Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Erlang/OTP releases: rebar, release_handler, .appup, etc

Received: by 10.224.28.75 with SMTP id l11mr501165qac.17.1285379801589;
        Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: ceug@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.224.87.217 with SMTP id x25ls696923qal.0.p; Fri, 24 Sep 2010
 18:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.106.150 with SMTP id x22mr500737qao.20.1285379801183;
        Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.106.150 with SMTP id x22mr500736qao.20.1285379801130;
        Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <martinjlo...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qy0-f176.google.com (mail-qy0-f176.google.com [209.85.216.176])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x2si1636293qcq.3.2010.09.24.18.56.40;
        Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of martinjlo...@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.176;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of martinjlo...@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=martinjlo...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-qy0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 8so3023115qyk.7
        for <ceug@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=hIzc8rbNzwHttqTB1OXD2ttOUg22ursrlh0aXQ0nyDU=;
        b=QBr1fY4TR/eshd3/Y1FZYdbK7BiKKckwf18cXXqS3bjwnwLVQSFODYY28NpwhjJK4e
         7tOYtOdW8KtZOkfPo/psltUPh3+nP1VVtrzvN+CDZ+IoMowbw9iANV83CI3YUv7+NWVv
         /nnzGNDuuwv83aBdUEkpnuphEMLjjIsxVddg0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=ou4fhEbbo4hXTyDOOC8cD4wWA7j5DvF4YebJEslNS1XUDTkR/RRO12gOx4+1OysSPl
         qd4rr/7Ki4WekgSCOv/vY+Oo/YvJJHuv1YJxWVh37J3gQJ3IzuajJllrne9h+ixM7OTP
         SB6Msiq9+30RpQAwCYZDUVcn76OvQIzfPmfy4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.251.210 with SMTP id mt18mr3119743qcb.151.1285379799927;
 Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.240.213 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikThrnnVY6j8+D4f1sPyKKp8-osNTHSd29bG...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimVFLk-PTfQE7Nm2o_xofrzSPgow6FfigrRy...@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinBcseJF=i_3UQC-Ev4tOwNJvrt9pm=5TSLY...@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=y4B9YnarvPvYY39-3UKEQppkxgHfvnWFcu...@mail.gmail.com>
	<57F3C72C-67C7-4034-9060-64BD4CEB7...@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTin+omPNY1qiR+veqKbH_dBN1wMu6vEiRZm4R...@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=sS_0vL_MFjyn2m=pMuLvKz5__sMPmXuiY8...@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimtSpYbE1sVB1aWbLAzQEEbOeESE+H4_W43F...@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=Hz8LDPWoDmg9fO4b4aza_yrcr6AyX0RBqC...@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikThrnnVY6j8+D4f1sPyKKp8-osNTHSd29bG...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:56:39 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinyfeoN-XEUkXdUvbvzNYA+1zcZ7gEuzbC9P...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Chi Erlang Users] Erlang/OTP releases: rebar, release_handler,
 .appup, etc
From: Martin Logan <martinjlo...@gmail.com>
To: ceug@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163631036f60532b04910bcecb

--00163631036f60532b04910bcecb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Definitely - will see you at the workshop and we can talk. As for extensions
to OTP, better put, just advances in packaging - a tar ball is not always
sufficient from an operational perspective. I will catch you up on all our
goings on then.

Cheers,
Martin

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Dave Smith <diz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Martin Logan <martinjlo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, reltool is a mess. That is why we rolled our own. The second
> generation
> > of faxien will be much tighter than relltool. We have talked about this
> > before but never with any traction. Why not work together so the packages
> > you produce are installable with faxien and can be published to the
> repos.
> > Why don't we agree on a common format that is OTP complient and extended
> > where need be? I have never thought it benefits us to develop these
> separate
> > tools - are you open to that?
>
> So, I've not heard anything about the next gen of faxien...what's the
> status/goals?
>
> I'm all for ensuring our tools work together. I'm curious what
> extensions would need to be made to the OTP format? Or am I
> misunderstanding something?
>
> Sorry I didn't answer this sooner -- been meaning to all week. It's
> just been one of "those" weeks. :) I'll be at the Erlang Workshop next
> week; maybe we can sync up then?
>
> D.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Chicago Erlang User Group" group.
> To post to this group, send email to ceug@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> ceug+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com <ceug%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/ceug?hl=en.
>
>

--00163631036f60532b04910bcecb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Definitely - will see you at the workshop and we can talk. As for extension=
s to OTP, better put, just advances in packaging - a=A0tar ball=A0is not al=
ways sufficient from an operational perspective. I will catch you up on all=
 our goings on then.<div>
<br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Martin<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">O=
n Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Dave Smith <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D=
"mailto:diz...@gmail.com">diz...@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class=3D"im">On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Martin Logan &lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:martinjlo...@gmail.com">martinjlo...@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br=
>
&gt;<br>
</div><div class=3D"im">&gt; Yes, reltool is a mess. That is why we rolled =
our own. The second generation<br>
&gt; of faxien will be much tighter than relltool. We have talked about thi=
s<br>
&gt; before but never with any traction. Why not work together so the packa=
ges<br>
&gt; you produce are installable with faxien and can be published to the re=
pos.<br>
&gt; Why don&#39;t we agree on a common format that is OTP complient and ex=
tended<br>
&gt; where need be? I have never thought it benefits us to develop these se=
parate<br>
&gt; tools - are you open to that?<br>
<br>
</div>So, I&#39;ve not heard anything about the next gen of faxien...what&#=
39;s the<br>
status/goals?<br>
<br>
I&#39;m all for ensuring our tools work together. I&#39;m curious what<br>
extensions would need to be made to the OTP format? Or am I<br>
misunderstanding something?<br>
<br>
Sorry I didn&#39;t answer this sooner -- been meaning to all week. It&#39;s=
<br>
just been one of &quot;those&quot; weeks. :) I&#39;ll be at the Erlang Work=
shop next<br>
week; maybe we can sync up then?<br>
<br>
D.<br>
<font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5">You received this message because =
you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quot;Chicago Erlang User Group&quo=
t; group.<br>
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:c...@googlegroups.co=
m">ceug@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:ceug%2Bunsu=
bscribe@googlegroups.com">ceug+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br>
For more options, visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/g=
roup/ceug?hl=3Den" target=3D"_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/ceug?hl=
=3Den</a>.<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--00163631036f60532b04910bcecb--