Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Denver cop arrested in teen beating

0 views
Skip to first unread message

monkey_...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 10, 2008, 12:29:19 AM5/10/08
to
I believe a strong police force is one that has ethics and
professionalism. Not reckless people like these who endanger
themselves their fellow officers and the public.

Denver cop arrested in teen beating
Teen alleges excessive force by gang bureau officer
By Christopher N. Osher
The Denver Post
Article Last Updated: 05/09/2008 06:07:16 AM MDT


A 12-year veteran of the Denver Police Department was arrested
Thursday on a felony charge of second-degree assault after accusations
that he used excessive force against a 16-year-old.

Officer Charles Porter, 40, has been suspended without pay from the
department. He had been assigned to the gang bureau prior to the
charges.

The suspension is in connection with alleged excessive force against
Juan "Willie" Vasquez, who suffered a lacerated liver, kidney injuries
and broken ribs on April 18 near West 37th Avenue and Pecos Street.

An incident report was unavailable late Thursday.

Vasquez has undergone at least two surgeries at Denver Health Medical
Center and still has a tube inserted into his back to expel bodily
fluids, said his brother Felipe Vasquez, 27.

"He said they jumped on him with both feet," the brother said. "He
said they beat him and hit him with a flashlight, and they left him
there and gave each other high-fives, and then the ambulance came.
Then they said, 'What happened, did you fall?' "

The arrest of a Denver officer in connection with use of force is not
unprecedented, but it is rare. The vast majority of citizen complaints
alleging unnecessary force by police result in no internal discipline,
let alone criminal charges.

Porter, who has declined comment, has had a past discipline issue.

Safety Manager Al LaCabe last year suspended Porter for 30 days
without pay for failing to notify police dispatchers that his partner
had shot a suspect on March 29, 2007. A police supervisor eventually
made the proper notifications in that case.

Independent monitor Richard Rosenthal, who oversees police internal
investigations, had pushed for a harsher penalty for the failure to
notify dispatch of the shooting.

In a report on the incident, Rosenthal, without naming Porter, said he
thought a harsher penalty of a 60-day suspension was warranted, in
part, because Porter originally made a misleading statement to the
dispatcher that he and his partner were investigating a one-car crash
even after the shots had been fired.

"The officer was deceptive in his communication with dispatch,
incomplete in his communication with his supervisor and, as such, put
numerous lives in danger," Rosenthal wrote in the report. "In
addition, his actions had a negative impact on the integrity of a
well- thought out and long-standing officer-involved shooting
investigation protocol."

For the recent assault allegations, Porter was booked by the Denver
Sheriff Department and posted bond Thursday.

Lt. Ronald Saunier said that an investigation into the excessive-force
case is ongoing and that a decision on formal charges is not expected
from the Denver district attorney's office until later this week.

The Denver chapter of the Latino Peace Officers Association, which is
composed of more than 80 Denver police officers, has asked Police
Chief Gerry Whitman to turn the case over to the FBI for investigation
of possible civil-rights violations.

Christopher N. Osher: 303-954-1747 or cos...@denverpost.com

Trace

unread,
May 10, 2008, 4:04:54 AM5/10/08
to

He's gotta be a democrat.

Topaz

unread,
May 10, 2008, 5:47:47 AM5/10/08
to
On Fri, 9 May 2008 21:29:19 -0700 (PDT), monkey_...@yahoo.com
wrote:

>
>The suspension is in connection with alleged excessive force against
>Juan "Willie" Vasquez, who suffered a lacerated liver, kidney injuries
>and broken ribs on April 18 near West 37th Avenue and Pecos Street.
>

He probably had it coming. Blacks, Mexicans, and liberals are
against the police because they are on the side of the criminals.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Trace

unread,
May 10, 2008, 10:02:53 AM5/10/08
to
On May 10, 4:47 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 21:29:19 -0700 (PDT), monkey_cartm...@yahoo.com

Most seem to dislike the police. I really like cops that are good
guys. There are a lot of them who are cool headed, don't jump to
conclusions, don't use excessive force, don't talk down to the people
who pay them, etc. I recently met a really great cop at a Starbucks.
This guy was the kind of person you want in your neighborhood.

monkey_...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 10, 2008, 11:40:33 PM5/10/08
to

Topaz wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 21:29:19 -0700 (PDT), monkey_...@yahoo.com
> wrote:
>
> >
> >The suspension is in connection with alleged excessive force against
> >Juan "Willie" Vasquez, who suffered a lacerated liver, kidney injuries
> >and broken ribs on April 18 near West 37th Avenue and Pecos Street.
> >
> He probably had it coming. Blacks, Mexicans, and liberals are
> against the police because they are on the side of the criminals.
>

How do you get that? Seems to me if you support cops who commit crimes
you worthless fucks are the criminal supporters. Never ceases to amaze
me how people consider holding government accountable is somehow
criminal
or criminal supporting, while you people never hold our government
officials accountable. Would you beat children if you were a cop also?
We had a cop who put a young teen in a jail cell with a brutal serial
street rapist child rapist,
heck the so-called man even molested kids at a church for fucks sake
and there the people like you were, saying the girl deserved it. You
people are anti-American shit.

Heck some cops even helped a convicted 'tiny' child molester I know
who sys the same anti-race anti-Liberal crap where he crossed state
lines and the cops helped 'it' avoid registering as a sex offender.
What is it with you people? One guy, who is pro violent cops talked
about raping liberal kids and that he could molest children
because he support 'these' type of cops.

When you condone this you give cops the message that they do anything,
like try to steal your money, or rape your wife or child, you do
understand how this whole deal works know that don't you??

Have some fucking pride and respect with your law-enforcement.

monkey_...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 10, 2008, 11:56:01 PM5/10/08
to

Topaz wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 21:29:19 -0700 (PDT), monkey_...@yahoo.com
> wrote:
>
> >
> >The suspension is in connection with alleged excessive force against
> >Juan "Willie" Vasquez, who suffered a lacerated liver, kidney injuries
> >and broken ribs on April 18 near West 37th Avenue and Pecos Street.
> >
> He probably had it coming. Blacks, Mexicans, and liberals are
> against the police because they are on the side of the criminals.
>
>

Yet you are the type of people that say liberals want a repressive
government. People like you have scrambled sick
ethics and warped political thinking.

I could give a fuck less if you are a racist, but you should demand
that police act in an ethical manner, like
all government should act. Demand that the cops leave the racism and
anti-liberal values and drug use and
crime at the door.

Trace

unread,
May 11, 2008, 4:12:02 AM5/11/08
to
On May 10, 10:56 pm, monkey_cart...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Topaz wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 May 2008 21:29:19 -0700 (PDT), monkey_cartm...@yahoo.com

WE HAVE A LONG HISTORY OF ALLOWING COPS TO BREAK THE LAW TO ENFORCE IT
WHICH BRINGS THE COPS TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THEY CAN DO NO WRONG. WE
MUST STOP THIS TREND AND HOLD COPS AND CPS AND ALL OTHER LEVELS OF LAW
ENFORCEMENT TO AN EVEN HIGHER STANDARD THAT THAT OF THE TYPICAL
AMERICAN. IF THEY FAIL US, REMOVE THEM FROM OFFICE AT THE NEXT
ELECTION.

Topaz

unread,
May 11, 2008, 1:28:52 PM5/11/08
to
On Sat, 10 May 2008 07:02:53 -0700 (PDT), Trace
<trace...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>Most seem to dislike the police. I really like cops that are good
>guys. There are a lot of them who are cool headed, don't jump to
>conclusions, don't use excessive force, don't talk down to the people
>who pay them, etc. I recently met a really great cop at a Starbucks.
>This guy was the kind of person you want in your neighborhood.

Here are some guys you might dislike more than cops:

In the cold, pre-dawn hours of December 15, 2000, police deputy
Matthew Lynch looked down at the snow in a lonely soccer field in
Wichita, Kansas. The snow was pink, and spotted with red. It was
stained with blood: the blood of the White victims of one of the most
vicious racial attacks in American history -- the attack that has
become known as the
Wichita Massacre.

The bodies of four dead White Americans lay in that soccer field, and
there would have been five if not for a near-miracle that allowed one
of the White victims, a 25-year-old schoolteacher we'll call HG, to
survive to tell her story. She ran naked for a mile in 17-degree
weather before she found help, and she refused medical attention (even
though she was suffering from a gunshot wound) until she was sure that
her helpers had heard and understood her story. She said "...Don't
call 911 yet! I want you to hear this story in case I die." You see,
young HG wasn't sure she would live long enough to tell her story
otherwise -- after having been kidnapped, robbed, repeatedly raped,
forced to engage in sex acts, shot execution-style in the back of the
head, and then run over by a truck
and left for dead by her two Black male attackers. That 25-year-old
woman wanted us to know what happened. And thanks to the workings of a
fate which looks a lot like Providence, and to her own endurance and
courage, we do know what happened there. And we must never forget the
Wichita Massacre...

According to HG's testimony (which was subsequently censored)
transcribed at the court TV message board, the Whites were forced to
submit to rape and sodomy from the Blacks and were also forced to rape
each other to put on a kind of "sex show" for the Blacks : "they had
Heather and I come out of the bedroom...and they told us to perform
oral
sex. I did to Heather first and she did that back and then ...he
shouted ...my mouth to her vagina..uh...it would be her mouth to my
vagina... they wanted [us] to... digitally penetrate one another and
we did that." The Blacks then forced Mr. Befort and Mr. Heyka to have
intercourse with HG, and when they were unable or unwilling to perform
as demanded they were mercilessly beat on the head with golf clubs
until they were almost senseless. Neighbors stated that the men's
blood, as a result of these beatings, "was everywhere in the duplex."
HG's testimony continued: "We had sex but he didn't have an
erection... so they were angry...several guys came out...they hit him
on the back of the head and after that I went back into the closet.
...we were under the impression that after they were done they would
probably shoot us. And then they were just screaming, one of them made
er ....a howling sound... they moved so that they could get a better
view... they were angry that he wasn't doing what they had asked him
to do...he didn't do what they
wanted...there was some conversation about an erection....you have
some certain time to get that vagina entered! ...He cried out. if he
didn't have an erection, he would be SHOT...so I was trying to help
Jason..." Later, the Blacks repeatedly raped and sodomized the two
White women, in the words of HG: " at that point in time Brad was gone
...while Brad was gone ...I was pulled out to the wetbar...where he
raped me. ...he had on an orange and black sweater that has FUBU. ...I
was spread on the floor on all fours...with him behind me ...I saw a
silver handgun ...by me as I was down on all fours."...

Three hours after the ordeal began, at 2:07 AM, the Blacks loaded the
men into the trunk and took the five young Whites for their final
ride, the men nude, the women naked from the waist down.

Arriving shortly thereafter at the lonely, snow-covered soccer field,
the Blacks ordered the five Whites to kneel in the snow and then shot
them one by one in the back of the head. HG remembers "As I was
kneeling, a gun shot went off? I heard Aaron . . . I could distinguish
Aaron's voice. He said, 'Please, no sir, please.' The gun went off."

There were three shots and then: "I felt the bullet hit the back of my
head. It went kind of gray with white like stars. I wasn't knocked
unconscious. I didn't fall forward. Then someone kicked me, and I had
fallen forward. I was playing dead. I didn't move. I didn't want them
to shoot me again." The Blacks, thinking the Whites were dead, got
into
Jason Befort's pickup truck and ran over the bodies, including the
living body of HG.

She says: "I waited until I couldn't hear any more, then I turned my
head and saw lights going. I looked at everyone. Everyone was face
down. Jason was next to me. I rolled him over. There was blood
squirting everywhere, so I took my sweater off and tied it around his
head to try and stop it. He had blood coming out of his eyes." The
rest you know.
Everyone except HG was killed, and she is now testifying in the trial
of Jonathan and Reginald Carr.

According to New Nation News, a pro-White alternative Web site, the
autopsy of 25-year-old Heather Muller, the student who was also a
preschool teaching volunteer, indicated new trauma to her hymen,
showing that she had been a virgin at the time of her rape and murder,
belying the statement allegedly made by Reginald Carr "Ever been with
a Black dude before, you bitch?"

Naturally, the defense is trying to confuse the identities of the
brothers: the brother who had a bushy "afro" style now wears
"cornrows," and the brother who had "cornrows" has shaved his head,
and both are now wearing glasses and squinting a great deal.

And the arrogance of these Blacks, who know that the system in this
country will not tolerate Whites expressing even the mildest racial
preference or concern, is almost unbelievable. One Black juror, a
Boeing employee, was being questioned about his feelings toward the
Carrs when he said "I hate to see young Black men go through this."

In a CourtTV forum message, a local woman in Wichita stated:

"I attended the second day of the preliminary hearing, the day after
the surviving victim recounted the horrific ordeal of the Carr
brothers' victims. During a break in the proceedings, several family
members of the Carr brothers left their seats in the back of the
courtroom and sat in the jury box, where they were only a few feet
away from the defendants. All manner of laughing, giggling and making
faces at each other then ensued. It was the most surreal and repugnant
sight I've ever witnessed. When Reginald Carr saw me staring at this
display, he flicked his tongue, obscenely, at me; a gesture I've
experienced several times before when driving by black men on the
street."

And the massacre didn't even begin with the horrors of that night. A
few days earlier, the Carr brothers carjacked a White man, Andrew
Schreiber, and attacked and repeatedly shot Linda Walenta, a cellist
in the Wichita Symphony, as she tried to escape them. She was
paralyzed and suffered for three weeks before finally dying.

From the time of the attacks themselves, through the arrests of the
Carr brothers, the preliminary hearings, the depositions, and now the
trial itself, the Wichita Massacre has received very little national
attention from the Jewish-controlled media, just as we predicted it
would not.

Though these same media outlets shouted from the housetops for years
about the dragging death of a Black man in Texas committed by Whites,
and about the murder of homosexual Matthew Shepard, and even filled
the airwaves with "outrage" over the use of excessive force against
the Black criminal Rodney King, there has been hardly a mention of the
grisly rape-murders of the Wichita Massacre.

Almost all of the coverage has been local Wichita coverage, with even
readers in Kansas City complaining they get little news of the
massacre in their local media. Ingram's, a local magazine, states that
the major media there have given only inside-page notice to the
massacre - with no mentions of the interracial nature of the crimes in
the Kansas City
Star, and that their research revealed that Kansas City media had
given considerably more coverage to the killing of an animal called
"Scruffy the Dog" a few years back than they did to the Carr brothers
and their seven White victims.

Another message, this one from a retired police detective, which was
posted (and then removed) from CourtTV's Internet forum, stated the
media non-coverage issue succinctly:

"As a retired Chicago homicide detective, I have yet to hear of any
more VICIOUS and COLD-BLOODED (5) homicides involving a PERSONAL
CONFRONTATION between victims and STRANGERS than this case which
resulted in ONE HUNDRED HIRTEEN (113) FELONY COUNTS vs. Reginald CARR
and his brother, Jonathan.

"This case involves a home invasion, repeated rapes and sexual
assaults, armed robberies, burglary, abductions, theft and car-jacking
as well as the execution-style murders of naked victims in a
snow-covered soccer field.

"Aside from the Internet and local media, the mainstream national
media has suppressed news coverage of these most HEINOUS atrocities
outside of the State of Kansas. The case also involves a gag order in
which (considering ONE HUNDRED THIRTEEN FELONY COUNTS) the public has
yet to learn the full extent of this outrage!

"Please have full COURT TV national coverage of Kansas v. Carr. Bros?
Veteran homicide detectives can assure all that it does NOT get ANY
WORSE than the WICHITA MASSACRE!"

Please, please give this trial national coverage -- so pleaded
hundreds of White people outraged at the silence of the media. (It
should have been hundreds of thousands, but give the new White media
time to grow.) It looked too good to be true when Time-Warner's
CourtTV, in the person of chief anchor Fred Graham, announced in
September that they would air "gavel-to-gavel" coverage of the Wichita
Massacre trial. That statement sent a wave of hope through the White
community, but that hope was dashed to the ground when, a few weeks
later, CourtTV abruptly decided to drop all but minimal coverage of
the trial. At around the same time, many discussions on CourtTV's own
message board about the case suddenly disappeared, and those who tried
to re-post the deleted information or protest the censorship found
that their accounts had been terminated and
their messages erased.

There had been no public protest of the upcoming trial coverage.
Despite the arrogance of the anti-White forces in our society, they
still didn't dare to publicly call for censorship of such a horrific
crime. The pressures that forced the change in plans were
behind-the-scenes pressures, pressures that have been kept secret from
us. The ostensible reason given by front man Graham for nixing the
Wichita Massacre coverage was the upcoming trial of a rabbi accused of
murdering his wife. That in itself would be enough to make us suspect
intentional misdirection from Jewish sources, even if we hadn't
discovered the fact that CourtTV is, according to their own Web site,
a proud "partner" with the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B'nai
Brith, whose anti-White activities are well known. CourtTV states on
their own Web site that the ADL "is one of the nation's premier civil
rights/human relations agencies fighting anti-Semitism and all forms
of bigotry, defending democratic ideals, and protecting civil rights."

I also checked the ADL's own Web site, and they announce proudly that,
right around the time that the coverage of the Wichita Massacre would
have started, CourtTV will be airing an ADL-sponsored program called
"Empowering Children in the Aftermath of Hate." What an interesting
coincidence. When one sees these connections, and remembers that
heavily-Jewish Time Warner is a major owner of CourtTV, it is no
longer
surprising that CourtTV suddenly -- and at the last minute -- pulled
the rug out from under coverage of the Wichita Massacre Trial, leaving
other networks ill-prepared to step in even if they had wanted to.

The Jewish minority in the United States has a virtual monopoly
control over our mass media, and all decisions that they make are
decisions which place Jewish interests first. That is the key to
understanding why CourtTV didn't cover this trial; that is the key to
understanding why White people aren't allowed to have any institutions
or preferences for
themselves, that is they key to understanding why outrages like the
Wichita Massacre aren't considered hate crimes - even when they
involve Blacks targeting only Whites seven times in a row, even when
they involve gross sexual degradation and murder of Whites by Blacks,
and even when racial references are made by the attackers - while at
the same time Whites who post an innocent sticker saying that Whites
are an endangered species are charged with hate crimes. Understanding
the facts and the consequences of Jewish media control are the keys to
understanding what has happened to our country. I hope you'll continue
to listen to these programs and write to us for a copy of our book
catalog and magazine so you can understand the problem more fully and
help us solve it in the future. Without Jewish media control, the
situation in America would never have deteriorated to the point that
made the Wichita Massacre possible. Even in the America of today,
without Jewish media control changing the massacre from a hate crime
to a hush crime the outrage from an enlightened White population would
sweep the nation. Understanding media control is the key to
understanding our current paralysis.

Topaz

unread,
May 11, 2008, 1:39:57 PM5/11/08
to
On Sat, 10 May 2008 20:40:33 -0700 (PDT), monkey_...@yahoo.com
wrote:


>
>How do you get that? Seems to me if you support cops who commit crimes
>you worthless fucks are the criminal supporters.

If someone mouths off to me I would want to punch him in the mouth.
It should not be a crime. Most of the real criminals are Blacks and
Mexicans.

>Never ceases to amaze
>me how people consider holding government accountable is somehow
>criminal
>or criminal supporting, while you people never hold our government
>officials accountable. Would you beat children if you were a cop also?
>We had a cop who put a young teen in a jail cell with a brutal serial
>street rapist child rapist,

The brutal serial street rapist was in jail in the first place
because of the cops. And if he got a few kicks and punches along the
way I personally do not give a shit. Yes, cops can be bad. But the
real bad ones are the criminals and they are mostly non-Whites. And it
looks like they needed more jail cells.


>heck the so-called man even molested kids at a church for fucks sake
>and there the people like you were, saying the girl deserved it. You
>people are anti-American shit.

They should execute the so-called man with no delay. You don't seem
to understand what I wrote and may be a low IQ non-White.

>
>Heck some cops even helped a convicted 'tiny' child molester I know
>who sys the same anti-race anti-Liberal crap where he crossed state
>lines and the cops helped 'it' avoid registering as a sex offender.
>What is it with you people? One guy, who is pro violent cops talked
>about raping liberal kids and that he could molest children
>because he support 'these' type of cops.

It sounds like you have your head up your ass. I hate the criminals.

>
>When you condone this you give cops the message that they do anything,
>like try to steal your money, or rape your wife or child, you do
>understand how this whole deal works know that don't you??
>
>Have some fucking pride and respect with your law-enforcement.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

Topaz

unread,
May 11, 2008, 1:44:35 PM5/11/08
to
On Sat, 10 May 2008 20:56:01 -0700 (PDT), monkey_...@yahoo.com
wrote:


>
>Yet you are the type of people that say liberals want a repressive
>government.

I don't say kosher conservative crap like that.

> People like you have scrambled sick
>ethics and warped political thinking.

What political party do you think I support?

>
>I could give a fuck less if you are a racist, but you should demand
>that police act in an ethical manner, like
>all government should act.

I consider kicking and punching low-life criminals who have it coming
to be ethical.

>Demand that the cops leave the racism and
>anti-liberal values and drug use and
>crime at the door.


The Black War On White Americans
An Overview of U.S. Crime!

"What image do you have of racial violence in the U.S.? What type of
person do you think commits interracial or "hate" crime? If you get
your information from the mass media (TV, radio, major newspapers, and
popular magazines), you probably have an image of a vicious, ignorant,
gun-loving, hate-filled, skinhead, Klansman, or militiaman - all white
of course, that is a completely false stereotype. The truth is exactly
the opposite!
The media, protected class minorities, and anti-white politicians
expect you to twist in anguish over black-on-black crime or the rare
but well-publicized white-on-black crime, but they never mention the
much greater amount of black-on-white crime? Yes, blacks commit more
crime against whites (1.58 million crimes per year) than they do
against other blacks (1.34 million crimes per year)! It's a virtual
war of black criminals and white victims!
You'll never read the facts in the national media! Why? Paul Sheehan,
an Australian reporter, dug out the following information for an
article in the Sydney Morning Herald , May 2, 1995. Sheehan based his
statistics on crime data compiled by the FBI and partially reported
each year in The FBI Uniform Crime Report . These reports can be
researched at the FBI's website, www.fbi.gov. Since the FBI doesn't
distinguish between Hispanics and whites, Sheehan's statistics don't
adequately reflect the black-white crime situation. Only about 10-15%
of Hispanics are white, with the rest being Indian or a mixture of
white, American Indian, and blacks. Hispanic crime rates are almost as
high as black crime rates. This means that the data Sheehan compiled
on inter-racial crime is probably grossly
understated since a considerable portion of the "white against black"
crime actually is Hispanic against black crime. (Information about
this aspect of inter-racial crime will be presented in a related
article.) Here is the information Sheehan uncovered in his analysis of
the FBI's crime reports:
Blacks murder more than 1,600 whites each year.
Blacks murder whites at 18 times the rate whites murder blacks.
Blacks murdered, raped, robbed, or assaulted about one million whites
in
1992.
In the last 30 years, blacks committed 170 million violent and
non-violent crimes against whites.
Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for
murder than whites under 18.
About 90% of the victims of interracial crimes are white.
Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than whites,
although whites outnumber blacks by 7 to 1.
On a per capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crime than
whites.
Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than white
neighborhoods.
Of the 27 million nonviolent robberies in 1992, 31% (8.4 million) were
committed by blacks against whites. Less than 2% were committed by
whites against blacks.
Of the 6.6 million violent crimes, 20% (1.3 million) were interracial.
Of the the 1.3 million interracial violent crimes, 90% (1.17 million)
are black against white.
In the past 20 years, violent crime increased four times faster than
the population.
In the last 30 years (1964-94), more than 45,000 people were killed in
interracial murders compared to 38,000 killed in Korea and 58,000 in
Vietnam. Sheehan commented that the contents of his article could not
possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media. In
the last 50 years, the white part of the American population has
declined from 90% to 72%. The U.S. now has about 33 million blacks and
25 million Hispanics (legal and illegal). By the year 2050, American
whites will be a minority, just 49%. By 2100, whites will be 25% of
the population. What will life for whites be like in the future? The
United States of America A white country in 1776 A Third World country
in 2076!"

Topaz

unread,
May 11, 2008, 1:49:58 PM5/11/08
to
On Sun, 11 May 2008 01:12:02 -0700 (PDT), Trace
<trace...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>
>WE HAVE A LONG HISTORY OF ALLOWING COPS TO BREAK THE LAW TO ENFORCE IT
>WHICH BRINGS THE COPS TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THEY CAN DO NO WRONG. WE
>MUST STOP THIS TREND AND HOLD COPS AND CPS AND ALL OTHER LEVELS OF LAW
>ENFORCEMENT TO AN EVEN HIGHER STANDARD THAT THAT OF THE TYPICAL
>AMERICAN. IF THEY FAIL US, REMOVE THEM FROM OFFICE AT THE NEXT
>ELECTION.

Why are people griping about cops? They are mostly good, though they
may have shit for brains due to getting training lessons from the
Jewish ADL, but deep down they are mostly good. They are the ones who
put the low life criminal scum in their place. We should be griping
more about the low life criminal scum.

Trace

unread,
May 11, 2008, 1:58:32 PM5/11/08
to
On May 11, 12:49 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2008 01:12:02 -0700 (PDT), Trace
>

Are you attempting to flood this topic to stop the discussion?

Topaz

unread,
May 12, 2008, 5:18:08 PM5/12/08
to

No

_ Prof. Jonez _

unread,
May 17, 2008, 9:43:32 AM5/17/08
to
monkey_...@yahoo.com wrote:
> I believe a strong police force is one that has ethics and
> professionalism. Not reckless people like these who endanger
> themselves their fellow officers and the public.

Cops are Scum.

0 new messages