I said
> danny <us...@example.net> wrote:
>
>>Doesn't have to be but mostly is. The FAO has asked that the
>>practice be stopped. Millions of hectares of tropical forest
>>are currently being cut in order to produce tropical oils for
>>bio-diesel. It has been calculated that it will take 97 years for
>>this diesel to make up for the CO2 vented from the burning forest.
>
>
> Complete bullshit. Rain forest and Sugar Cane are not even grown in the
> same habitat. Provide a legitimate cite where forest is being burned.
>
> No surprise that you don't have a cite for your fairy tale. Is making
> things up all you're capable of?
>
>
>
I said tropical oils dummy. As in paslm kernal.
> paslm kernal.
Psalms?
http://news.mongabay.com/2007/1016-amazon.html
>>
>> No surprise that you don't have a cite for your fairy tale. Is making
>> things up all you're capable of?
>
> I said tropical oils you dummy not sugar cane palm kernal oil!!!!
Yes,
"The Lord is my Sheperd, I shall not want for I walk in the valley of
death...ashes to ashes, dust to dust, my cup runneth over....etc etc etc"
I said tropical oils for bio deisel not sugar cane you
big dummy. Thats palm kernal oil.
I said tropical oils i.e. palm kernel oil not
sugar cane you big dummy!