the conf on em!
They were the only ones who offered to do the conf, so it was them or no conf, so I think that gives em some freedom to make some changes to previous years -- cause it was those changes, or no conf. Want to make it bigger, want to make it smaller, want to make it entirely different? I might not personally like some things they could hypothetically do, but, hey, I don't have to go, and it's not like if they hadn't done em there would have been the 'usual' conf, there would have been nothing!
> I would feel more comfortable affirming that if this discussion was taking place on the main Code4Lib list. Otherwise, I'm fine with C4L2013 in Chicago.
> Peter
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote: >> Just to confirm, y'all: Chicago should start preparations for the 2013 >> conference?
>> I say +1.
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:58, Becky Yoose<b.yo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> *Calculates distance between Grinnell and Chicago*
>>> *Output: drivable distance*
>>> *Calculates how many batches of vegan chocolate chip walnut cookies she can >>> fit in her luggage*
>>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> If they are the only host by the deadline, then there seems to be no > options BUT having them host it!
> I actually kind of like that they were the only host -- because I think > it means they can pretty much do WHATEVER they want with the conference > next year, cause it's like, if they didn't, there'd be no conference, so > do what you want with it! It's not like they fooled anyone into voting > for you and then changed the conf on em!
> They were the only ones who offered to do the conf, so it was them or no > conf, so I think that gives em some freedom to make some changes to > previous years -- cause it was those changes, or no conf. Want to make > it bigger, want to make it smaller, want to make it entirely different? > I might not personally like some things they could hypothetically do, > but, hey, I don't have to go, and it's not like if they hadn't done em > there would have been the 'usual' conf, there would have been nothing!
> So go for it, Chicago folks.
> Jonathan
> On 1/31/2012 11:57 AM, Peter Murray wrote: >> I would feel more comfortable affirming that if this discussion was taking place on the main Code4Lib list. Otherwise, I'm fine with C4L2013 in Chicago.
>> Peter
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote: >>> Just to confirm, y'all: Chicago should start preparations for the 2013 >>> conference?
>>> I say +1.
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:58, Becky Yoose<b.yo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> *Calculates distance between Grinnell and Chicago*
>>>> *Output: drivable distance*
>>>> *Calculates how many batches of vegan chocolate chip walnut cookies she can >>>> fit in her luggage*
>>>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
