Status of GIT migration

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Markus Zywitza

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 6:32:12 AM11/5/09
to castle-project-devel
Hi all

after I have been busy some time, I want to work on AR again. However,
I'm unsure whether to use SVN or GIT for working on the trunk. I've
found some GIT repos on github.com/mausch, but all of them are marked
as
SVN migration - do not fork!

OTOH, the TeamCity is still pointing to the SVN repos. But when I
commit changes there, will this delay the migration?

BTW, my favourite would be GIT, as I have to work offline most of the
time. So is there a rough timeline for finishing the migration to GIT?

-Markus

Jonathon Rossi

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 6:49:59 AM11/5/09
to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
At the moment the subversion repository is the master, you'll need to commit to it at the moment.

AFAIK there was a big discussion about migrating but we never really decided without a doubt that we were going to migrate the projects.
--
Jono

Mauricio Scheffer

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 7:53:35 AM11/5/09
to Castle Project Development List
It was actually voted in favor of the migration, and I'm working on
it. There are a few issues that I will try to outline when I get some
time (currently swamped with work).

Markus, committing to svn will not delay the migration. I can send you
my git-svn clone if you want. Or if you're only going to work on AR
you can just:

git svn clone -s http://svn.castleproject.org:8080/svn/castle/ActiveRecord/

that won't take long since it's a short history.

Cheers,
Mauricio

On Nov 5, 8:49 am, Jonathon Rossi <j...@jonorossi.com> wrote:
> At the moment the subversion repository is the master, you'll need to commit
> to it at the moment.
>
> AFAIK there was a big discussion about migrating but we never really decided
> without a doubt that we were going to migrate the projects.
>

Markus Zywitza

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:13:14 PM11/5/09
to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
git svn is a PITA. I was dcommitting the master branch and it also
committed a feature branch and then forked my local repo.

I think I rather use SVN until the migration is finished....

-Markus

2009/11/5 Mauricio Scheffer <mauricio...@gmail.com>:

G. Richard Bellamy

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:18:03 PM11/5/09
to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
Yes, I didn't get a chance to pipe up before...

My recommendation, when using a SVN -> GIT structure, is to always commit to
SVN. Anything else is just asking for trouble. Once we've fully migrated, it
becomes moot, but until then...

- rb

Daniel Hölbling

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 7:02:14 PM11/27/09
to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
Is there anything new to report from the migration front?

greetings Daniel

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-d...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages