MonoRail release and dependencies
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Krzysztof Koźmic (2)
Dec 14, 2009, 6:18:52 AM12/14/09
to Castle Project Development List
Now that Binder and Validator are released we technically are free to
release Monorail. (based on
http://jonorossi.com/blog/images/jonorossi_com/blog/WindowsLiveWriter/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_11696/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_2.png
)
As I asked already and got no response, I would like to know from Ken
(but also Markus and Ayende) what are your plans with regards to
recent beta release of Dynamic Proxy.
What I think would be the most desirable development, is to release
2.0.1 (or 2.1.0) of Windsor and ActiveRecord depending on DynamicProxy
2.2 (which if no issues are found we can release by the end of the
year) and release MonoRail on top of these.
There are some significant changes in DP itself, plus both Windsor and
ActiveRecord have got a few fixes/new features, which I think would be
a good reason for a point-one release.
Krzysztof
release Monorail. (based on
http://jonorossi.com/blog/images/jonorossi_com/blog/WindowsLiveWriter/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_11696/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_2.png
)
As I asked already and got no response, I would like to know from Ken
(but also Markus and Ayende) what are your plans with regards to
recent beta release of Dynamic Proxy.
What I think would be the most desirable development, is to release
2.0.1 (or 2.1.0) of Windsor and ActiveRecord depending on DynamicProxy
2.2 (which if no issues are found we can release by the end of the
year) and release MonoRail on top of these.
There are some significant changes in DP itself, plus both Windsor and
ActiveRecord have got a few fixes/new features, which I think would be
a good reason for a point-one release.
Krzysztof
Ken Egozi
Dec 14, 2009, 7:07:17 AM12/14/09
to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
that would be the best thing, assuming:
1. DP+Windsor+ MR/windsor integration
2. AR+Nh-Bytecode-Procider
3. Tools.CodeGenerator + Email services + Binder + other dependencies, will all be ready soon-ish
I understood that some features and fixes on dp 2.2 and newer windsor are very important to people, so having these in within MR would be great.
I am however feature-freezing and dependency-freezing both at that, otherwise with the deep dependency graph of MR we would never be able to get it out of the door
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-d...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
--
Ken Egozi.
http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
http://www.delver.com
http://www.musicglue.com
http://www.castleproject.org
http://www.idcc.co.il - הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
Krzysztof Koźmic (2)
Dec 14, 2009, 7:16:03 AM12/14/09
to Castle Project Development List
DP is feature frozen.
We will either introduce no changes at all, or very minor bug fixes at
this point.
Windsor trunk uses DP 2.2 beta, and changes there are additive - there
should be no breaking changes from v2.0. There are some issues open
with patches but except for one which adds single new method to
IHandler, I don't think any other introduces breaking changes.
TTBOMK AR has had only bug fixes, and no breaking changes.
If you need help/have ideas for DP and Windsor integration let me
know, I'll be happy to assist you with that.
Krzysztof
On 14 Gru, 13:07, Ken Egozi <egoz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> that would be the best thing, assuming:
> 1. DP+Windsor+ MR/windsor integration
> 2. AR+Nh-Bytecode-Procider
> 3. Tools.CodeGenerator + Email services + Binder + other dependencies, will
> all be ready soon-ish
>
> I understood that some features and fixes on dp 2.2 and newer windsor are
> very important to people, so having these in within MR would be great.
> I am however feature-freezing and dependency-freezing both at that,
> otherwise with the deep dependency graph of MR we would never be able to get
> it out of the door
>
> 2009/12/14 Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <krzysz...@kozmic.pl>
> > .
We will either introduce no changes at all, or very minor bug fixes at
this point.
Windsor trunk uses DP 2.2 beta, and changes there are additive - there
should be no breaking changes from v2.0. There are some issues open
with patches but except for one which adds single new method to
IHandler, I don't think any other introduces breaking changes.
TTBOMK AR has had only bug fixes, and no breaking changes.
If you need help/have ideas for DP and Windsor integration let me
know, I'll be happy to assist you with that.
Krzysztof
On 14 Gru, 13:07, Ken Egozi <egoz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> that would be the best thing, assuming:
> 1. DP+Windsor+ MR/windsor integration
> 2. AR+Nh-Bytecode-Procider
> 3. Tools.CodeGenerator + Email services + Binder + other dependencies, will
> all be ready soon-ish
>
> I understood that some features and fixes on dp 2.2 and newer windsor are
> very important to people, so having these in within MR would be great.
> I am however feature-freezing and dependency-freezing both at that,
> otherwise with the deep dependency graph of MR we would never be able to get
> it out of the door
>
>
>
>
> > Now that Binder and Validator are released we technically are free to
> > release Monorail. (based on
>
> >http://jonorossi.com/blog/images/jonorossi_com/blog/WindowsLiveWriter...
>
>
> > Now that Binder and Validator are released we technically are free to
> > release Monorail. (based on
>
> > )
>
> > As I asked already and got no response, I would like to know from Ken
> > (but also Markus and Ayende) what are your plans with regards to
> > recent beta release of Dynamic Proxy.
>
> > What I think would be the most desirable development, is to release
> > 2.0.1 (or 2.1.0) of Windsor and ActiveRecord depending on DynamicProxy
> > 2.2 (which if no issues are found we can release by the end of the
> > year) and release MonoRail on top of these.
>
> > There are some significant changes in DP itself, plus both Windsor and
> > ActiveRecord have got a few fixes/new features, which I think would be
> > a good reason for a point-one release.
>
> > Krzysztof
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > castle-project-d...@googlegroups.com<castle-project-devel%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>
> > As I asked already and got no response, I would like to know from Ken
> > (but also Markus and Ayende) what are your plans with regards to
> > recent beta release of Dynamic Proxy.
>
> > What I think would be the most desirable development, is to release
> > 2.0.1 (or 2.1.0) of Windsor and ActiveRecord depending on DynamicProxy
> > 2.2 (which if no issues are found we can release by the end of the
> > year) and release MonoRail on top of these.
>
> > There are some significant changes in DP itself, plus both Windsor and
> > ActiveRecord have got a few fixes/new features, which I think would be
> > a good reason for a point-one release.
>
> > Krzysztof
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
> Ken Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.idcc.co.il- הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
John Simons
Dec 15, 2009, 5:35:56 PM12/15/09
to Castle Project Development List
Regarding point 3, as far as I know all monorail dependencies are now
release, are we missing any?
Regarding Tools.CodeGenerator, what is this? do we need it for this
release?
Cheers
John
On Dec 14, 11:07 pm, Ken Egozi <egoz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> that would be the best thing, assuming:
> 1. DP+Windsor+ MR/windsor integration
> 2. AR+Nh-Bytecode-Procider
> 3. Tools.CodeGenerator + Email services + Binder + other dependencies, will
> all be ready soon-ish
>
> I understood that some features and fixes on dp 2.2 and newer windsor are
> very important to people, so having these in within MR would be great.
> I am however feature-freezing and dependency-freezing both at that,
> otherwise with the deep dependency graph of MR we would never be able to get
> it out of the door
>
> 2009/12/14 Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <krzysz...@kozmic.pl>
> > .
release, are we missing any?
Regarding Tools.CodeGenerator, what is this? do we need it for this
release?
Cheers
John
On Dec 14, 11:07 pm, Ken Egozi <egoz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> that would be the best thing, assuming:
> 1. DP+Windsor+ MR/windsor integration
> 2. AR+Nh-Bytecode-Procider
> 3. Tools.CodeGenerator + Email services + Binder + other dependencies, will
> all be ready soon-ish
>
> I understood that some features and fixes on dp 2.2 and newer windsor are
> very important to people, so having these in within MR would be great.
> I am however feature-freezing and dependency-freezing both at that,
> otherwise with the deep dependency graph of MR we would never be able to get
> it out of the door
>
>
>
>
> > Now that Binder and Validator are released we technically are free to
> > release Monorail. (based on
>
> >http://jonorossi.com/blog/images/jonorossi_com/blog/WindowsLiveWriter...
>
>
> > Now that Binder and Validator are released we technically are free to
> > release Monorail. (based on
>
> > )
>
> > As I asked already and got no response, I would like to know from Ken
> > (but also Markus and Ayende) what are your plans with regards to
> > recent beta release of Dynamic Proxy.
>
> > What I think would be the most desirable development, is to release
> > 2.0.1 (or 2.1.0) of Windsor and ActiveRecord depending on DynamicProxy
> > 2.2 (which if no issues are found we can release by the end of the
> > year) and release MonoRail on top of these.
>
> > There are some significant changes in DP itself, plus both Windsor and
> > ActiveRecord have got a few fixes/new features, which I think would be
> > a good reason for a point-one release.
>
> > Krzysztof
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > castle-project-d...@googlegroups.com<castle-project-devel%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
>
> > As I asked already and got no response, I would like to know from Ken
> > (but also Markus and Ayende) what are your plans with regards to
> > recent beta release of Dynamic Proxy.
>
> > What I think would be the most desirable development, is to release
> > 2.0.1 (or 2.1.0) of Windsor and ActiveRecord depending on DynamicProxy
> > 2.2 (which if no issues are found we can release by the end of the
> > year) and release MonoRail on top of these.
>
> > There are some significant changes in DP itself, plus both Windsor and
> > ActiveRecord have got a few fixes/new features, which I think would be
> > a good reason for a point-one release.
>
> > Krzysztof
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Castle Project Development List" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
> Ken Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.idcc.co.il- הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
Ken Egozi
Dec 15, 2009, 10:09:12 PM12/15/09
to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
sorry, I meant the DictionaryAdapter
The CodeGenerator is an external tool from contrib (it generates a typed sitemap for controller actions, and for Routes, and also build typed nodes for Views per controller )
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-d...@googlegroups.com.
--
http://www.idcc.co.il - הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם
Ayende Rahien
Dec 16, 2009, 5:39:39 AM12/16/09
to castle-pro...@googlegroups.com
+1
2009/12/14 Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <krzy...@kozmic.pl>
Now that Binder and Validator are released we technically are free to
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages