Am 14.07.2009 um 21:01 schrieb bgray:
> Ok, so *if* this is intended behavior, what have people been doing to
> bind variables dependant on other bindings? I can't be the first to
> run into this.
I haven't run into this, but there are two obvious approaches:
(let [new-a (compute n e w a)]
(binding [a new-a
b (inc new-a)]
[a b]))
(binding [a (comput n e w a)]
(binding [b (inc a)]
[a b]))
I'm not sure it's intended, though. Consistency between
the let-like forms and binding would be nice.
Sincerely
Meikel