Hi Dennis,
Thank you for the feedback.
I think it is very good you are able to approach CloudI as a
solution, despite the problem with your manager/supervisor. I
understand that it might seem like the format of the web page would
change the situation, but I really don't think it will.
I really enjoy the stability of
http://openbsd.org/ (for more than
10 years now) but their web site looks older than the others you
have mentioned since it lacks the typical marketing look. What a
manager/supervisor would care about more is just seeing other
corporate usage, so that it looks like limited business risk. With
the BSD license, no users necessarily need to report how or why they
use CloudI, which is part of the benefit to having the BSD license.
The license would of course not stop any type of repository fork or
a separate project based on CloudI.
Changing the web page to try and appeal to people without
technological knowledge does not seem necessary, to me. Usage of
CloudI will require some technical knowledge, so it seems better to
avoid the helpless and the clueless which might otherwise detract
from the direction of the project. You might see this as a negative
view, but based on experience in open source, it helps the projects
retain quality.
That being said, I am open to suggestions on how to improve the web
site. The images are already being used elsewhere, so those are
part of a logo that will remain, just like the URL
(
http://cloudi.org). The github page can always forward to the
cloudi.org site. The web site could be done on a single page, to
increase the trendiness factor, but I think having a
clinical/sterile look like the pages you previously listed might
make the project look a bit dead and lacking in innovation. That is
definitely not the message I would want to present. However, that
is probably what your manager/supervisor is looking for.
Thanks,
Michael