The first step: renaming & deleting
Stuart Sierra
libs, and delete old ones.
Here's what I will do, if no one objects too violently:
* rename c.c.duck-streams => c.c.io
* rename c.c.seq-utils => c.c.seq
* rename c.c.java-utils => c.c.java
* rename c.c.str-utils3 => c.c.string
* rename c.c.shell-out => c.c.shell
* delete c.c.str-utils2
* delete c.c.str-utils
* delete c.c.json.read (replaced by c.c.json)
* delete c.c.json.write (replaced by c.c.json)
-SS
Sean Devlin
Go for it.
Sean
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure Dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to cloju...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure-dev...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure-dev?hl=en.
>
Stuart Sierra
> We have frozen versions of contrib 1.1, right?
Yes: frozen, packaged, and released.
-SS
Timothy Pratley
> First steps I see toward clojure.lib: give shorter names to popular
> libs, and delete old ones.
Nice move, I like it!
Should (seqable?) be moved from c.c.core to c.c.seq?
Konrad Hinsen
> First steps I see toward clojure.lib: give shorter names to popular
> libs, and delete old ones.
>
> Here's what I will do, if no one objects too violently:
...
inc
Konrad.
Laurent PETIT
Stuart Halloway
Timothy Pratley
http://www.assembla.com/spaces/clojure-contrib/tickets/56-Faster-version-of-reductions
Before the renaming occurs (should I trust git more?).
If I'm too late, happy to recreate - its an easy one just trying to
get it out of the way.
On 1 February 2010 05:30, Stuart Sierra <the.stua...@gmail.com> wrote: