Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a few changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags (copyright, standard track, etc).
Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
I'm ready if Samuel is.
-cmort
The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a few changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags (copyright, standard track, etc).
Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
drafts) on the page and then deployment.
> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku
> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
> I'm ready if Samuel is.
> -cmort
> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a few
> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
> (copyright, standard track, etc).
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
> now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
> drafts) on the page and then deployment.
> //Samuel
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
> <cmortim...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku
>> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>> -cmort
>> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a few
>> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
>> (copyright, standard track, etc).
>Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we
>will update the page.
>If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It
>still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to
>improve it.
>Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
>Cheers
>//Samuel
>On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
>> now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
>> drafts) on the page and then deployment.
>> //Samuel
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
>> <cmortim...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>>> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the
>>>Heroku
>>> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>>> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>>> -cmort
>>> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a
>>>few
>>> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
>>> (copyright, standard track, etc).
> Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we
> will update the page.
> If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It
> still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to
> improve it.
> Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
> Cheers
> //Samuel
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
>> now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
>> drafts) on the page and then deployment.
>> //Samuel
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
>> <cmortim...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>>> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku
>>> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>>> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>>> -cmort
>>> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a few
>>> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
>>> (copyright, standard track, etc).
>> Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we
>> will update the page.
>> If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It
>> still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to
>> improve it.
>> Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
>> Cheers
>> //Samuel
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
>>> Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
>>> now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
>>> drafts) on the page and then deployment.
>>> //Samuel
>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
>>> <cmortim...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>>>> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku
>>>> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>>>> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>>>> -cmort
>>>> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a few
>>>> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
>>>> (copyright, standard track, etc).
However I should not take all the credit, Erik and Daniel has helped a
lot and we have been using Bootstrap from Twitter
(http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/) for most components.
Cheers
//Samuel
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Darran Rolls (SailPoint)
>>> Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we
>>> will update the page.
>>> If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It
>>> still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to
>>> improve it.
>>> Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
>>> Cheers
>>> //Samuel
>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
>>>> Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
>>>> now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
>>>> drafts) on the page and then deployment.
>>>> //Samuel
>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
>>>> <cmortim...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>>>>> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the
>>>>> Heroku
>>>>> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>>>>> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>>>>> -cmort
>>>>> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a
>>>>> few
>>>>> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
>>>>> (copyright, standard track, etc).
> However I should not take all the credit, Erik and Daniel has helped a
> lot and we have been using Bootstrap from Twitter
> (http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/) for most components.
> Cheers
> //Samuel
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Darran Rolls (SailPoint)
> <darranro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Nice! Super clean layout - are you available for general web design :-)
>> On 8/20/12 10:16 AM, Chuck Mortimore wrote:
>>> Thanks Samuel - great work
>>> - cmort
>>> On Aug 20, 2012, at 12:43 AM, "Samuel Erdtman" <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
>>>> Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we
>>>> will update the page.
>>>> If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It
>>>> still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to
>>>> improve it.
>>>> Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
>>>> Cheers
>>>> //Samuel
>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
>>>>> Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
>>>>> now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
>>>>> drafts) on the page and then deployment.
>>>>> //Samuel
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
>>>>> <cmortim...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>>>>>> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the
>>>>>> Heroku
>>>>>> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>>>>>> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>>>>>> -cmort
>>>>>> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a
>>>>>> few
>>>>>> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
>>>>>> (copyright, standard track, etc).
While the site itself is - more or less - a prettified link to the specifications I personally found the Compliance Test to be very helpful.
I really would love to see more work done for this tool.
Especially I would like be informed in more detail what was tested and maybe an example of why a test fails. This might be helpful when I hit another failed test for an "Unkown Test".
-----Original Message-----
From: cloud-directory@googlegroups.com [mailto:cloud-directory@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Trey Drake
Sent: Montag, 20. August 2012 19:20
To: cloud-directory@googlegroups.com
Cc: Chuck Mortimore; Trey Drake
Subject: Re: 1.1 has not been posted on www.simplecloud.info
Thanks Samuel - looks fantastic. Gotta love Bootstrap.
Thanks,
Trey
On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
> Thanks a lot!
> However I should not take all the credit, Erik and Daniel has helped a
> lot and we have been using Bootstrap from Twitter
> (http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/) for most components.
> Cheers
> //Samuel
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Darran Rolls (SailPoint)
> <darranro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Nice! Super clean layout - are you available for general web design :-)
>> On 8/20/12 10:16 AM, Chuck Mortimore wrote:
>>> Thanks Samuel - great work
>>> - cmort
>>> On Aug 20, 2012, at 12:43 AM, "Samuel Erdtman" <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
>>>> Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we
>>>> will update the page.
>>>> If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It
>>>> still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to
>>>> improve it.
>>>> Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
>>>> Cheers
>>>> //Samuel
>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> wrote:
>>>>> Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
>>>>> now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
>>>>> drafts) on the page and then deployment.
>>>>> //Samuel
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
>>>>> <cmortim...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>>>>>> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the
>>>>>> Heroku
>>>>>> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>>>>>> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>>>>>> -cmort
>>>>>> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a
>>>>>> few
>>>>>> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
>>>>>> (copyright, standard track, etc).
On Aug 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Christian Metz wrote:
While the site itself is - more or less - a prettified link to the specifications I personally found the Compliance Test to be very helpful.
I really would love to see more work done for this tool.
Especially I would like be informed in more detail what was tested and maybe an example of why a test fails. This might be helpful when I hit another failed test for an "Unkown Test".
-----Original Message-----
From: cloud-directory@googlegroups.com<mailto:cloud-directory@googlegroups.com> [mailto:cloud-directory@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Trey Drake
Sent: Montag, 20. August 2012 19:20
To: cloud-directory@googlegroups.com<mailto:cloud-directory@googlegroups.com>
Thanks Samuel - looks fantastic. Gotta love Bootstrap.
Thanks,
Trey
On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se<mailto:sam...@erdtman.se>> wrote:
Thanks a lot!
However I should not take all the credit, Erik and Daniel has helped a
lot and we have been using Bootstrap from Twitter
(http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/) for most components.
Cheers
//Samuel
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Darran Rolls (SailPoint)
<darranro...@gmail.com<mailto:darranro...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Nice! Super clean layout - are you available for general web design :-)
On 8/20/12 10:16 AM, Chuck Mortimore wrote:
Thanks Samuel - great work
- cmort
On Aug 20, 2012, at 12:43 AM, "Samuel Erdtman" <sam...@erdtman.se<mailto:sam...@erdtman.se>> wrote:
Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we
will update the page.
If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It
still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to
improve it.
Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
Cheers
//Samuel
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se<mailto:sam...@erdtman.se>> wrote:
Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
drafts) on the page and then deployment.
//Samuel
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
<cmortim...@salesforce.com<mailto:cmortim...@salesforce.com>> wrote:
On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the
Heroku
hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
I'm ready if Samuel is.
-cmort
The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a
few
changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
(copyright, standard track, etc).
I have a SCIM server running at https://ee.dy.fi Whenever I try to run Compliance Test it fails already on the web server without even reaching the application.
You can hit https://ee.dy.fi/v1/ServiceProviderConfigs with any browser.
Any clue?
> Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we > will update the page.
> If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It > still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to > improve it.
> Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
> Cheers > //Samuel
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but > > now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf > > drafts) on the page and then deployment.
> > //Samuel
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore > > <cmort...@salesforce.com <javascript:>> wrote:
> >> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
> >> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the > Heroku > >> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
> >> I'm ready if Samuel is.
> >> -cmort
> >> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a > few > >> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags > >> (copyright, standard track, etc).
We just made a small change to the simplecloud complence test. It now accepts self signed certificates. Try again.
Cheers
Erik & Samuel
On Nov 14, 2012, at 10:40 AM, jevgeni...@gmail.com<mailto:jevgeni...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Samuel,
I have a SCIM server running at https://ee.dy.fi Whenever I try to run Compliance Test it fails already on the web server without even reaching the application.
You can hit https://ee.dy.fi/v1/ServiceProviderConfigs with any browser.
Any clue?
Thanks,
Eugene
On Monday, August 20, 2012 10:43:08 AM UTC+3, Samuel Erdtman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se<javascript:>> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
> now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
> drafts) on the page and then deployment.
> //Samuel
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore
> <cmort...@salesforce.com<javascript:>> wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku
>> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>> -cmort
>> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a few
>> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags
>> (copyright, standard track, etc).
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012 2:17:13 PM UTC+2, Erik Wahlström wrote:
> Hi,
> We just made a small change to the simplecloud complence test. It now > accepts self signed certificates. Try again.
> Cheers
> Erik & Samuel
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 10:40 AM, jevge...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
> I have a SCIM server running at https://ee.dy.fi > Whenever I try to run Compliance Test it fails already on the web server > without even reaching the application.
> You can hit https://ee.dy.fi/v1/ServiceProviderConfigs with any browser.
> Any clue?
> Thanks,
> Eugene
> On Monday, August 20, 2012 10:43:08 AM UTC+3, Samuel Erdtman wrote:
>> Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we >> will update the page.
>> If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It >> still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to >> improve it.
>> Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.
>> Cheers >> //Samuel
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Erdtman <sam...@erdtman.se> >> wrote: >> > Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but >> > now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf >> > drafts) on the page and then deployment.
>> > //Samuel
>> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Chuck Mortimore >> > <cmort...@salesforce.com> wrote:
>> >> On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>> >> Yup. Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the >> Heroku >> >> hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?
>> >> I'm ready if Samuel is.
>> >> -cmort
>> >> The latest revs are linked below. Note that the below links reflect a >> few >> >> changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags >> >> (copyright, standard track, etc).
