On Jul 2, 2:17 pm, Chouser <
chou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, is there any reason not to call this contrib-1.0? It seems to me that it
> would be most useful to have major contrib versions simply map to major clojure
> versions: contrib-1.a.x for clojure-1.a.y
The consensus on the dev list seemed to be that "Contrib 1.0" would
imply a degree of coherence and stability that many contrib libraries
have not yet achieved.
I'm happy to leave contrib as-is and let different parts evolve at
their own pace. Libraries that experience heavy use and minimal
changes can be nominated for inclusion with Clojure itself, as
recently happened to c.c.test-is.
But a JAR to include with the Clojure 1.0 distribution would be good.
Let people find out if anything is missing/broken in the contrib
branch, and then we can make one.
-SS