Globe and Mail trumpets Canada-EU trade deal

[st...@canadians.org]

You could see this a mile off, or at least since Saturday's skeptical op-ed from Gary Mason in the Globe. The ed. board had to have a last word in support of CETA when they've been silent after previous rounds. What bugs me is the Globe's assumption it's impossible to know any details (because the government isn't providing them). So they ask someone at Queen's. University to guess why IP wasn't mentioned in Trade Minister Ed Fast's statement. Had they spoken to anyone following the negotiations, for example the generic sector, or asked to speak with the negotiators themselves, they might know better.

------------

The shift in Canada's favour

The Globe and Mail
Mon Jul 18 2011
Page: A12
Section: Editorial

The eighth round of the free trade negotiations between Canada and the European Union has been completed, and the apparent progress toward the deepening of commercial relations between a huge community of 27 nation-states and another country with 10 provinces that all have a significant degree of autonomy is a remarkable accomplishment.

For the EU, this is the first time that it has attempted such a trade agreement with a developed country. For Canada, this is the first time that the provinces have been directly involved, rather than only being kept informed.

Robert Wolfe, a political scientist at Queen's University, points out that Ed Fast, the Minister of International Trade, was silent about intellectual property and agriculture in his statement about the negotiations on Friday, which suggests that these topics could yet be sticking points.

On the other hand, Lawrence Herman, an international trade lawyer at Cassels Brock LLP, plausibly conjectures that trade politics have "shifted in Canada's favour," because of a comparatively strong recovery from the recession and a rise in international respect for Canadian economic institutions. "Europe is in the doldrums and needs some good economic news," Mr. Herman says. "A trade deal with Canada would help."

If a good agreement is reached on government purchasing, that will be a real victory for free trade. Canada has recently suffered from procurement protectionism by U.S. states and municipalities, and Canada's provinces sometimes display similar propensities - most conspicuously, the preference for local content in Ontario's green energy policy, now the subject of a World Trade Organization complaint by Japan.

Consequently, the provinces' seeming co-operation on procurement in the EU negotiations is evidence of a welcome ability to overcome their own mercantilism - and welcome firmness on the European side of the table.

The EU's population of 500 million, compared with Canada's 34 million, makes one wonder whether this unwieldy, lopsided task is worth it for the Europeans. But if the negotiations succeed, it will not only be mutually beneficial but also a precious precedent for trade treaties among the advanced economies on a still larger scale.

[mbarl...@rogers.com]

There has never been a free trade agreement the Globe didn't love. We should not let them get away with this! We should all sign a collective letter of concern to John Stackhouse about the lack of balance in their reporting on CETA.

Maude

Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Canada-EU CETA" group.
To post to this group, send email to canada-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to canada-eu-cet...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/canada-eu-ceta?hl=en.

[Janet Szliske]

I think we should ask for equal time and try to get an op ed piece in.
Take care,
J

Janet Szliske
CUPE Communications Representative
613.237.1590 x267
jszl...@telus.net
jszl...@cupe.ca