Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
ClojureDocs.org
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 53 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
zkim  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 4:32 am
From: zkim <zachary....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 4:32 am
Subject: ClojureDocs.org
Hi All,

I'll try to keep this short.

I've gotten a lot out of Clojure: I can honestly say that learning
this language, and being part of this community has made me a better,
happier developer, and I wanted to give something back.

One of the pain points that I encountered when learning the language
was a lack of examples specific to the individual functions I was
trying to wrap my head around at any given time. So I took a whack at
the problem, and came up with http://clojuredocs.org.  It's a site
that (I'm hoping) will fill this need by providing a centralized
examples database, along with solid search capabilities across both
core and third party libraries (core being the focus).

Implementation:
ClojureDocs.org is a rails site backed by MySQL, along with some
clojure code to pull the namespaces / metadata / source and dump them
into the database.

Highlights:
1. Documentation and source for Clojure core, contrib, and a few third
party libraries (random selection out of what I'm personally familiar
with, and whatever was on the github trends page that day).

2. Search for a var across the whole ecosystem or in a specific
library.

3. Per var wiki-style examples section.

4. Per var comments section.

5. Per var vars-in-this-var and this-var-used-in section (my personal
favorite).  Looking for a real-world example of a specific function?
This is for you. For example, http://clojuredocs.org/v/1978, just
below the source section.

Lowlights:
1. Ugly URLs!  There's a problem in the way that URLs with encoded
question marks are being handled, so I had to move from
http://clojuredocs.org/clj-ssh/clj-ssh.core/file-path to
http://clojuredocs.org/v/1484.  I've got an email out to the Phusion
Passenger mailing list (http://groups.google.com/group/phusion-
passenger/browse_thread/thread/ed2eadfdac5c166f) but if you've got any
experience in this area drop me a line.

2. Strange var names (http://clojuredocs.org/v/781).  Probably a bug
in the import process.

3. General rough-around-the-edges-ness.

I'm treating this as an alpha, and I'd really like feedback as to:
a. How useful this would be to the community.
b. Specific likes / dislikes about this alpha release.
c. Feature requests.

I've set up a feedback mechanism directly through the site (User
Voice), which allows voting on specific posts.  I'm also considering
setting up a google group for general discussion.  Feel free to
contact me directly through email.

Questions / thoughts?

-Zack


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Victor Olteanu  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 11:16 am
From: Victor Olteanu <bluestar...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:16:09 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 11:16 am
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org

I took a first look and I have to say that the idea is genius and I love
what you put up together this far.
It is difficult to keep up with what's happening in the Clojure world, and
this kind of central place to keep track of things was needed. The examples
are also a strong point.
I hope the site will grow with many people's contributions.

Victor


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lee Hinman  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 12:08 pm
From: Lee Hinman <l...@writequit.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:08:35 -0600
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 12:08 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:32 AM, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,

> Questions / thoughts?

> -Zack

Hi Zack,
First off, I think it looks great, and it definitely seems useful when
trying to find an example of a particular API call.

Few suggestions:
1. The headers for each section (Doc, Source, Example(s)) don't
differentiate themselves from the regular doc text enough, maybe
bold/underline/color them to make them show up more?
2. The links to the source code should link to
http://github.com/clojure/clojure, I believe the richhickey clojure
repo has been transitioned there.
3. I know non-confirmation logins are really nice, but should the site
attract any spammers, you may want to look at adding an email account
confirmation (since spammers could go nuts adding comments to pages).

Looks awesome, hope it gets some love from the Clojure community.

- Lee


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Nolen  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 12:21 pm
From: David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:21:52 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 12:21 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:32 AM, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Questions / thoughts?

> -Zack

This is great. I think the main thing is not duplicating effort. This and
clojure-examples.appspot.com should really join forces.

David


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
.Bill Smith  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 12:30 pm
From: ".Bill Smith" <william.m.sm...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 12:30 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Having contributed a lot of examples to clojure-examples.appspot.com
this week, I agree that it would be a shame to duplicate efforts.

On Jul 9, 11:21 am, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dmitry Kakurin  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 2:19 pm
From: Dmitry Kakurin <dmitry.kaku...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 2:19 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
It's a great idea, and the site looks very good.
Two suggestions:
1. Move examples section above source code section
2. Add OpenID sign in support. Personally I'm instantly repelled by
sites asking me to create another account/password. And I'm sure I'm
not alone. Stackoverflow.com is a great example of how effortless it
could be to "register".

- Dmitry

On Jul 9, 1:32 am, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alex Miller  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 2:25 pm
From: Alex Miller <alexdmil...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 2:25 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
I've actually been thinking about this exact same kind of site for a
while now and I'm thrilled that I was too lazy to do it so that you
could do it instead. :)

One idea that I have that I think would be killer would be to provide
an API to look up one your examples at the repl so I could do
something like:

=> (use 'clojuredocs)
=> (example map)
clojure.core/map (since 1.0)

(map inc [1 2 3 4 5])
(2 3 4 5 6)

There are of course many variants of some functions and different
forms of use, so dealing with the best way to provide useful help
without an overwhelming number of examples is tricky in the repl, but
I think worth doing.  Along with doc and source, I think example would
be a killer addition to allowing you to explore the libraries from the
comfort of your repl.

Alex

On Jul 9, 3:32 am, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Justin Kramer  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 2:44 pm
From: Justin Kramer <jkkra...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 2:44 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
I've told Zack that he is free to pull any examples from the wiki for
use on his site.

I don't know about collaboration beyond that. The wiki is open source
and written in Clojure; anyone is free to contribute/fork. At least
one person has expressed interest in making code contributions.

Zack, you had mentioned you planned to keep the source of your site
proprietary -- is that set in stone?

Justin

On Jul 9, 12:21 pm, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tom Faulhaber  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 4:06 pm
From: Tom Faulhaber <tomfaulha...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 4:06 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Quick thought: You probably don't want to include private vars.

On Jul 9, 1:32 am, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lee Hinman  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 12:11 pm
From: Lee Hinman <matthew.hin...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:11:34 -0600
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:32 AM, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,

> Questions / thoughts?

> -Zack

Hi Zack,
First off, I think it looks great, and it definitely seems useful when
trying to find an example of a particular API call.

Few suggestions:
1. The headers for each section (Doc, Source, Example(s)) don't
differentiate themselves from the regular doc text enough, maybe
bold/underline/color them to make them show up more?
2. The links to the source code should link to
http://github.com/clojure/clojure, I believe the richhickey clojure
repo has been transitioned there.
3. I know non-confirmation logins are really nice, but should the site
attract any spammers, you may want to look at adding an email account
confirmation (since spammers could go nuts adding comments to pages).

Looks awesome, hope it gets some love from the Clojure community.

- Lee


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
zkim  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 1:41 pm
From: zkim <zachary....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 10:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 1:41 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Thanks all for your kind words.  As to the specifics:

> The headers for each section (Doc, Source, Example(s)) don't
> differentiate themselves from the regular doc text enough, maybe
> bold/underline/color them to make them show up more?

I'd agree, I think the visual styling of the page will change a lot in
the near future based on feedback, for now I'll add underlining.

> The links to the source code should link to
> http://github.com/clojure/clojure, I believe the richhickey clojure
> repo has been transitioned there.

Will update.

> I know non-confirmation logins are really nice, but should the site
> attract any spammers, you may want to look at adding an email account
> confirmation (since spammers could go nuts adding comments to pages).

This is strictly for alpha, I'm currently going back and forth between
signups confirmed through email, or recaptcha (or both), but rounding
out the sign-up / login process is high on my list.

> This is great. I think the main thing is not duplicating effort. This and
> clojure-examples.appspot.com should really join forces.
> Having contributed a lot of examples to clojure-examples.appspot.com
> this week, I agree that it would be a shame to duplicate efforts.

I've been talking with Justin, and he's allowed me to pull examples
from his site (as well as given some great feedback).  I'm definitely
all for a collaborative effort.

Thanks, Zack.

On Jul 9, 10:30 am, ".Bill Smith" <william.m.sm...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
zkim  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 2:52 pm
From: zkim <zachary....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 2:52 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
I've put these suggestions up on the UserVoice page, I believe I got
all of them, but if I missed yours please add it yourself or let me
know.

Dimitri: I share your frustrations with having to remember yet another
login / password. Other than minor cosmetic fixes, improving the user
signup / login experience is at the top of my list.

Alex:  Example lookup from the REPL would be awesome.  As of now this
is a bit lower on the list until things stabilize around the site.

Side note: My responses don't seem to be showing up right away on the
mailing list, so they may appear out of order.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
zkim  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 3:07 pm
From: zkim <zachary....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 12:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 3:07 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org

Hi Justin, thanks again for the go-ahead to pull examples from
http://clojure-examples.appspot.com.

> Zack, you had mentioned you planned to keep the source of your site
> proprietary -- is that set in stone?

Definitely not set in stone.  As far as the site goes there's not much
Clojure going on there (rails / mysql), and I'd rather keep that part
closed for now so I can concentrate on moving from alpha to beta,
adding features, and fixing bugs.  The analyzer, which pulls
metadata / source from libraries, and inserts it into the database is
a different story.  Other than the fact that it's extremely hackish,
nothing's really stopping me from EPLing it in the near future.

You also mentioned an API / export process, which I think is a great
idea.  This would allow examples to be easily exported to prevent
vendor lock-in.

-Zack

On Jul 9, 12:44 pm, Justin Kramer <jkkra...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Gavin Heavyside  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 3:19 pm
From: Gavin Heavyside <ga...@heavyside.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:19:14 +0100
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org

On 9 July 2010 09:32, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Questions / thoughts?

Looks really good to me.  Could you display the version numbers for Clojure
and the libraries that the site covers?

Gavin


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Cromartie  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 4:55 pm
From: John Cromartie <jcromar...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 4:55 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Beautiful. I think this should become the official community place for
Clojure docs. Now who wants to integrate my :examples defn attribute
code :)

-John

On Jul 9, 4:32 am, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
zkim  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 5:47 pm
From: zkim <zachary....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Tom-

I kind of went back and forth on this.  Originally I only parsed out
public vars, but in a couple of instances I found that when tracing
through some code I would hit on private vars.

Perhaps a solution where private vars are hidden from normal flow
(browsing and searching) unless explicitly included by the user?

-Zack

On Jul 9, 2:06 pm, Tom Faulhaber <tomfaulha...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Justin Kramer  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 7:05 pm
From: Justin Kramer <jkkra...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 7:05 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
An "examples" function for the REPL that pulls from the wiki:

http://gist.github.com/470031

I'm sure something like it could be made for ClojureDocs.org once the
API is in place.

General comments on ClojureDocs.org: I think an important aspect of a
collaborative tool like this is quality control. There needs to be
people watching recent updates, making sure examples meet certain
standards (formatted correctly, idiomatic, etc.). To that end, a
complete list of recent updates (with diffs) to go along with the
short list on the homepage would be really nice.

Having a category-based outlines would also be nice. I have one here
for clojure.core, adapted from the Cheatsheet:

http://clojure-examples.appspot.com/clojure.core

Feel free to nab it.

FYI, I'll probably be implementing a mass export feature for the wiki,
so you could write a script or something to automate an import.

Awesome work, Zack.

Justin

On Jul 9, 2:25 pm, Alex Miller <alexdmil...@yahoo.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Greg  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 7:23 pm
From: Greg <g...@kinostudios.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 19:23:23 -0400
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 7:23 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
*argh*. well at least my email is now finally on the whitelist.

What do you guys think of some of the ideas presented in the "Solving Clojure's Documentation Problem Without Fragmentation" thread? (Which I sent shortly after this thread started, but ended up being posted several hours later).

https://groups.google.com/group/clojure/t/77fda1c7c95f5344

- Greg

P.S. clojuredoc.org might be irrelevant if you guys choose to collaborate on the same project, but what do you think about using Justin's codebase, or an Aleph-based server to host the thing instead of Ruby/Rails? (see the link above for more details)

On Jul 9, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Justin Kramer wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Meikel Brandmeyer  
View profile  
 More options Jul 10 2010, 1:57 am
From: Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:57:33 +0200
Local: Sat, Jul 10 2010 1:57 am
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Hi,

Am 09.07.2010 um 23:47 schrieb zkim:

> I kind of went back and forth on this.  Originally I only parsed out
> public vars, but in a couple of instances I found that when tracing
> through some code I would hit on private vars.

I'm suspicious of showing source code to the reader with everything more than a small quite nondescript link. The contract is the docstring. Looking at the code might be interesting but non-helpful. You start relying on implementation details, while these might change at any time (eg. introduction of transients, etc.). I would *not* show the source code and I would *not* document private vars. They are not part of the contract and should not show up in public API documentation.

Sincerely
Meikel


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Heinz N. Gies  
View profile  
 More options Jul 10 2010, 5:11 am
From: "Heinz N. Gies" <he...@licenser.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:11:29 +0200
Local: Sat, Jul 10 2010 5:11 am
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Hi Zack,
first of all, great effort there :) having a place for clojure docs is awesome. Two things come to mind:

1) http://github.com/defn/walton - have a look at it, it might be a good way to fetch examples for functions where none are provided yet.

2) Will it be possible to put other 3rd party libs on there - since I'd like to add some of mine, it's likely better to have them documented centrally then keeping a own documentation for each library. :)

Regards,
Heinz


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Shantanu Kumar  
View profile  
 More options Jul 10 2010, 5:29 am
From: Shantanu Kumar <kumar.shant...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 02:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Jul 10 2010 5:29 am
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
This is great. One suggestion -- consider providing a downloadable
bundle for offline use as well.

Regards,
Shantanu

On Jul 10, 2:11 pm, "Heinz N. Gies" <he...@licenser.net> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
RobertLJ  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2010, 11:47 pm
From: RobertLJ <bobjohnso...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 9 2010 11:47 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
This is GREAT!!! I love the way you have opened it up for community
participation.

Robert

On Jul 9, 4:32 am, zkim <zachary....@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James Reeves  
View profile  
 More options Jul 10 2010, 8:45 am
From: James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 13:45:08 +0100
Local: Sat, Jul 10 2010 8:45 am
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
On 9 July 2010 21:06, Tom Faulhaber <tomfaulha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Quick thought: You probably don't want to include private vars.

Seconded. It's a little confusing seeing private vars and macros in
the API docs!

Other than that, this looks excellent. I'm signing up as I write this.

- James


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stuart Halloway  
View profile  
 More options Jul 10 2010, 10:06 am
From: Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:06:30 -0400
Local: Sat, Jul 10 2010 10:06 am
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
Very cool. Let me start by saying thanks to everyone who has been involved in the various threads on improving documentation, especially those who, like Zack, have taken substantial action.

Here are a bunch of ideas, in no particular order:

(1) Ease of contribution is huge, and http://clojuredocs.org looks good on this front. Stick to it.

(2) +1 on hiding private APIs. We use private APIs carefully and deliberately in Clojure, and I would hate to facilitate people writing code that will break later.

(3) +1 on making it very easy to see which version of an API you are looking at. This should be both at the top level (some way to say "show me 1.1") and on a per-var basis, reading the :added metadata.

(4) Provenance matters. Clojure itself is very careful to have people sign a CA before contributing code. The bar may be somewhat different for a documentation site, but it still needs to be carefully considered.

(5) Continuity matters. We have already had some pain with useful resources popping up on the web and then having the maintainer go AWOL with no succession plan. There are several steps any documentation site should take to address this: (a) open sourcing everything (b) including multiple committers and admins on the site itself and (c) providing an easy API to suck the data out.

(6) Because docstrings are designed for consumption at a REPL, they may in some cases presume a fixed font. Worth considering for display on the site.

(7) Quality matters. There are multiple possible ways to make sure that the cream rises: letting people up and downvote, making it easy for "editors" to track new submissions, etc.

Thanks again!

Stu


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James Reeves  
View profile  
 More options Jul 10 2010, 1:36 pm
From: James Reeves <jree...@weavejester.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:36:40 +0100
Local: Sat, Jul 10 2010 1:36 pm
Subject: Re: ClojureDocs.org
On 10 July 2010 15:06, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> (6) Because docstrings are designed for consumption at a REPL, they may in some cases presume a fixed font. Worth considering for display on the site.

What about giving function documentation the same "wiki" behaviour
that the examples have? Start off with the docstrings as the initial
values, but allow people to update them. The web allows longer and
better formatted documentation than a standard Clojure docstring
(which needs to fit in a terminal).

- James


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 53   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »