                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of x.solarwin...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.41;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2k3vxdsz2....@eric-mbp.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <69fbde76-4b76-49e1-863d-ab1cff3a6323@googlegroups.com>
 <CAN2+EpYUMKidWP3F5XKaxk9JdCdvFRP=5Emwz1P5=-nsA+w...@mail.gmail.com> <m2k3vxdsz2....@eric-mbp.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
From: V G <x.solarwin...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:27:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGSooMNtWm0KxSq=Ka1m-m4b1pPDTu8qjDtNt9gjbOq=V0b...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cherrypy-users] Why OpenERP team had chosen CherryPy?
To: cherrypy-users@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502e5db16d27f04c9a387ec

--00504502e5db16d27f04c9a387ec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Eric Larson <e...@ionrock.org> wrote:

> In other words, in my experience, as things get more difficult or out of
> the ordinary, when you've hit the edges of what is trivial and/or
> typical, CherryPy will still be a great platform to make progress on
> solving your problems. Django (and many full featured web frameworks)
> may start to break down, where the code that helped, now has become a
> bottleneck. This is not a damning criticism as some developers are
> really good at unwrapping and adapting a framework. I personally prefer
> building the stack over unwrapping and adapting.
>

WOW. Could not have said that better myself. This applies tremendously to
many different frameworks and platforms.

--00504502e5db16d27f04c9a387ec
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Eric Larson <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:e...@ionrock.org" target=3D"_blank">e...@ionrock.org</a>&gt;</sp=
an> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" =
style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div class=3D"im">In other words, in my experience, as things get more diff=
icult or out of</div>
the ordinary, when you&#39;ve hit the edges of what is trivial and/or<br>
typical, CherryPy will still be a great platform to make progress on<br>
solving your problems. Django (and many full featured web frameworks)<br>
may start to break down, where the code that helped, now has become a<br>
bottleneck. This is not a damning criticism as some developers are<br>
really good at unwrapping and adapting a framework. I personally prefer<br>
building the stack over unwrapping and adapting.<br></blockquote><div><br><=
/div><div>WOW. Could not have said that better myself. This applies tremend=
ously to many different frameworks and platforms.=A0</div></div>

--00504502e5db16d27f04c9a387ec--