I upgraded Eclipse from 3.3 to 3.4. Zipped up my eclipse folder and
dropped in the 3.4 stuff. Opened Eclipse up everything was broke
(views, resources, etc.) so through the command prompt I navigated to
the eclipse folder and run "eclipse -clean". Everything seems fine
now. Even running CFEclipse 1.3.2 beta.
The clean argument deletes any cached eclipse data, basically alows
eclipse to start fresh.
On Jul 10, 4:43 pm, "Jim Priest" <pri...@thecrumb.com> wrote:
> Interesting - line numbers, etc. showing up OK???
Yes, for cfm and cfc files
> What plugins are you running?
list is kinda ugly but basically
Aptana
CF Frameworks 1.0.0
CFEclipse 1.3.2.beta
ColdFusion Extenstions for Eclipse 1.0.191910
MXUnit Test Runner
Mylyn
Subclipse
FusionDebug
and some odd stuff like regexutil, antexplorer, etc
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Mike Henke <henkem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I upgraded Eclipse from 3.3 to 3.4. Zipped up my eclipse folder and
> > dropped in the 3.4 stuff. Opened Eclipse up everything was broke- Hide quoted text -
> On Jul 10, 4:43 pm, "Jim Priest" <pri...@thecrumb.com> wrote: > > Interesting - line numbers, etc. showing up OK???
> Yes, for cfm and cfc files
> > What plugins are you running?
> list is kinda ugly but basically > Aptana > CF Frameworks 1.0.0 > CFEclipse 1.3.2.beta > ColdFusion Extenstions for Eclipse 1.0.191910 > MXUnit Test Runner > Mylyn > Subclipse > FusionDebug > and some odd stuff like regexutil, antexplorer, etc
You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 I've done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only thing I thought about today (after a couple of months of using 3.4) was jQuery support in the javascript tools, but I can live with the "errors" because it doesn't understand jQuery javascript.
I just downloaded Ganymede JEE version and installed 1.3.2beta and so far (haven't done other plugins yet) it has line numbers and folding, but no "content assist", but I never used it anyway, I just keep cfdocs AIR app running for reference when I need it.
On Jul 10, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Stephen Moretti wrote:
> On Jul 10, 4:43 pm, "Jim Priest" <pri...@thecrumb.com> wrote: > > Interesting - line numbers, etc. showing up OK???
> Yes, for cfm and cfc files
> > What plugins are you running?
> list is kinda ugly but basically > Aptana > CF Frameworks 1.0.0 > CFEclipse 1.3.2.beta > ColdFusion Extenstions for Eclipse 1.0.191910 > MXUnit Test Runner > Mylyn > Subclipse > FusionDebug > and some odd stuff like regexutil, antexplorer, etc
> You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 > I've done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only > thing I thought about today (after a couple of months of using 3.4) > was jQuery support in the javascript tools, but I can live with the > "errors" because it doesn't understand jQuery javascript.
<stephen.more...@gmail.com> wrote: > You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 I've > done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only thing I
Only thing I use Aptana for is the CSS editor. If I could find something similar I'd dump it too. I've tried the WTP or whatever it's called but the CSS edit in that didn't offer content assist like Aptana.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Jim Priest <pri...@thecrumb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Stephen Moretti > <stephen.more...@gmail.com> wrote: >> You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 I've >> done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only thing I
> Only thing I use Aptana for is the CSS editor. If I could find > something similar I'd dump it too. I've tried the WTP or whatever > it's called but the CSS edit in that didn't offer content assist like > Aptana.
yeah, i did the WTP in hopes of getting rid of Aptana for the CSS stuff. Unfortunately, the WTP CSS editor is way too basic. I did discover that I dig their XML editor tho, so that was kind of a win.
still searching for something to make me stop thinking about installing Aptana for CSS :(
-- A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off."
<stephen.more...@gmail.com> wrote: > You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 I've > done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only thing I > thought about today (after a couple of months of using 3.4) was jQuery > support in the javascript tools, but I can live with the "errors" because it > doesn't understand jQuery javascript.
> Stephen
tried JSEclipse for JS? even when I had Aptana installed for CSS, i used JSEclipse for JS.
-- A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off."
update: Michael Benner is correct, i don't have "content assist" with
1.3.2.beta, guess it is back to the stable CFEclipse version I can't
live without like him :-)
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mike Henke wrote:
> update: Michael Benner is correct, i don't have "content assist" with > 1.3.2.beta, guess it is back to the stable CFEclipse version I can't > live without like him :-)
Weird. Works fine for me. 3.4-- well, pretty close to you, but with UML and TPTP and whatnot... quickrex instead of regexutil...
We can replicate a clean install during the build process by clearing the runtime workspace metadata... if I take a stab at that "quick" word wrap fix I'll see what happens when I turn that setting on. Or, better, I'll make a new runtime just for testing that. Yup. That's the ticket!
-- A prince should therefore have no other aim or thought, nor take up any other thing for his study but war and it's organization and discipline, for that is the only art that is necessary to one who commands. Niccolo Machiavelli
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:54 PM, denstar <valliants...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Stephen Moretti wrote: >> You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 I've >> done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only thing I >> thought about today (after a couple of months of using 3.4) was jQuery >> support in the javascript tools, but I can live with the "errors" because it >> doesn't understand jQuery javascript.
> You set up the built-in JSDT stuff? Comes with JEE, and It should do > auto-jQuery whatnots too, once you get the sources and whathaveyou > linked in there.
> It is a bitch, so I should blog it.
> Man... =]
> JSEdit is easier, but man, check out JSDT's options! Nice.
> :Den > -- > He who has not first laid his foundations may be able with great > ability to lay them afterwards, but they will be laid with trouble to > the architect and danger to the building. > Niccolo Machiavelli,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Stephen Moretti wrote: > You know since I installed and set up the JEE version of eclipse 3.4 I've > done away with Aptana and I don't miss it one little bit. Only thing I > thought about today (after a couple of months of using 3.4) was jQuery > support in the javascript tools, but I can live with the "errors" because it > doesn't understand jQuery javascript.
You set up the built-in JSDT stuff? Comes with JEE, and It should do auto-jQuery whatnots too, once you get the sources and whathaveyou linked in there.
It is a bitch, so I should blog it.
Man... =]
JSEdit is easier, but man, check out JSDT's options! Nice.
:Den -- He who has not first laid his foundations may be able with great ability to lay them afterwards, but they will be laid with trouble to the architect and danger to the building. Niccolo Machiavelli,
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Mike Henke wrote:
>> update: Michael Benner is correct, i don't have "content assist" with >> 1.3.2.beta, guess it is back to the stable CFEclipse version I can't >> live without like him :-)
> Weird. Works fine for me. 3.4-- well, pretty close to you, but with > UML and TPTP and whatnot... quickrex instead of regexutil...
> We can replicate a clean install during the build process by clearing > the runtime workspace metadata... if I take a stab at that "quick" > word wrap fix I'll see what happens when I turn that setting on. Or, > better, I'll make a new runtime just for testing that. Yup. That's > the ticket!
> -- > A prince should therefore have no other aim or thought, nor take up > any other thing for his study but war and it's organization and > discipline, for that is the only art that is necessary to one who > commands. > Niccolo Machiavelli
>Only thing I use Aptana for is the CSS editor. If I could find >something similar I'd dump it too. I've tried the WTP or whatever >it's called but the CSS edit in that didn't offer content assist like >Aptana.
I really find Aptana's JS editor heads and shoulders better than anything else out there. I use Aptana for any of my CSS and JS files. I had tried a number of JS editors in the past and really never found something I really liked until I found Aptana. I guess different strokes for different folks. :)
>>Only thing I use Aptana for is the CSS editor. If I could find >>something similar I'd dump it too. I've tried the WTP or whatever >>it's called but the CSS edit in that didn't offer content assist like >>Aptana.
> I really find Aptana's JS editor heads and shoulders better than anything > else out there. I use Aptana for any of my CSS and JS files. I had tried a > number of JS editors in the past and really never found something I really > liked until I found Aptana. I guess different strokes for different folks. > :)
I agree that Aptana's better than JSEclipse, but JSEclipse is still very very good. And JSEclipse doesn't try to take over my Eclipse install by putting a "message inbox" or "upgrade to pro" in my chrome.
Shame there's still no other decent CSS editor.
-- A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off."
>> I really find Aptana's JS editor heads and shoulders better than anything >> else out there. I use Aptana for any of my CSS and JS files. I had tried >a >> number of JS editors in the past and really never found something I >really >> liked until I found Aptana. I guess different strokes for different >folks. >> :)
>I agree that Aptana's better than JSEclipse, but JSEclipse is still >very very good. And JSEclipse doesn't try to take over my Eclipse >install by putting a "message inbox" or "upgrade to pro" in my chrome.
>Shame there's still no other decent CSS editor.
I barely notice those things in my chrome--and I'm willing to live with it since it's free.
I guess for me the benefits far out way any disadvantages.
|
