On May 18, 2012, at 3:55 PM, David Jacobs wrote:
> Where were we on the moderation/new member vetting process?
I turned off moderation but Steve is not a first-time poster so he wouldn't have gone to moderation in any case.
Steve, I agree (with you among others) that it was an error to include the image inline. It's been suggested that you should have posted a link and told us what we were about to look at. In addition I would suggest putting the "NSFW" at the *beginning* of the subject line where it wouldn't be cropped as it was for me.
I'm going to assume this was a one-time honest mistake (I know they happen) unless you start posting images every day with comments like "Hey, do you think this looks too much like a wee-wee?"
In answer to your question, I'm not an expert on Apple's review process but it seems obvious to me the image would have a slim-to-none chance of passing. I'd say the very *premise* of the app skates on thin ice, but I'm reminded of an app that a friend dashed off a while back that offers a different kind of therapeutic touch:
<
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ibooboo/id335445494?mt=8>
> Do you have a boo-boo? Do you need someone to kiss it and make you feel better? Let iBooBoo provide you with instant relief!
(Safe for work.)
--Andy