From: Mike Pence <mike.pe...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:50:47 -0500
Local: Tues, Feb 7 2012 8:50 am
Subject: Re: Design discussion
Wouldn't distributing apotomo widgets in embedded engines make the most sense?
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Nick Sutterer <apoton...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Mike Pence <mike.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why not put the views where regular views go and put a widgets folder >> under controllers? > This would make it even more complicated to package and distribute a >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Nick Sutterer <apoton...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Nick Sutterer <apoton...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Please join the discussion ( it concerns to both Apotomo and Cells users): >>>> The discussion is about changing the Cells file layout from >>>> app/widgets/ >>>> to something like >>>> app/widgets/ >>>> Making the widgets assets "encapsulated". What do you guys think? >>>>> https://github.com/apotonick/apotomo/pull/65 >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||