On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Lei Zhang <thes
...@chromium.org> wrote:
> You need to give more info. What revision of the source code are you
> at? Did you make any local changes?
> FWIW, we have a Jaunty build bot on the experimental waterfall and it built
> ok.
> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall.fyi/builders/Chromium%20...<http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall.fyi/builders/Chromium%20...>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Ibrar Ahmed<ibrar.ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am getting error while compiling on ubuntu 9.04 (64bit)
> /home/ibrar/Google/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/css/CSSParser.cp p:
> > In function 'int WebCore::cssValueKeywordID(const
> > WebCore::CSSParserString&)':
> /home/ibrar/Google/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/css/CSSParser.cp p:4947:
> > error: expected initializer before '*' token
> /home/ibrar/Google/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/css/CSSParser.cp p:4948:
> > error: 'hashTableEntry' was not declared in this scope
> > Compiling
> /home/ibrar/Google/chromium/src/sconsbuild/Debug/obj/third_party/WebKit/Web Core/css/CSSPropertyLonghand.o
> > scons: ***
> [/home/ibrar/Google/chromium/src/sconsbuild/Debug/obj/third_party/WebKit/We bCore/css/CSSParser.o]
> > Error 1
> > scons: building terminated because of errors.
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Hunnter2k3 <Hunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Ever since V2 has been pushed, the CPU usage for Chrome has sky-
> >> rocketed every time i am loading pages.
> >> Every time a page is loading, both cores are hitting 100%.
> >> Worse is when sites are lagging or slow, the CPU is still at 100%
> >> until it is finished, no ifs or buts.
> >> I even done a fresh install, I even installed SRWare's Iron, it still
> >> hits 100% when a page loads.
> >> If this is what V2 is going to be like, i am going straight back to
> >> V1, i don't want a browser eating 100% and interrupting other
> >> processes, especially if it is because of a feature i couldn't care
> >> less about.
> >> Is this what has happened to Full Page Zoom now, instead of generating
> >> it each time a person wants to zoom?
> >> If so, for the love of everything decent, please go back to the old
> >> system, i don't care for FPZ and never will, or at least start using
> >> that wonderful thing called Options and add it in there, please.
> > --
> > Ibrar Ahmed
--