I thought this one is worth sharing with everyone because it is quite
funny and also hopefully Hamilton reads this :)
Anyway, so I sent an email to MS for clarification on the license
compliance.
I sent the email to
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/default.mspx
Here is the email I composed:
"Hi there,
I would like to redistribute a compiled version of Yahoo! UI Library:
YUI Compressor for .Net (
http://yuicompressor.codeplex.com), that
according to the web site is licensed under MS-Pl (http://
yuicompressor.codeplex.com/license).
The project I work in is release under the terms of Apache Software
Foundation License 2.0. Please refer to Apache License for a friendly
description.
According to the MS-Pl license "If you distribute any portion of the
software in compiled or object code form, you may only do so under a
license that complies with this license." , the term complies is not
very clear!
Does ASL License complies with MS-Pl license?
Regards
John Simons"
And here is the reply I got today:
"Hello John,
Thank you for contacting the Shared Source Initiative.
Regarding your question about the license compliance, unfortunately,
we cannot provide legal advice. You should contact a lawyer if you
are not certain if a proposed business activity is legal or not.
Regards,
The Shared Source service team"
WTF?!?! So they can't tell me whether ASF license "complies" with
their own license! But my lawyer will!
John