Ranking system for services provided in Displacement sites

2 views

Skip to first unread message

Monique Beun

unread,

Sep 26, 2008, 6:17:28 AM9/26/08

to cccm...@googlegroups.com, ccc...@gmail.com, ashok.s...@adranepal.org, phillip...@concern.net, regine....@concern.net, mdmn...@yahoo.com, msfh-ne...@field.amsterdam.msf.org, msfh-nep...@field.amsterdam.msf.org, shod...@nfhp.org.np, ma...@nyof.org, Kimber...@wfp.org, bilan.o...@wfp.org, Grote...@searo.who.int, hom.ac...@gmail.com, Ram_ad...@wvi.org, Anup...@wvi.org, broe...@unfpa.org, gsh...@savechildren.org.np, lbh...@savechildren.org.np, pma...@savechildren.org.np, Pragya Mathema

Dear EHNWG Nutrition members and CCCM information manager

The Camp Coordination and Camp Management cluster has requested our input
for the monitoring of the displacement sites under their mandate -
collective centres, spontaneous settlements, formal camps. They have
requested for "ranking" of the indicators, whereby I propose to split the
nutrition indicator ranking depending on the type of supplementary feeding
provided.

Please find herewith my suggestion for the ranking - but please, members,
give your further feedback directly to the CCCM cluster, preferably today.

Supplementary Feeding (wet-feeding (tick) / dry rations (tick)),
0= no supplementary feeding (SF) programme at all
1= irregular dry rations of SF for HH, fuel not ensured,
2= regular dry rations of SF for HH, fuel ensured
3= regular dry rations of SF and fuel ensured, separate child meal cooking,
but no active feeding observed
4= regular dry rations of SF and fuel ensured, separate child meal cooking
and active feeding observed
5 = regular dry rations of SF and fuel ensured, separate child meal cooking
and active feeding observed, referral system for Severe Malnutrition in
place

Supplementary Feeding (wet-feeding)
0= no supplementary feeding programme at all
1= wet-rations but poor hygiene, poor targeting, inconsistent ration sizes,
and no feeding supervision or eating utensils
2= wet-rations with good hygiene, but poor targeting, inconsistent ration
sizes, and no feeding supervision or eating utensils
3= wet-rations with good hygiene, and consistent targeting/follow-up, but
inconsistent ration sizes, and no feeding supervision or eating utensils
4= wet-rations with good hygiene, and consistent targeting/follow-up,
adequate ration sizes, as well as feeding supervision or eating utensils
5= wet-rations with good hygiene, and consistent targeting/follow-up,
adequate ration sizes, as well as feeding supervision or eating utensils,
referral system for Severe Malnutrition in place

I have skipped the original idea of a nutrition indicator for nutritional
status, because this is too difficult to observe. Nutrition cluster will
put nutrition surveillance in place.

As mentioned before, as a reminder to all: from tomorrow the role of
Nutrition Cluster focal person will be temporarily taken by Pragya Mathema,
after which a permanent replacement will be assigned.

Kind Regards,
Monique Beun

Nutrition Consultant
Health and Nutrition Section
UNICEF Nepal
Tel: +977-1-5523200 Ext. 1122
Mobile: 9851029268

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages