Mortality due to lethal yellowing (LY) was recorded over 15 years for five coconut ecotypes representative of the diversity of coconut germplasm cultivated in Mexico. The trial was established in 1991 in an area of active LY outbreaks on the northern coast of Yucatan, Mexico, using a three block design with random distribution of the ecotypes within each block. The ecotypes included the susceptible Mexican Atlantic Tall (MXAT) and the resistant Malayan Yellow Dwarf (MYD), both used as references, and three Pacific Tall (PT) ecotypes, MXPT1, MXPT2 and MXPT3, to be tested. Parametric and non-parametric variance analyses of the results indicated significant differences (p<0.05) in mortality percentages among ecotypes and between blocks and no ecotype–environment interaction. Mortality was very high in MXAT and very low in MYD, similar to previous results in Jamaica. PT ecotypes had intermediate mortality percentages; mortality was low in MXPT1 and MXPT2 and not statistically different from that in MYD, while mortality was higher in MXPT3 and not statistically different from that in MXAT. According to these results we should expect that LY will cause lower mortality in coconut populations on the Pacific coasts, where most of the germplasm is MXPT, than the mortality rate observed in the Gulf of Mexico, where most of the germplasm is MXAT. MXPT1 and especially MXPT2 could be recommended (a) for replanting programmes; (b) as male parents for the production of dwarf × tall hybrids with the resistant MYD; and (c) for the selection of elite individuals with improved productivity for propagation purposes.
By
D.
Zizumbo-Villarreal
P.
Colunga-GarcíaMarín
M.
Fernández-Barrera
N.
Torres-Hernández
C.
Oropeza
PGRNewsletter Article published on No.156, 2008 in English
Page 23 to 33
This study was made with a very reduced sample size and therefore quite worthless…Luis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Coconut" group.
Having difficulty accessing the group website ? Get help by writing, in
confidence, to coconu...@googlegroups.com
Getting too many emails? The abridged email option (no more than 1 email per
day) gives a summary of new activity each day; the digest email option
(approximately 1 email per day) gives up to 25 full new messages bundled into a
single email. For more options, go to http://groups.google.com/group/coconut/subscribe
To unsubscribe, send an email to coconut-u...@googlegroups.com
To Luis
You joined about six months ago and if you first message says that
something is "quite worthless" it should also have given some
indication of your own qualifications for being so outspoken and,
perhaps, some advice on how to do it better.
To one and all
I posted the summary of the report because I was surprised to find it
published in what appears to the most recent issue of the Plant
Genetic Resources Newsletter - number 156 dated December 2008!
The "reduced sample size" that Luis mentioned has been a constraint
that many coconut research workers face and the Mexican group have
done more than many others - both to do the research AND to get the
results published.
Only when coconut research workers get the encouragement they need
will they benefit from thoughtful POSITIVE criticism from their
colleagues and from the community they serve - eleven million
households worldwide!
Hugh
On Apr 13, 12:37 am, Gerry Balacuit <gbalac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok luis which on worth it? got any essay for us to read.
> guess you got nothing. keep quite then
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Luis de Yturbe <ytu...@earthlink.net>wrote:
>
>
>
> > This study was made with a very reduced sample size and therefore quite
> > worthless…Luis
>
> > *From:* coc...@googlegroups.com [mailto:coc...@googlegroups.com] *On
> > Behalf Of *Hugh Harries
> > *Sent:* Monday, April 12, 2010 1:15 AM
> > *To:* Google coconut group; CICLY
> > *Subject:* [Coconut:3216] Mortality of Mexican coconut germplasm due to
> > lethal yellowing
>
> > *. . .
Ask how many palms where in the sample and you will find it was a ridiculous small number. Also palms were in very different environments and managed very differently.
Regretfully I threw the study into the waste paper basket. But surely you can find it . Also I advise you to visit the comparison sites in Yucatan.
And then we see who will need to keep quite.
Luis
Sir,
The author of this letter has nearly 22 years experience in breeding for resistance to coconut Root (wilt) disease and we have developed and released two resistant varieties against root (wilt) disease.
Luis has given negative opinion probabaly because he may not be knowing how dificult it is to conduct long term breeding programmes in coconut . The authors have brought out out very useful informations on resistance to lethal yellowing disease. Significant diferences in the range of disease incidence among varieties show the genetic diferences among varieties for resistance.
The authors has done a lot of painstaking studies and came out with very valuable informations. Kindly accept my congratulations.
RV Nair
Head, Division of Crop Improvement,
Centarl Plantation Crops Research InstituteKasaragode, Kerala , India. --- On Tue, 13/4/10, Luis de Yturbe <ytu...@earthlink.net> wrote: |
--
RV Nair,
I am not criticizing other work. Only the one reported on lethal yellowing disease in Yucatan where I found the universe of coconuts too small and the management too different to make any useful conclusions.
Thank you for your e-mail
Luis
I do not understand the relevance of a true fact to the time I have been a
member.
Please let me know how to unsubscribe to group.
I am not interested in arguing but learning and my believe is that no
information is better that bad information and this is why I made my
comment.
I am sorry you were offended
Luis
-----Original Message-----
From: coc...@googlegroups.com [mailto:coc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Hugh
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Coconut" group.
Having difficulty accessing the group website ? Get help by writing, in
confidence, to coconu...@googlegroups.com
Getting too many emails? The abridged email option (no more than 1 email per
day) gives a summary of new activity each day; the digest email option
(approximately 1 email per day) gives up to 25 full new messages bundled
into a single email. For more options, go to
http://groups.google.com/group/coconut/subscribe
To unsubscribe, send an email to coconut-u...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Coconut" group.
Having difficulty accessing the group website ? Get help by writing, in confidence, to coconu...@googlegroups.com
Getting too many emails? The abridged email option (no more than 1 email per day) gives a summary of new activity each day; the digest email option (approximately 1 email per day) gives up to 25 full new messages bundled into a single email. For more options, go to http://groups.google.com/group/coconut/subscribe
To unsubscribe, send an email to coconut-u...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
Dear members,
Hugh harries has great expertise on coconut and he puts in a lot of hard work to sustain this group. This group owes a lot to him,much more than anybody else.We members do not like anyone to write hurting, even in a small way,a person like Hugh Harries
|
Hugh,
Although Yucatan State has as you stated correctly 38,402 sq km not even .001% of the territory has palms. As a fact palms exist mostly as decorative for resorts and private homes in the beach. I myself have 160 palms between a small farm and in a property I own in Chicxulub. A tiny universe but a large a real one for Yucatan standards. All palms are equally and properly managed.
The largest grower is Roberto Hernadez, a Mexican millionaire who bought over 600 maypam palms sold to him by Rafael Aristi for decorative purposes for his 4 resort/haciendas and property south of Tulum. These palms were imported them from Costa Rica and bred by Rafael.. The survival rate would be an interesting fact to know and easy to find out by any of the scientists in Yucatan. This data alone would be more accurate than the one provided by official study. . I talked to one of his managers and he told me he had lost over 50 % of them to yellow in the first 5 years, but this fact needs to be confirmed.
I am not a scientist but if you are interested in my results with coconut palms over the last 10 years here they are. I am presently in Europe so I don’t have the exact numbers but the ones I am giving you by memory are very close.
I have 160 palms (70 pacific tall, 30 malayan dwarf and 60 hibrid maypan brought originally from Costa Rica. In the first 7 years 20% of the pacific died, 40 % of the hybrids as well as the Malayan dwarf. I have replaced all my dead palms with pacific tall not only because I got a much better survival rate but because they are more beautiful, hardy and get less mites which is a problem here. I have only three palm diesin the last two year. I have fumigated against mites in the last two years and this may be a factor.
I hope this non-professional, limited information is helpful.
This will be my last e-mail. I have asked to be unsubscribed.
Thank you,
Luis
In the last 5 years I have lost to disease
From: coc...@googlegroups.com [mailto:coc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Hugh Harries
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 4:15 PM
To: coc...@googlegroups.com
Getting too many emails? The abridged email option (no more than 1 email per day) gives a summary of new activity each day; the digest email option (approximately 1 email per day) gives up to 25 full new messages bundled into a single email. For more options, go to http://groups.google.com/group/coconut/subscribe
Please tell me how to unsubscribe . This is the message I get
Luis
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<coconut-u...@googlegroups.com>:
host gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com [209.85.217.62]:
550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist. Please try
550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at
550 5.1.1 http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=6596 12si566657gxk.2
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <ytu...@earthlink.net>
Received: from [194.209.10.50] (helo=LuisYturbePC)
by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67)
(envelope-from <ytu...@earthlink.net>)
id 1O1uaC-00076B-D4
for coconut-u...@googlegroups.com; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:52:13 -0400
From: "Luis de Yturbe" <ytu...@earthlink.net>
To: <coconut-u...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Please unsubcribe ytu...@earthlink.net
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:52:11 -0500
Message-ID: <013701cadb8e$3f90be90$beb23bb0$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0138_01CADB64.56BAB690"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acrbjj1oNdwq4bWKQG+e6ucQNV1DQw==
Content-Language: en-us
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: GP8= PP0= ASp8 AqNb BNMs B0ex CZA/ D1hh GQ2b GozD Gyu5 G1Kx Hm0E H+LK IShZ Ibmb;1;YwBvAGMAbwBuAHUAdAAtAHUAbgBzAHUAYgBzAGMAcgBpAGIAZQBAAGcAbwBvAGcAbABlAGcAcgBvAHUAcABzAC4AYwBvAG0A;Sosha1_v1;7;{4A5E7DB4-63F3-48C8-86CE-1ECC2E92285D};eQB0AHUAcgBiAGUAQABlAGEAcgB0AGgAbABpAG4AawAuAG4AZQB0AA==;Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:52:09 GMT;UABsAGUAYQBzAGUAIAB1AG4AcwB1AGIAYwByAGkAYgBlACAAeQB0AHUAcgBiAGUAQABlAGEAcgB0AGgAbABpAG4AawAuAG4AZQB0AA==
x-cr-puzzleid: {4A5E7DB4-63F3-48C8-86CE-1ECC2E92285D}
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0138_01CADB64.56BAB690
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Please unsubcribe ytu...@earthlink.net
------=_NextPart_000_0138_01CADB64.56BAB690
Dear Hugh:
Thanks very much for letting the CICLY community know about our recent publication release.
Dear CICLY community:
Acknowledging the recent exchange of messages in relation to the paper mentioned above, we would like to present the following points.
· The plants included in the trial are not in different sites. They are all in a single site, in which the disease was active during length of the trial.
· All the plants included in the trial were of the same age and planted at the same time.
· The plants included in the trial were not managed differently. And managed was carried out to allow the presence of grass species to promote occurrence of potential insect vectors.
· Any effect of environmental differences within the site of the trial was tried to be overcome with the design of the experiment.
· The presence of the LY pathogen in diseased plants was determined using microscopy techniques at the beginning and molecular techniques the rest of the time.
· The trial included the very susceptible Atlantic Tall palms, both as a way to promote disease pressure, when they got infected, and as a reference ecotype to determine disease incidence.
· The trial included the highly resistant Malayan Yellow Dwarf palms as a reference ecotype for resistance.
· The trial evaluated three Mexican Pacific Ecotypes that were the main subject of study.
· The sample size for each ecotype evaluated was:
Malayan Yellow Dwarf: 18 palms
Atlantic Tall: 91 palms
Mexican Pacific Tall Ecotype 1: 152 palms
Mexican Pacific Tall Ecotype 2: 90 palms
Mexican Pacific Tall Ecotype 3: 62 palms
· The differences reported between the responses of the ecotypes evaluated, were analyzed statistically by parametric and non-parametric methods and the results with both showed to be significant (p < 0.05).
All these pieces of information are described in detail within the text of the paper, but we are highlighting them here to facilitate the discussion currently going on at CICLY.
At the same time we invite those that have not read the whole paper to do so, by visiting the Journal web page with the the link kindly provided by Hugh.
With kind regards for everybody
Daniel Zizumbo and Carlos Oropeza
Centro de Investigacion Cientifica de Yucatan (CICY)
Merida, Yucatan, Mexico
Hugh et.al.,
I can recall that (perhaps) towards the end of 1997, as part of a Training Course we visited a coastal site just outside Merida. Part of this visit was a tour of a long-term ecological experiment to evaluate the response of different coconut genotypes to lethal yellowing. Is this site part of this continuing study? Is this the final report on this study? If not there should be scope to gather even more data, albeit not only in space but over time.
I recall at the time that plans had taken shape to extend this kind of long-term eco-study over macro-environments in different coastal zones in Atlantic Mexico and across countries. Are some of these environments referenced in this discussion?
These studies should be expanded, encouraged, but the question of sample size will be explained by the authors and publishers. I hope to gain some insight from these discussions, since we here at NARI have already started establishment of two ( 6-acre, and expanding) depositories long term ecological studies as well.
Regards.
Cleveland Paul
NARI, GUYANA -------Original Message-------
|
Getting too many emails? The abridged email option (no more than 1 email per day) gives a summary of new activity each day; the digest email option (approximately 1 email per day) gives up to 25 full new messages bundled into a single email. For more options, go to http://groups.google.com/group/coconut/subscribe |