Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Terminology: Thunking vs Quoting
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Scott Prouty  
View profile
 More options Apr 2 2007, 4:09 pm
From: "Scott Prouty" <scott.pro...@solimarsystems.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:09:23 -0700
Local: Mon, Apr 2 2007 4:09 pm
Subject: Terminology: Thunking vs Quoting
I saw the discussion at LtU (http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/
2166), but I am replying here since I do not have any PLT to share on
the issue.  But, just from an end user perspective, here are some
ideas for renaming "quote":

"const" - This will let users see either "constant" or "constantly"
however they prefer.

"constf" - For me, this is more connotative of what it does, i.e.
"constant function".

"fconv" - OK, the seemingly more accurate "function that returns a
constant value".

Anyway, I do agree that "thunk" just doesn't conjure up a good picture
of what the function does (at least to a non-langauge designer).

Thanks!
Scott Prouty


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google