In the same way that the common availability of JSON.parse obviates goog.json.parse, is localStorage ubiquitous enough to use instead of goog.storage.Storage?Assuming I don't care about IE6 etc...
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Closure Library Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to closure-library-d...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
much of Closure that wraps native APIs is attempting to abstract
browser differences. If you know you're working a set of browsers
where localStorage is present, no need to use.
Nathan
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:00 PM, John Munro <ghos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the same way that the common availability of JSON.parse obviates
> goog.json.parse, is localStorage ubiquitous enough to use instead of
> goog.storage.Storage?
>
> Assuming I don't care about IE6 etc...
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Closure Library Discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to closure-library-discuss+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to closure-library-d...@googlegroups.com.