ClojureDocs.org - Clojure

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Message from discussion ClojureDocs.org
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 64.68.200.141 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca) client-ip=64.68.200.141;
Message-Id: <E4DDC32B-C9D3-47A3-9A9C-EEB8BF2AF6DF@softaddicts.ca>
From: =?utf-8?Q?Luc_Pr=C3=A9fontaine?= <lprefonta...@softaddicts.ca>
To: "clojure@googlegroups.com" <clojure@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <3e60789d-5981-40a7-9884-134254921fde@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii;
	format=flowed;
	delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPod Mail 7D11)
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 20:18:40 -0400
References: <ffee1895-8625-4ed8-aba8-a8ef81974...@x1g2000prc.googlegroups.com>  <8ff9254a-d5d1-45ca-b7d7-80ebdfac3...@b35g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>  <d7f9fa76-21e2-4f6a-918a-187ff9e6f...@m21g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>  <3A56426A-DD7B-4466-A464-61FD42A19...@kinostudios.com> <f6fd48c5-ebf7-4a3d-bb49-c9e153876...@j4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>  <AANLkTim8mg-40Oxy9i50VkJ6Q8e_obTXYiap2lWAO...@mail.gmail.com>  <AANLkTiloc_ILjddZLfNYex0fjWOwRsCjY1iGRDmLI...@mail.gmail.com> <3e60789d-5981-40a7-9884-134254921...@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>

We use Rails for all our GUIs,
we need simple CRUD most of
the time and we ActiveScaffold.

Most of our controllers are less than
70 lines and we seldom write forms.

We use the ActiveScaffold partial
forms almost every were sometimes
custpmizing them.

Clojure Web Frameworks are not
there yet.
We monitor the situation however
and will change our mind as soon
as it looks promiding...

Zack, keep the focus on the problem
to solve :)))

Luc P.

Sent from my iPod

On 2010-07-11, at 19:31, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Rich-
>
>> It sounded to me like he was only saying that he's more familiar with
>> Ruby/Rails than he is with Clojure.
>
> Correct.  I think it was a fair question, and I'm happy to provide
> insights into my decision making process.
>
> -Zack
>
> On Jul 11, 12:37 pm, Richard Lyman <richard.ly...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org>  
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:23 PM, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>>> but what do you think about using Justin's codebase, or an Aleph- 
>>>>> based server to
>>>>> host the thing instead of Ruby/Rails? (see the link above for  
>>>>> more details)
>>
>>>> I'm inclined to move forward with the Ruby / Rails for now.  The
>>>> reason I went with rails is that (in my experience) none of the
>>>> clojure web libraries are mature enough to do something like
>>>> clojuredocs as quickly and easily as I personally would be able  
>>>> to do
>>>> in rails.
>>
>>> Could you provide details about what it was specifically that you
>>> found was lacking?
>>
>>> -Phil
>>
>> It sounded to me like he was only saying that he's more familiar with
>> Ruby/Rails than he is with Clojure. It seemed like it was a question
>> of 'time to finish and tweak' that's shortest for him if he wrote it
>> in Ruby/Rails.
>>
>> Maybe this is a good opportunity to be able to compare two
>> implementations side-by-side. His excellent solution with one written
>> in Clojure that produces the same-ish website.
>>
>> -Rich
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient  
> with your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
