Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Erlang vs Clojure
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Robin  
View profile
 More options Nov 23 2007, 6:16 pm
From: Robin <robi...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 23 2007 6:16 pm
Subject: Re: Erlang vs Clojure
The ErlangVM has a scheduler and fly-weight processes on the order of
300 bytes each, so you can have hundreds of thousands of tasks in
flight on conventional hardware.

If I understand Clojure actors correctly, actors will not need a
dedicated stack, heap, or mailbox, so an actor could be as simple as a
reference (4 bytes on 32 bit machine), so you could theoretically have
tens of millions of actors in flight and process them with a
conventional thread pool?

Wow, can't wait to try it out.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google