Thanks
--
Cheers,
hamilton verissimo
ham...@castlestronghold.com
http://www.castlestronghold.com/
:)
On 1/4/07, Roelof Blom <roelo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, please do because (quoting web site) '[...]will look similar to current
> MR scaffold with the difference that the code is live in you project so you
> can add a field, color [...]' is reason enough :-)
--
On 1/4/07, Ayende Rahien <aye...@ayende.com> wrote:
> You mean that I would be able to do right click Generate New Model, fill in
> the fields, and get everything?!
> That would be a real killer feature.
> Hell, just doing it from the cmd line is excellent.
+1
Though I do not use it since I am not using .vm, it is a major part of the Monorail business, being an important step towards real RAD
<br
On 1/5/07, Ken Egozi <ego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
I agree totally with Freyr - this would be a _super_ useful addition
to the project.
j.
On 1/10/07, Peter Berkenbosch <peter.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The migrator source is part of NProject and is available.
> I'm not sure where exactly because Marc-Andre has some server issues?
http://nproject.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nproject/Migrator/trunk/
The generator doesn't depends on any other project.
Most templates are made for MonoRail and ActiveRecord but their's no
direct dependencies.
Loosing my commit rights on the Generator (since it's in the main trunk
and I'm not a commiter) have made me think twice before giving one of
my project away. Altough I do not regret it, it's my way of saying
thanks for bringing joy and coolness to .NET developpement :)
On 1/10/07, macournoyer <macou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Moving what to contrib ?
>
> The generator doesn't depends on any other project.
> Most templates are made for MonoRail and ActiveRecord but their's no
> direct dependencies.
On 1/10/07, macournoyer <macou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
--
I was. It's your project so it's inclusion is entirely up to you.
Personally - I think it would make a really valuable addition to the
Castle Toolset.
> Loosing my commit rights on the Generator (since it's in the main trunk
> and I'm not a commiter) have made me think twice before giving one of
> my project away. Altough I do not regret it, it's my way of saying
> thanks for bringing joy and coolness to .NET developpement :)
From: http://wiki.castleproject.org/index.php/Contrib#Contribution.27s_future
" Contribution's future
If the contribution proves that it's valuable for our users, it might
graduate and go to the main source trunk. The decision is made by the
Castle PMC and under consent of the contribution author. It's likely
that in these cases the author be elected as a committer. "
In this thread - you voted +1000000 for moving the generator (gave
your consent). I'm sure that the PMC are or will be having a
discussion about making you a committer.
If you'd wanted to make that a pre-requisite then you only needed to
mention it and your code would not have been moved until this was
sorted out.
Complaining publicly about this is not the right way to get it sorted.
j.
I'm frustrated for not having enought time to work on this projet and
others and even becoming a commiter. I guess that's the shock of
finishing school and starting in the "real world".
script\generate whining --stupid --net-2.0