> Clark does say that one of the things that killed Craft was the ACC being
> taken over by people who treated it as a commodity.
Commodification is one of the aspects of consumer society the
Mingei movement was working against.
> Future of Craft conference. His main thesis is that Craft died from the
> toxicity of art envy, overdosing on nostalgia. We also don't think
> critically about our work according to Clark.
The main premise of Leach's Potter's Book was "toward a
standard." And the preservation of traditional work was not
nostalgic, but was to protect local culture from the encroaching
commercial global culture that was engulfing the planet. William
Morris and Okakura Tenshin worked on these issues before Leach and
Yanagi.
It is easy to put Leach's criticism of our work back in the
'50s: we were not working from the foundations of craft that had
been opened up to us because of better communications and the
scholarship of the past that was available to us. If you don't
understand where your craft came from, you do not have a strong
foundation. This is a problem Leach saw in the studio arts programs
he visited.
--
Lee Love, Minneapolis
"The tea ceremony bowl is the ceramic equivalent of a sonnet: a
small-scale, seemingly constricted form that challenges the artist to
go beyond mere technical virtuosity and find an approach that both
satisfies and transcends the conventions." -- Rob Sliberman
full essay: http://togeika.multiply.com/journal/item/273/
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Randall Moody<randal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clark does say that one of the things that killed Craft was the ACC being
> taken over by people who treated it as a commodity.
Commodification is one of the aspects of consumer society the
Mingei movement was working against.
> Future of Craft conference. His main thesis is that Craft died from the
> toxicity of art envy, overdosing on nostalgia. We also don't think
> critically about our work according to Clark.
The main premise of Leach's Potter's Book was "toward a
standard." And the preservation of traditional work was not
nostalgic, but was to protect local culture from the encroaching
commercial global culture that was engulfing the planet. William
Morris and Okakura Tenshin worked on these issues before Leach and
Yanagi.
It is easy to put Leach's criticism of our work back in the
'50s: we were not working from the foundations of craft that had
been opened up to us because of better communications and the
scholarship of the past that was available to us. If you don't
understand where your craft came from, you do not have a strong
foundation. This is a problem Leach saw in the studio arts programs
he visited.
The thing of it is, though they are dead, they have left behind a
living tradition that I belong to. I find it severely amusing when
guys like Clark try to tell me about my life.
>
> ceramics last for long time....into the night.
>
> M.Wildenhain was a real piece of work. I argued with her endlessly..back
> in the 1970s..... about why she would never allow a machine/motor in her
> workshop..and yet threw with ....not her fingers....but ribs...in BOTH
> hands. HA! some folks are just hard to figure.....'purists' are never so
> pure as we assume.
I suppose the ultimate purist would eat the clay and then fire
their poop. Hahaha!
--
Lee Love in Minneapolis
http://mingeisota.blogspot.com/
"The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a
faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant
and has forgotten the gift." -- Albert Einstein
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.55/2301 - Release Date: 08/13/09 18:16:00
</HTML
Leach is dead..and Hamada too...let them rest in their own peace....they made their own history.....and you can make your own history. I will keep striving to make my own works...and speak softly.
ceramics last for long time....into the night.
M.Wildenhain was a real piece of work. I argued with her endlessly..back in the 1970s..... about why she would never allow a machine/motor in her workshop..and yet threw with ....not her fingers....but ribs...in BOTH hands. HA! some folks are just hard to figure.....'purists' are never so pure as we assume.


Hank, Ric,
While at San Jose State, Marguerite came to give a lecture. She showed some slides and one student prepared a kick wheel and a selection of tools like those she used and asked her for a demonstration. She was dressed in a matching jacket and skirt, not exactly throwing attire. He asked anyway and she said something to the effect that she was like of Picasso and would you ask Picasso to paint for you? As I recall.
She gave a powerful presentation but it was clear that there was only one way to do things, HER WAY. I think she did have an influence on a lot of people that she taught and I had heard from some over the years that they learned so much from her.
Ric, I really like your statement and Hank’s response.
Hank, really beautiful Chawan!!!
> Wasn't Ric's response fine? I did get some fine tea ware and sake things
> from the Jewel Creek firing. They made up for the really big stuff which did
> not make it. A severe test for me, yet I have given myself an extra year of
> hand building....... maybe I will catch on eventually.
What happened to the big stuff?
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Hank Murrow<hmu...@efn.org> wrote:
>
>> Wasn't Ric's response fine? I did get some fine tea ware and sake
>> things
>> from the Jewel Creek firing. They made up for the really big stuff
>> which did
>> not make it. A severe test for me, yet I have given myself an
>> extra year of
>> hand building....... maybe I will catch on eventually.
>
> What happened to the big stuff?
It collapsed, failed structurally, extrusions too thin, Slabs not
joined well enough, someone put my guinomi on the servers without
wadding, I had stepped away to pee and did not notice when I
returned. All the usual stuff a beginner would experience.
Occasionally I can convince myself that it's good to be 'back in
school'!
I will send you a pic.......
Hank
\
> Clark attacks things so far beyond his area of expertise you would
> think he is the Don Quixote of ceramics, tilting at windmills.
I have respect for Wildenhain because she WAS a maker. Clark
is speaking at the American Craft Council conference this fall,
Creating A New Craft Culture. When you look at the list of speakers,
it is mostly university people and partime potters. The ls of those
attending is primarily curators and gallery owners. It is a bit
pricey for me.
Clarks presentation:
The Case For Conservatism
Garth Clark
For decades, craft institutions have been favoring the outer edges of
craft, its hybrid manifestations, in which craft is channeled through
design and fine art at the expense of the more traditional crafters
who have slowly become invisible outside the craft show circuit. In
the process, far from improving the medium’s place in the visual arts,
its “brand” in the visual arts marketplace has been corrupted and
diminished. As a follow-up to Garth Clark’s controversial lecture “How
Envy Killed the Crafts,” he now examines a list of dos and don’ts for
craft’s survival at a perilous time and navigates some of the barriers
to a contemporary craft revival in the United States.
--
Lee Love in Minneapolis
> them in the 20th century at least in regards to the ideology. The Mengei
> Movement, the Arts and Crafts Movement are all dead. Craft is now shuffling
> around crying "Bring out your dead!"
Randall, your ideas just don't match up to the facts.
The big problem with modern fine art, is hubris, is its lack
of acknowledgment of the "shoulders of Giants that we stand upon."
What is dead is Clark's gallery in New York. When the stock market
bubble burst, folks became more careful about what they bought.
Living craft is going strong in many parts of America.
We have a living, burgeoning tradition here in the upper Midwest.
They aren't doing too bad in the N.West and in N. Carolina either.
It is the rootless artists that are having a hard time.
Clark is speaking at the ACC converence here in the Twin Cities
this fall. Take a look at all the vibrate craft organizations they
will tour during the conference:
http://www.craftcouncil.org/conference09/?page_id=61
The Case For Conservatism
Garth Clark
For decades, craft institutions have been favoring the outer edges of
craft, its hybrid manifestations, in which craft is channeled through
design and fine art at the expense of the more traditional crafters
who have slowly become invisible outside the craft show circuit. In
the process, far from improving the medium’s place in the visual arts,
its “brand” in the visual arts marketplace has been corrupted and
diminished. As a follow-up to Garth Clark’s controversial lecture “How
Envy Killed the Crafts,” he now examines a list of dos and don’ts for
craft’s survival at a perilous time and navigates some of the barriers
to a contemporary craft revival in the United States.
--
>
> Hank,
> I thought Ric's response was fabulous! Sorry to see your platter
> was ripped
> asunder! I have had bad luck with large platters when I have fired
> them.
>
> Did you fire with Jen Lee at Jewel Creek? I know that she fires at
> Jewel
> Creek from time to time.
Yes, Jennifer was an invaluable part of an excellent crew, and her
work stood out among even the successful pieces.
Austin, and Chris, Amy, Scott, Moko Hotori, and Ken Pincus were among
the Portland Contingent. The Eugene/UofO contingent was myself, James
Laub, Art Nersesian, Michael Morris, Deborah Haynes, Bill Welch.....
with Ken O'Connell, Bob James, Bob Wenger, and David Stannard
arriving for Saturday Fun. Tom Kearcher oversaw the firing, as it is
his kiln.... and a sweet, 100-hour firing was the result.
Cheers, Hank
Hi all! Happy weekend!
This is interesting on an interesting web site -- an opaque white matte glaze with "Horse-tooth stone". Theories anyone?
See: Ceramics in Mainland Southeast Asia at http://seasianceramics.asia.si.edu/materials/subgroup.asp?key=11
(about mid-way down the article).
Nice note by Louis Katz in the comments section.
Maybe you all already know of this but it is a "new" publication to me.
On a happy note I got my clay-joy back and as a bonus discovered an unlimited supply of great oak wood ash (got 7% in a red clay body to try now, it feels nice and workability is better with the wood ash addition). Got over being incensed at being called a "commodity" by a guy (thanks for mentioning commodity in recent discussions -- now I know where that came from -- it had seemed a tad far out there to suit me). Decided to craft my vessels and forms to the best of my ability and not give a hoot if they are called art, craft, or junk. All-in-all I'm having a fine time here and hope you all are, too. The stories from earlier days are good -- keep 'um coming.
I am puzzling over why wheel-throwers sometimes have an ackward time of it during handbuilding. Probably the number one thing I have noticed is timidity. You all work with tremendous forces and have them working for you on the wheel. So maybe go jerk your clay around and be a little more aggressive. You drop many pounds of clay on a wheel, beat on it, manhandle it, cone it up and down, center it, etc. In handbuilding one can slam or drop a work and thus center it, rebuilding and recovering form afterward if necessary. I always smooth the insides of vessels as nicely as I do the outside, this compresses and solidifies the clay from both sides. I apply considerable force to the clay during some aspects of handbuilding. As you must be doing on the wheel (so it seems to me by observing throwers), you should be able to tell if a work will survive drying and firing by feel. If balanced to itself (and properly made) a work should survive anything with
additions in almost any direction or at any angle. Keeping a uniform thickness is not just good for better drying or firing success it helps make angles and curves more doable -- clay can't bend, move, and keep its shape if it is backed by a "caulked-in" weld of excess clay. I do wish I could be more helpful because handbuilding is tons of fun. The right tools for the job and stage of clay wetness also help; handbuilders seem to have more tools than I've seen wheel-throwers here use. I don't know. But to me it is an interesting question. Hope you all don't mind the comments. What you all do is somewhat mysterious to me since I don't wheel-throw. I keep debating about learning but then end up asking why (for me).
Marian |
Just observations, no lesson. I don't want to give lessons, just share a little something from time to time.
But I have wondered when in communal settings. Clay is clay and the principles, if not the methods, have always been the same.
In one class I took the wheel-throwers were kept separate from handbuilders. That seemed to foster a lot of ill-will I was at a loss to understand. In another class we were all intermingled and I enjoyed watching and learning from those at work on the wheel and vice-versa.
Marian
|
From: Eric Alan Hansen kansas...@gmail.com |
|
|