On Feb 6, 2:42 pm, Laurent PETIT <
laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I could test the patch, it works really well. With it, no need to implement
> periodic polling, which is really a bad solution when on e can avoid it!
>
> Still don't know if there could be a performance impact that would require
> to have this as an optional behaviour.
>
> Rich, please do you think it is an acceptable patch ? If so, I'll then send
> my contributor agreement as needed, and open an issue.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> --
> Laurent
>