I tried fine tuning after your suggestion. I modified following parameters:
SN.wirelessChannel.sigma = 0
SN.wirelessChannel.bidirectionalSigma = 0
SN.node[*].Communication.Radio.mode = "IDEAL"
SN.node[*].Communication.Radio.collisionModel = 0
SN.node[*].Communication.MAC.phyDataRate = 1000
#SN.node[*].communication.MAC.dutyCycle = 0.1
#SN.node[*].communication.MAC.listenInterval = 10
Most of the parameters does not made much difference. However, changing
collisionModel to "0" improved performance by 3% and further 6% improvement
observed when DataRate is increased to 1000(Initially it was default value
"250"). I changed duty cycle to 0.1 and listen-interval to 0.1 so that
radio does not go to sleep mode. But no performance improvement
observed. What I observe from following results of % data aquired and
energy consumed by all nodes is that nodes are not performing any activity
from 1.6S to 2S and 2.1 to 3S. I am concerned about this part. Can you tell
why such behavior is observed. Is it because nodes goes to sleep mode
during that interval?
Thank you in advance.
Time(S) (%Data)
(Energy Consumed)
Percent data received : 0.327557890974, 12, 0,
Percent data received : 0.427563889559, 12, 0,
Percent data received : 0.527569888144, 12, 0,
Percent data received : 0.627575886729, 12, 0,
Percent data received : 0.727581885314, 12, 0,
Percent data received : 0.827587883899, 12, 0,
Percent data received : 0.927593882484, 12, 0,
Percent data received : 1.027599881069, 12, 0.0490625,
Percent data received : 1.127605879654, 18.4, 0.0701775,
Percent data received : 1.227611878239, 24.64, 0.0756984,
Percent data received : 1.327617876824, 31.84, 0.080985,
Percent data received : 1.427623875409, 35.36, 0.0874717,
Percent data received : 1.527629873994, 38.88, 0.0967976,
Percent data received : 1.627635872579, 42.4, 0.105455,
Percent data received : 1.727641871164, 42.4, 0.105455,
Percent data received : 1.827647869749, 42.4, 0.105455,
Percent data received : 1.927653868334, 42.4, 0.105455,
Percent data received : 2.027659866919, 42.4, 0.121039,
Percent data received : 2.127665865504, 45.76, 0.140779,
Percent data received : 2.227671864089, 45.76, 0.141044,
Percent data received : 2.327677862674, 45.76, 0.141044,
Percent data received : 2.427683861259, 45.76, 0.141044,
Percent data received : 2.527689859844, 45.76, 0.141044,
Percent data received : 2.627695858429, 45.76, 0.141044,
Percent data received : 2.727701857014, 45.76, 0.141044,
Percent data received : 2.827707855599, 45.76, 0.141044,
Percent data received : 2.927713854184, 45.76, 0.141044,
Percent data received : 3.027719852769, 45.76, 0.176231,
Percent data received : 3.127725851354, 49.28, 0.208954,
Percent data received : 3.227731849939, 49.28, 0.209172,
Percent data received : 3.327737848524, 49.28, 0.209172,
Percent data received : 3.427743847109, 49.28, 0.209172,
Percent data received : 3.527749845694, 49.28, 0.209172,
Percent data received : 3.627755844279, 49.28, 0.209172,
Percent data received : 3.727761842864, 49.28, 0.209172,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Athanassios Boulis <
athanassios.bou
...@nicta.com.au> wrote:
> Consult the OMNET installation guide. Are you able to run the omnet
> examples?
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castalia Simulator" group.
> To post to this group, send email to castalia-simulator@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> castalia-simulator+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castalia-simulator?hl=en.
--
Regards,
Amit Gosavi