Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Clojure
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Clojure Scoping Rules
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Meikel Brandmeyer  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21 2009, 4:37 pm
From: Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:37:03 +0100
Local: Sat, Nov 21 2009 4:37 pm
Subject: Re: Clojure Scoping Rules
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Hi,

Am 21.11.2009 um 05:22 schrieb Mark Engelberg:

> Which reminds me, every once in a while I see people talking about
> this here, and brainstorming up some alternatives to binding that
> might interact better with lazy data structures.  Has there been any
> real progress on this, or has every proposed solution been equally
> problematic?

I wrote up a little blog post on the problem and the possible  
solutions. Feedback welcome.

http://kotka.de/blog/clojure/Taming_the_Bound_Seq.html

Sincerely
Meikel

  smime.p7s
3K Download

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google