It looks like the conference proposals vote ended successfully. My count of proposal slots on the draft schedule is 22. Looking at the results of the vote...
"Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain" "The Golden Road (To Unlimited Devotion): Building a Socially Constructed Archive of Grateful Dead Artifacts"
I think in years past we've let both of the tied proposals in, and adjusted the schedule, but I'm wondering what the plans are for this year. Any thoughts?
> It looks like the conference proposals vote ended successfully. My > count of proposal slots on the draft schedule is 22. Looking at the > results of the vote...
> "Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain" > "The Golden Road (To Unlimited Devotion): Building a Socially > Constructed Archive of Grateful Dead Artifacts"
> I think in years past we've let both of the tied proposals in, and > adjusted the schedule, but I'm wondering what the plans are for this > year. Any thoughts?
> Thanks! > Kevin
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> We have had a run-off in the past, but however people want to work it.
> -Ross.
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <kscla...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all,
>> It looks like the conference proposals vote ended successfully. My >> count of proposal slots on the draft schedule is 22. Looking at the >> results of the vote...
>> "Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain" >> "The Golden Road (To Unlimited Devotion): Building a Socially >> Constructed Archive of Grateful Dead Artifacts"
>> I think in years past we've let both of the tied proposals in, and >> adjusted the schedule, but I'm wondering what the plans are for this >> year. Any thoughts?
>> Thanks! >> Kevin
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. >> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> I vote rubik's cube face-off, best two out of three.
> -- jaf
> Sent from my mobile phone
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:48 PM, "Ross Singer" <rossfsin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We have had a run-off in the past, but however people want to work it.
>> -Ross.
>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <kscla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all,
>>> It looks like the conference proposals vote ended successfully. My >>> count of proposal slots on the draft schedule is 22. Looking at the >>> results of the vote...
>>> "Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain" >>> "The Golden Road (To Unlimited Devotion): Building a Socially >>> Constructed Archive of Grateful Dead Artifacts"
>>> I think in years past we've let both of the tied proposals in, and >>> adjusted the schedule, but I'm wondering what the plans are for this >>> year. Any thoughts?
>>> Thanks! >>> Kevin
>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. >> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
Well, I like some of the things that didn't make the cut at all, so I vote for changing the schedule to have even more workshop slots to let them in too!
Just kidding, no I don't. And there's no vote, or rather we just had the vote, already!
I think it's really up to the conf committee (is there a program committee?), whatever works out best. You could have a run-off vote; you could, if you can figure out how, change the schedule to accomodate both; you could also change the schedule to _cut_ both. I think all of those are reasonable and defensible.
> I really like them both so I vote for adjusting the schedule!
> Edward
> -- > Edward M. Corrado
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 23:41, "Frumkin, Jeremy"<frumk...@u.library.arizona.edu> wrote:
>> I vote rubik's cube face-off, best two out of three.
>> -- jaf
>> Sent from my mobile phone
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:48 PM, "Ross Singer"<rossfsin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We have had a run-off in the past, but however people want to work it.
>>> -Ross.
>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Kevin S. Clarke<kscla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all,
>>>> It looks like the conference proposals vote ended successfully. My >>>> count of proposal slots on the draft schedule is 22. Looking at the >>>> results of the vote...
>>>> "Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain" >>>> "The Golden Road (To Unlimited Devotion): Building a Socially >>>> Constructed Archive of Grateful Dead Artifacts"
>>>> I think in years past we've let both of the tied proposals in, and >>>> adjusted the schedule, but I'm wondering what the plans are for this >>>> year. Any thoughts?
>>>> Thanks! >>>> Kevin
>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. >> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> wrote: > Well, I like some of the things that didn't make the cut at all, so I vote > for changing the schedule to have even more workshop slots to let them in > too!
> Just kidding, no I don't. And there's no vote, or rather we just had the > vote, already!
> I think it's really up to the conf committee (is there a program > committee?), whatever works out best. You could have a run-off vote; you > could, if you can figure out how, change the schedule to accomodate both; > you could also change the schedule to _cut_ both. I think all of those are > reasonable and defensible.
> On 12/12/2011 12:47 AM, Edward M Corrado wrote:
>> I really like them both so I vote for adjusting the schedule!
>> Edward
>> -- >> Edward M. Corrado
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 23:41, "Frumkin, >> Jeremy"<frumk...@u.library.arizona.edu> wrote:
>>> I vote rubik's cube face-off, best two out of three.
>>> -- jaf
>>> Sent from my mobile phone
>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:48 PM, "Ross Singer"<rossfsin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> We have had a run-off in the past, but however people want to work it.
>>>> -Ross.
>>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Kevin S. Clarke<kscla...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> It looks like the conference proposals vote ended successfully. My >>>>> count of proposal slots on the draft schedule is 22. Looking at the >>>>> results of the vote...
>>>>> "Relevance Ranking in the Scholarly Domain" >>>>> "The Golden Road (To Unlimited Devotion): Building a Socially >>>>> Constructed Archive of Grateful Dead Artifacts"
>>>>> I think in years past we've let both of the tied proposals in, and >>>>> adjusted the schedule, but I'm wondering what the plans are for this >>>>> year. Any thoughts?
>>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Kevin
>>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "code4libcon" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "code4libcon" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "code4libcon" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
> We are going with 23. Just finished editing the notification letters. > Got to do the name/email/letter match.
> --Anj
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Kevin S. Clarke <kscla...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Program committee... any word on your decision on this?
>> Thanks, >> Kevin
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "code4libcon" group. > To post to this group, send email to code4libcon@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to code4libcon+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/code4libcon?hl=en.
