Nick, this is awesome. It's like a dream come true to see this working
so smoothly.
I know it's working because the current dev channel has the #EOF
things at the bottom that raf recently removed but didn't make the cut
for dev. If you look at trunk, they aren't there :).
BTW, you made sure to use different cache tokens for the URLs in each
branch, right? (they won't clobber each other?)
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Nick, this is awesome. It's like a dream come true to see this working
> so smoothly.
> I know it's working because the current dev channel has the #EOF
> things at the bottom that raf recently removed but didn't make the cut
> for dev. If you look at trunk, they aren't there :).
Yeah, windows.html will work as soon as Raf's fix makes it to the dev
channel.
> BTW, you made sure to use different cache tokens for the URLs in each
> branch, right? (they won't clobber each other?)
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Nick, this is awesome. It's like a dream come true to see this working
> > so smoothly.
> > I know it's working because the current dev channel has the #EOF
> > things at the bottom that raf recently removed but didn't make the cut
> > for dev. If you look at trunk, they aren't there :).
> Yeah, windows.html will work as soon as Raf's fix makes it to the dev
> channel.
> > BTW, you made sure to use different cache tokens for the URLs in each
> > branch, right? (they won't clobber each other?)
> On Sep 8, 2:19 pm, Nick Baum <nickb...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > Nick, this is awesome. It's like a dream come true to see this working
>> > so smoothly.
>> > I know it's working because the current dev channel has the #EOF
>> > things at the bottom that raf recently removed but didn't make the cut
>> > for dev. If you look at trunk, they aren't there :).
>> Yeah, windows.html will work as soon as Raf's fix makes it to the dev
>> channel.
>> > BTW, you made sure to use different cache tokens for the URLs in each
>> > branch, right? (they won't clobber each other?)