What plugins are you running?
Jim
Yes, for cfm and cfc files
On Jul 10, 4:43 pm, "Jim Priest" <pri...@thecrumb.com> wrote:
> Interesting - line numbers, etc. showing up OK???
list is kinda ugly but basically
>
> What plugins are you running?
>
Aptana
CF Frameworks 1.0.0
CFEclipse 1.3.2.betaColdFusion Extenstions for Eclipse 1.0.191910
MXUnit Test Runner
Mylyn
Subclipse
FusionDebug
and some odd stuff like regexutil, antexplorer, etc
Jim
Only thing I use Aptana for is the CSS editor. If I could find
something similar I'd dump it too. I've tried the WTP or whatever
it's called but the CSS edit in that didn't offer content assist like
Aptana.
Jim
yeah, i did the WTP in hopes of getting rid of Aptana for the CSS
stuff. Unfortunately, the WTP CSS editor is way too basic. I did
discover that I dig their XML editor tho, so that was kind of a win.
still searching for something to make me stop thinking about
installing Aptana for CSS :(
--
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's
wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I
thought you looked a bit off."
> You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 I've
> done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only thing I
> thought about today (after a couple of months of using 3.4) was jQuery
> support in the javascript tools, but I can live with the "errors" because it
> doesn't understand jQuery javascript.
>
> Stephen
tried JSEclipse for JS? even when I had Aptana installed for CSS, i
used JSEclipse for JS.
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/jseclipse/
Weird. Works fine for me. 3.4-- well, pretty close to you, but with
UML and TPTP and whatnot... quickrex instead of regexutil...
We can replicate a clean install during the build process by clearing
the runtime workspace metadata... if I take a stab at that "quick"
word wrap fix I'll see what happens when I turn that setting on. Or,
better, I'll make a new runtime just for testing that. Yup. That's
the ticket!
--
A prince should therefore have no other aim or thought, nor take up
any other thing for his study but war and it's organization and
discipline, for that is the only art that is necessary to one who
commands.
Niccolo Machiavelli
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:54 PM, denstar <vallia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Stephen Moretti wrote:
>> You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 I've
>> done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only thing I
>> thought about today (after a couple of months of using 3.4) was jQuery
>> support in the javascript tools, but I can live with the "errors" because it
>> doesn't understand jQuery javascript.
>
> You set up the built-in JSDT stuff? Comes with JEE, and It should do
> auto-jQuery whatnots too, once you get the sources and whathaveyou
> linked in there.
>
> It is a bitch, so I should blog it.
>
> Man... =]
>
> JSEdit is easier, but man, check out JSDT's options! Nice.
>
> :Den
> --
> He who has not first laid his foundations may be able with great
> ability to lay them afterwards, but they will be laid with trouble to
> the architect and danger to the building.
> Niccolo Machiavelli,
>
You set up the built-in JSDT stuff? Comes with JEE, and It should do
Mike Benner
pipelineSuite.com
I really find Aptana's JS editor heads and shoulders better than anything
else out there. I use Aptana for any of my CSS and JS files. I had tried a
number of JS editors in the past and really never found something I really
liked until I found Aptana. I guess different strokes for different folks.
:)
-Dan
I agree that Aptana's better than JSEclipse, but JSEclipse is still
very very good. And JSEclipse doesn't try to take over my Eclipse
install by putting a "message inbox" or "upgrade to pro" in my chrome.
Shame there's still no other decent CSS editor.
I barely notice those things in my chrome--and I'm willing to live with it
since it's free.
I guess for me the benefits far out way any disadvantages.
-Dan