You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Clojure Dev
Hi all,
I've created a doc for changes from 1.0 to 1.1. This is based on
Sean's list (thanks Sean!). I'll work on documenting things I
understand (transients, futures, bindings).
The document is editable by anyone, so I'm asking someone else to
document the things I don't totally understand (chunked sequences, ref
histories, promises).
-SS
Sean Devlin
unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 8:56:36 PM12/8/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Clojure Dev
It looks like the transients section is coming together well.
user=> (deliver this-droid "Help me Obi-wan Kenobi")
#<AFn$IDeref@12aeac28: "Help me Obi-wan Kenobi">
user=> @this-droid
"Help me Obi-wan Kenobi"
I ran this a separate time, like so:
user=> (def vader (promise))
#'user/promise-docs
user=> @vader ;force-choked the REPL
Have fun folks
Sean
On Dec 8, 11:08 am, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've created a doc for changes from 1.0 to 1.1. This is based on
> Sean's list (thanks Sean!). I'll work on documenting things I
> understand (transients, futures, bindings).
>
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Clojure Dev
Hey guys,
I took a shot at the futures & promises sections. Could some review
this and see that I got everything right?
Thanks,
Sean
On Dec 8, 8:56 pm, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It looks like the transients section is coming together well.
>
> Some hopefully useful links for the other topics:
>