Hello,
I think there is a focus on public clouds. I agree that these clouds
are the most challenging but shouldn't we try to be comprehensive and
include private and hybrid clouds as well. My remark comes from the
fact that it is clearly stated that it is not possible to establish a
perimeter. I believe that building a perimeter is possible on private
clouds for instance.
Anyway, I agree that encryption and key management are the answers for
the confidentiality of data (in transit and at rest) but in the case
of private and hybrid clouds as well.
We should protect the confidentiality of data from external and
internal sources.
Then there is a paragraph on integrity. This is a very important
problem that i did not clearly find in the other domains but I was not
expecting to find it here because I tend to think about Message
Authentication Codes (MACs) and hash functions and not encryption.
Finally, we need keys to perform all these techniques. In my opinion
this is the field where we're missing solutions and that we should
focus on. Cloud computing brings scalability and the opportunity of
separation of roles as stated in the document. We should open the
discussion and i hope not fall on discussion about the pros and cons
of PKIs. A good starting point to understand obstacles to PKI adoption
can be found in :
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?
wg_abbrev=pki
To conclude, some of the questions I would like to see adressed:
-Are PKIs the answer to key management? If not, why and is there any
alternatives?
-How do we manage separation of roles and trust within the same
company or between partners or other scenarios including third party
service providers?
-How to deal with geolocalization of data and legal restrictions to
encryption?
-How do we manage key escrow?
Thanks
Sergio
http://elastic-security.com/