=> Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter <= more American Gun MADNESS !!
Reality_CheckŠ
UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
CHICAGO (WBBM/AP) -- An 8-year-old girl was shot and killed, her
12-year-old brother was critically injured and their father, a Chicago
Police officer, suffered a self-inflicted gunshot wound during barricade
situation on the Southwest Side Monday.
Chicago Police said the shootings stemmed from a domestic dispute between
the officer and his wife, but they would not elaborate. They would not
release the name of the officer, saying only that he was 31 years old and
had been with the department about four years.
Department spokeswoman Monique Bond said police responded to a ``shots
fired'' call at the officer's home in the Brighton Park neighborhood on the
city's southwest side at about 10:45 a.m.
When officers arrived, a woman outside told them that there were children in
the one-story brick house and that she'd heard shots.
``You could hear moans from within the residence,'' said First Deputy
Superintendent James Jackson.
SWAT officers rushed in the house, finding the dead officer and the two
children, who police say were an 8-year-old girl and a 12-year-old boy, in
separate areas of the home. Bond said it appeared that all had been shot
with the same handgun. The Cook County Medical Examiner's office said the
girl, which they said was 7 years old, was pronounced dead at 11:52 a.m.
The children were taken to Mount Sinai Hospital, where the boy remained in
critical condition Monday afternoon.
Police said the officer who took his own life lived at the house, but they
did not know if the two children lived there, as well. Officials with the
city's Independent Police Review Authority, which investigates all police
shootings, also were on scene.
Jonathan Arenas, 26, who lives two blocks away, said he was walking by the
residence when he saw SWAT officers rush into the building. He said he also
saw blood on the two children as paramedics brought them out on stretchers.
``All the cops were running back and forth,'' Arenas said. ``That's when
they took the two children.''
Al Patrick
news tonight at 10 or 11. One source said ages 7 & 9, not 8 & 12.
Sounds from one source like the cops threw in a smoke bomb or something before charging
the place....probably to disorient anyone still alive with ill intentions.
Some divorces can get messy! Seems this one did! Don't know the who, what, why, when or
where of this one, but expect someone may be left with a guilt trip...Or perhaps this was
the intent of the deceased.
===========
R. LaCasse
wrote:
This trip, whether real or not or smudged, is just an everyday
occurrence in the world of guns.
Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them in the
garage or a natural gas stove......
If that don't work, puncture a fridge "vein", and
Freon-12/chlorinate them.....but the cop had a gun and new how to use it to
the best of his abilities...
What a psychopathic asshole, is that what they teach cops these
days, to take senselessly take other peoples lives in lieu of their own and
leave it at that...............they have no respect for anybody's life, and
the alternative to Death Row is suicide......
Big Cop shooting little disarmed kids.......
R. LaCasse
wrote:
|>The filthy murderous pig ...
Al Patrick
>
> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them in the
> garage or a natural gas stove......
Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the murder of her newborn baby.
The article follows but does not mention how she killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed
the baby in the neck with an icepick -- less than two hours old!
The article follows now:
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: September 12, 2008
CHARLOTTE
A 22-year-old Charlotte woman has been sentenced to more than seven years in prison in the
death of her newborn baby girl last year.
The Charlotte Observer reported that Esther Flores was sentenced yesterday to at least
seven years, 10 months in prison after pleading guilty to second-degree murder.
Mecklenburg Assistant District Attorney Clayton Jones says the baby died from a puncture
wound to the neck. Jones says the baby died within an hour of being born in May 2007.
Authorities say paramedics had taken Flores to the hospital after being called to help a
woman who was bleeding. Officials say neither the caller nor the woman said anything about
a birth.
Paramedics and police who returned to the home found the baby in two white plastic grocery
bags in a bathroom.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> R. LaCasse wrote:
>
>>
>> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
>> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them in
>> the garage or a natural gas stove......
>
> Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the murder
> of her newborn baby. The article follows but does not mention how she
> killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed the baby in the neck with an
> icepick -- less than two hours old!
If only the newborn had a CCW it could have defended itself from
that murderous mommy ...
Scout
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
news:6jabhjF...@mid.individual.net...
> Al Patrick wrote:
>> R. LaCasse wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
>>> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them in
>>> the garage or a natural gas stove......
>>
>> Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the murder
>> of her newborn baby. The article follows but does not mention how she
>> killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed the baby in the neck with an
>> icepick -- less than two hours old!
>
> If only the newborn had a CCW it could have defended itself from
> that murderous mommy ...
If only you had a brain.....
_ Prof. Jonez _
>>> R. LaCasse wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
>>>> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them in
>>>> the garage or a natural gas stove......
>>>
>>> Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the murder
>>> of her newborn baby. The article follows but does not mention how
>>> she killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed the baby in the neck
>>> with an icepick -- less than two hours old!
>>
>> If only the newborn had a CCW it could have defended itself from
>> that murderous mommy ...
>
> If only you had a brain.....
This from the amoral shitwipe who claims it's ok to drop NUCLEAR
WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION upon Civilian Population centers
killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in the process.
Go fuck yourself, scumbag ... and fuck what you stand for.
Scout
Welcome to war.
Of course, Japan could have avoided all this by simply NOT STARTING THE WAR
IN THE FIRST PLACE.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>> Scout wrote:
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>> Al Patrick wrote:
>>>>> R. LaCasse wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
>>>>>> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them
>>>>>> in the garage or a natural gas stove......
>>>>>
>>>>> Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the
>>>>> murder of her newborn baby. The article follows but does not
>>>>> mention how she killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed the baby
>>>>> in the neck with an icepick -- less than two hours old!
>>>>
>>>> If only the newborn had a CCW it could have defended itself from
>>>> that murderous mommy ...
>>>
>>> If only you had a brain.....
>>
>> This from the amoral shitwipe who claims it's ok to drop NUCLEAR
>> WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION upon Civilian Population centers
>> killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in the process.
>
> Welcome to war.
Welcome to War Crimes Tribunals, scumbag.
Scout
Sorry, exactly what War Crime would result from the bombing of a valid
military target in a state of war?
Please be specific and exact, and remember that the specific instance we are
discussing is the bombing of Japan in WWII.
_ Prof. Jonez _
100,000+ civilians aren't "valid targets" under any stardard of civilization
nor under any treaty or convention held by civilized societies.
Now go fuck yourself you lowlife piece of shit, and fuck what you stand
for.
Scout
Fine, show me.
Then explain why NO ONE has ever been brought before a war crimes court for
bombing enemy cities.
Simply repeating your assertion isn't going to make you right, or prove your
claim.
Get a life
"Scout" <4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:AZ6dnVsilsl6u03V...@earthlink.com...
Jim
R. LaCasse
|>R. LaCasse wrote:
|>
|>>
|>> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
|>> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them in the
|>> garage or a natural gas stove......
|>
|>Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the murder of her newborn baby.
|>The article follows but does not mention how she killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed
|>the baby in the neck with an icepick -- less than two hours old!
I hope she regrets it all her life........
speaking of ice picks, a saw a video of a mild Hispanic guy who
stabbed himself in the left ear with a long ice pick, he looked like that
"Lt. Uhura/Star trek" with the just the handle sticking out.
Through a 1 in a billion chance, nothing was damaged, and the worse
damage was done when they tried to surgically remove it, with live CAT scans
on, the handle broke off once, but the vice grips worked it put...
The mild Hispanic guy, wanted to kill the "Demonos" in is head and
said it was OK to release them in a Hospital.....talk about hospitalizing
the Dream Police....since then, they probably came back probably charging
him with attempted murder or something.......
R. LaCasse
<4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
|>> This from the amoral shitwipe who claims it's ok to drop NUCLEAR
|>> WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION upon Civilian Population centers
|>> killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in the process.
|>
|>Welcome to war.
|>
|>Of course, Japan could have avoided all this by simply NOT STARTING THE WAR
|>IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Pearl Harbor was a planned war to get into the WW2 and the execution
of Dec. 7th 1941 was know to all high ranking officials, not necessarily
McArthur, but they squeezed the Japs to a Rebellious War by denying all oil
for their industries....without a real reason other than the reason they had
to do the WTC to get into the Iraq Oil war........Geneva Convention
Laws....you got's to have a viable reason....as a FIAT/Formality ...
But the that's the world of paper assed laws and wars...
R. LaCasse
<4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
|>> 100,000+ civilians aren't "valid targets" under any stardard of
|>> civilization
|>> nor under any treaty or convention held by civilized societies.
|>
|>Fine, show me.
It looks like were into dredging up the collateral damage of
genocidal idiots....a lot of stuff is smudged and FOIA is just a big lie or
black marker...
|>
|>Then explain why NO ONE has ever been brought before a war crimes court for
|>bombing enemy cities.
They have and it cost trillions, but nobody want's to know that
their hard earned tax dollar all went to that laundromat....
|>
|>Simply repeating your assertion isn't going to make you right, or prove your
|>claim.
True enuff.......
AZ Nomad
Can somebody translate this into english?
Product
wrote:
|>On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:06:37 -0700, R LaCasse <The_Smo...@MJ12.info> wrote:
|>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:23:30 -0400, "Scout"
|>><4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
|>
|>>|>> This from the amoral shitwipe who claims it's ok to drop NUCLEAR
|>>|>> WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION upon Civilian Population centers
|>>|>> killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in the process.
|>>|>
|>>|>Welcome to war.
|>>|>
|>>|>Of course, Japan could have avoided all this by simply NOT STARTING THE WAR
|>>|>IN THE FIRST PLACE.
|>
|>> Pearl Harbor was a planned war to get into the WW2 and the execution
Pearl Harbor was a planned EVENT<--correction!
|>>of Dec. 7th 1941 was know to all high ranking officials, not necessarily
|>>McArthur, but they squeezed the Japs to a Rebellious War by denying all oil
|>>for their industries....without a real reason other than the reason they had
|>>to do the WTC to get into the Iraq Oil war........Geneva Convention
Oh....same reason for world war entry events, Geneva rules..
|>>Laws....you got's to have a viable reason....as a FIAT/Formality ...
|>
|>> But the that's the world of paper assed laws and wars...
|>
|>Can somebody translate this into english?
The commission of blighters consider us to be nothing but wankers
and tossers, they obligate some sort of wot.....
Bloymey maite, this is just a medley of similar events to emphasize
the great need the Yookay has for us as mere subjects....
PLMerite
>
> 100,000+ civilians aren't "valid targets" under any stardard of
> civilization
> nor under any treaty or convention held by civilized societies.
They were when they were Nazis in Berlin.
Regards, PLMerite
--
"Comes a time in every man's life when he spits on his hands, hoists the
black flag, and commenses to cutting throats."
- H.L. Mencken
Scout
"AZ Nomad" <azno...@PremoveOBthisOX.COM> wrote in message
news:slrngd0gm9.1...@ip70-176-155-130.ph.ph.cox.net...
Conspiracy theory.
Scout
"Get a life" <j...@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
news:t1Wzk.70$Hw...@read1.cgocable.net...
I dump my killfile every now and again, give them a chance and then throw
them back in when they show they are still useless.
Bama Brian
> Al Patrick wrote:
>> R. LaCasse wrote:
>>
>>> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
>>> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them in
>>> the garage or a natural gas stove......
>> Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the murder
>> of her newborn baby. The article follows but does not mention how she
>> killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed the baby in the neck with an
>> icepick -- less than two hours old!
>
> If only the newborn had a CCW it could have defended itself from
> that murderous mommy ...
That's your, er, dead Strawman. You feed it.
Nut cases are out there. There's one woman who was just convicted of
cooking her two-month old in the microwave, after she and her boyfriend
had a big fight over who was the baby's father.
I guess she figured it was an easy way to dry out the diaper.
--
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana, 1863 - 1952
Cheers,
Bama Brian
Libertarian
Bama Brian
Those nukes worked. The war was over. You're arguing with results,
trying to justify yourself with 20/20 buttocks.
Bama Brian
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
> news:6jamb8F...@mid.individual.net...
>
>> 100,000+ civilians aren't "valid targets" under any stardard of
>> civilization
>> nor under any treaty or convention held by civilized societies.
>
>
> They were when they were Nazis in Berlin.
I hear Dresden made a delightful bonfire. ;p
Scout
"R. LaCasse" <Heisei_...@Bob.info> wrote in message
news:nef0d4hamnpn51icp...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:36:38 -0400, "Scout"
> <4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
> |>> 100,000+ civilians aren't "valid targets" under any stardard of
> |>> civilization
> |>> nor under any treaty or convention held by civilized societies.
> |>
> |>Fine, show me.
>
> It looks like were into dredging up the collateral damage of
> genocidal idiots....a lot of stuff is smudged and FOIA is just a big lie
> or
> black marker...
Not really, Jonez simply has the issue with the nuclear bombing of Japan in
WWII and wants to claim it was a war crime, and anyone that support(s) it is
a war criminal.
> |>
> |>Then explain why NO ONE has ever been brought before a war crimes court
> for
> |>bombing enemy cities.
>
> They have and it cost trillions, but nobody want's to know that
> their hard earned tax dollar all went to that laundromat....
You can provide cites for this?
RD (The Sandman)
news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com:
> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>
>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>
> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons! Come
> on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest memories were
> with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
Was it the words "big" and "throbbing" that got you to drooling?
--
Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)
http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman
"Be who you are and say what you feel...Because those that
matter...don't mind...And those that mind...don't matter."
_ Prof. Jonez _
> drooli...@live.com (Drooling Idiot) wrote in
> news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com:
>
>> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>
>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>
>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest memories
>> were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>
> Was it the words "big" and "throbbing" that got you to drooling?
They seem to have caught *your* attention, nutter.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>> Al Patrick wrote:
>>> R. LaCasse wrote:
>>>
>>>> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
>>>> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them in
>>>> the garage or a natural gas stove......
>>> Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the murder
>>> of her newborn baby. The article follows but does not mention how
>>> she killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed the baby in the neck
>>> with an icepick -- less than two hours old!
>>
>> If only the newborn had a CCW it could have defended itself from
>> that murderous mommy ...
>
> That's your, er, dead Strawman. You feed it.
>
> Nut cases are out there. There's one woman who was just convicted of
> cooking her
That's your Strawmarthastewart, you feed it.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>> Scout wrote:
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>> Al Patrick wrote:
>>>>> R. LaCasse wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
>>>>>> baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them
>>>>>> in the garage or a natural gas stove......
>>>>> Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the
>>>>> murder of her newborn baby. The article follows but does not
>>>>> mention how she killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed the baby
>>>>> in the neck with an icepick -- less than two hours old!
>>>> If only the newborn had a CCW it could have defended itself from
>>>> that murderous mommy ...
>>> If only you had a brain.....
>>
>> This from the amoral shitwipe who claims it's ok to drop NUCLEAR
>> WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION upon Civilian Population centers
>> killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in the process.
>
> Those nukes worked.
War Crimes DO work ... that's why civilized moral nations have opted to
not engage in them, and to prosecute them when they are committed by lowlife
amoral cowards.
_ Prof. Jonez _
It's been posted numerous time by numerous people in
the other lengthy thread about Hiroshima/Nagasaki, the one
you ran away from when you had no moral or ethical arguments
to support your murderous position.
Your continued denial and ignorance won't make your
repugnant position any more tenable.
_ Prof. Jonez _
>>> civilization
>>> nor under any treaty or convention held by civilized societies.
>>
>>
>> They were when they were Nazis in Berlin.
>
> I hear Dresden made a delightful bonfire. ;p
So did the Twin Towers ... LOL!
_ Prof. Jonez _
> "Get a life" <j...@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
> news:t1Wzk.70$Hw...@read1.cgocable.net...
>>
>> "Scout" <4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
>> news:AZ6dnVsilsl6u03V...@earthlink.com...
>>>
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
Run and hide again, lil' scout ...
R. LaCasse
<4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
|>>> But the that's the world of paper assed laws and wars...
|>>
|>> Can somebody translate this into english?
|>
|>Conspiracy theory.
Theory? Your joking right?? of course you are, you know darn well
it's all a reality.....you just don't want to be labeled a conspiracy kO0k
by the cover ups lurking all over from bell/south net. BATFE.
For the Japs, it was die of starvation, since negotiations did not
work, just like in Iraq, so they attacked in retaliation.
If you have a ready to go, and a strange home invader backs you into
a corner because you don't want to kill before reasoning, intimidating, and
do a lot of redundant costly court time,....... there is breaking point, and
you just cut loose like a full auto Glock 18 ....
R. LaCasse
<4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
|>
|>"R. LaCasse" <Heisei_...@Bob.info> wrote in message
|>news:nef0d4hamnpn51icp...@4ax.com...
|>> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:36:38 -0400, "Scout"
|>> <4g...@earthlink.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
|>>
|>> |>> 100,000+ civilians aren't "valid targets" under any stardard of
|>> |>> civilization
|>> |>> nor under any treaty or convention held by civilized societies.
|>> |>
|>> |>Fine, show me.
|>>
|>> It looks like were into dredging up the collateral damage of
|>> genocidal idiots....a lot of stuff is smudged and FOIA is just a big lie
|>> or
|>> black marker...
|>
|>Not really, Jonez simply has the issue with the nuclear bombing of Japan in
|>WWII and wants to claim it was a war crime, and anyone that support(s) it is
|>a war criminal.
|>
The Manhattan project, was just that, a project, ....Oppenheimer
needed live "lab rats" to see the real effect of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and
Enola Gay was a good vessel to prove it, just like Polaris subs.
|>
|>> |>
|>> |>Then explain why NO ONE has ever been brought before a war crimes court
|>> for
|>> |>bombing enemy cities.
|>>
|>> They have and it cost trillions, but nobody want's to know that
|>> their hard earned tax dollar all went to that laundromat....
|>
|>You can provide cites for this?
The USA rebuild all of Japan' Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the
thousands of surgical skin transplants with pensions for the collateral
damage victims.
The actual cost in cite would be fudged just like the Lunar Project
reports, and all lunar Rocket/landing project costs, and would only be
deciphered through the chain of Phoenix Projects since operation "Paperclip"
1944....
RM V2.0
"Drooling Idiot" <drooli...@live.com> wrote in message
news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>
>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>
> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons! Come on,
> I want to hear more stories about how your fondest memories were with your
> daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>
2. even if 2d didnt exist IT WAS A COP. Remember only they are safe enough
to handle firearms.
3. Yes you are an idiot.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> "Drooling Idiot" <drooli...@live.com> wrote in message
> news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
>> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>
>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>
>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons! Come on, I
>> want to hear more stories about how your fondest memories
>> were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>
> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
> 2. even if 2d didnt exist IT WAS A COP. Remember only they are safe
> enough to handle firearms.
Sieg Heil!
> 3. Yes you are an idiot.
Sez the gunloon.
Ivan Elias
> RM V2.0 wrote:
>
>>"Drooling Idiot" <drooli...@live.com> wrote in message
>>news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
>>
>>>"Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>>The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>>
>>>>UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>>
>>>It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons! Come on, I
>>>want to hear more stories about how your fondest memories
>>>were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>>
>>
>>1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>
>
> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
To kill you, during a justifiable homicide, when the likes of you
commits a crime.
That's not murder.
And nobody cares HOW you want to commit suicide, poofter.
RM V2.0
> RM V2.0 wrote:
>> "Drooling Idiot" <drooli...@live.com> wrote in message
>> news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
>>> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>>
>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>>
>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons! Come
>>> on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest memories
>>> were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>>
>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>
> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
Hunting, sports, self defense (which is not murder). The actual amendment
was put in place to protect the people from the government.
>
>
>> 2. even if 2d didnt exist IT WAS A COP. Remember only they are safe
>> enough to handle firearms.
>
> Sieg Heil!
Huh?
>
>> 3. Yes you are an idiot.
>
> Sez the gunloon.
Yep. Says the delusional gun grabber.
>
>
>
_ Prof. Jonez _
Your delusions are controlling you again, jackass.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
> news:6jffg2F...@mid.individual.net...
>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>> "Drooling Idiot" <drooli...@live.com> wrote in message
>>> news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
>>>> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>>>
>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>>>
>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
>>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
>>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>>>
>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>>
>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
> .
> Hunting,
Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
Bullshit.
> The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people from the
> government.
And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward?
.
r_c_...@hushmail.com
> >news:6jffg2F...@mid.individual.net...
> >> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>>news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
> >>>> "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote:
> >>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>
> >>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>
> >>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
> >>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
> >>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>
> >>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>
> >> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
> > .
> > Hunting,
>
> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
The 2nd Amendment specifically protects the people's individual right
to keep and bear arms, a right assumed to pre-exist the Constitution.
There is no right to murder, so the 2nd obviously doesn't protect what
doesn't exist.
>
> > sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>
> Bullshit.
>
Justifiable homicide is not murder. The most common reason for
justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
> > The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people from the
> > government.
>
> And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
> actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward?
>
> .- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>
>>>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>
>>>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
>>>>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
>>>>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>
>>>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>>
>>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
>>> .
>>> Hunting,
>>
>> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
>
> The 2nd Amendment specifically protects the people's individual right
> to keep and bear arms, a right assumed to pre-exist the Constitution.
>
> There is no right to murder, so the 2nd obviously doesn't protect what
> doesn't exist.
>
>>
>>> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>>
>> Bullshit.
>>
>
> Justifiable homicide is not murder.
"There is no right to murder"
> The most common reason for
> justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
Just because a loser like you claims it's "self-defense"
don't make it justifiable, asswipe.
r_c_...@hushmail.com
> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
> >>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <droolingid...@live.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>
> >>>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>
> >>>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
> >>>>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
> >>>>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>
> >>>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>
> >>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
> >>> .
> >>> Hunting,
>
> >> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
>
> > The 2nd Amendment specifically protects the people's individual right
> > to keep and bear arms, a right assumed to pre-exist the Constitution.
>
> > There is no right to murder, so the 2nd obviously doesn't protect what
> > doesn't exist.
>
> >>> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>
> >> Bullshit.
>
> > Justifiable homicide is not murder.
>
> "There is no right to murder"
That's right. Justifiable homicide is not murder; check out the legal
definition.
>
> > The most common reason for
> > justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
>
> Just because a loser like you claims it's "self-defense"
> don't make it justifiable, asswipe.
>
That's right. It must be deemed justifiable by the cops or court
system.
>
>
>
>
> >>> The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people from the
> >>> government.
>
> >> And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
> >> actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sep 18, 1:00 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <droolingid...@live.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>
>>>>>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>
>>>>>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
>>>>>>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
>>>>>>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>
>>>>>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>>
>>>>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
>>>>> .
>>>>> Hunting,
>>
>>>> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
>>
>>> The 2nd Amendment specifically protects the people's individual
>>> right to keep and bear arms, a right assumed to pre-exist the
>>> Constitution.
>>
>>> There is no right to murder, so the 2nd obviously doesn't protect
>>> what doesn't exist.
>>
>>>>> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>>
>>>> Bullshit.
>>
>>> Justifiable homicide is not murder.
>>
>> "There is no right to murder"
>
> That's right. Justifiable homicide is not murder; check out the legal
> definition.
So there is a right to homicide then, eh?
>
>>
>>> The most common reason for
>>> justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
>>
>> Just because a loser like you claims it's "self-defense"
>> don't make it justifiable, asswipe.
>>
>
> That's right. It must be deemed justifiable by the cops or court
> system.
By "the cops" ?
What fucked-up third-world shithole do you live in, eh ?
r_c_...@hushmail.com
> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 18, 1:00 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
> >>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <droolingid...@live.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>
> >>>>>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>
> >>>>>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
> >>>>>>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
> >>>>>>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>
> >>>>>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>
> >>>>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
> >>>>> .
> >>>>> Hunting,
>
> >>>> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
>
> >>> The 2nd Amendment specifically protects the people's individual
> >>> right to keep and bear arms, a right assumed to pre-exist the
> >>> Constitution.
>
> >>> There is no right to murder, so the 2nd obviously doesn't protect
> >>> what doesn't exist.
>
> >>>>> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>
> >>>> Bullshit.
>
> >>> Justifiable homicide is not murder.
>
> >> "There is no right to murder"
>
> > That's right. Justifiable homicide is not murder; check out the legal
> > definition.
>
> So there is a right to homicide then, eh?
Homicide is not necessarily murder, manslaughter, or a criminal
offense; these are legal definitions, just like justifiable (non-
criminal) homicide is a legal definition.
There is a right to self defense. If an incident of self-defense
results in homicide, and it is judged justifiable by the legal system,
then there is no murder.
>
>
>
> >>> The most common reason for
> >>> justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
>
> >> Just because a loser like you claims it's "self-defense"
> >> don't make it justifiable, asswipe.
>
> > That's right. It must be deemed justifiable by the cops or court
> > system.
>
> By "the cops" ?
>
> What fucked-up third-world shithole do you live in, eh ?
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>> The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people from
> >>>>> the government.
>
> >>>> And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
> >>>> actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward?- Hide quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Ivan Elias
No delusions.
That's the fact of law... something you know nothing about, poofter.
You step into my home, I have the right to place projectiles into your
little skull.
(I wouldn't even need a gun! I'd just push them in manualy with my fingers)
No jury would EVER convict me... as I would not be charged with a crime
in the first place.
Ivan Elias
> RM V2.0 wrote:
>
>>"_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>news:6jffg2F...@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>>RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Drooling Idiot" <drooli...@live.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
>>>>
>>>>>"Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>>>>
>>>>>It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
>>>>>Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
>>>>>memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>>>
>>>Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
>>
>>.
>>Hunting,
>
>
> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
>
>
>>sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>
>
> Bullshit.
Sports and self defence is murder?
POOFTER SPEWS!
_ Prof. Jonez _
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>> Ivan Elias wrote:
>>
>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <drooli...@live.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
>>>>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
>>>>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
>>>
>>> To kill you, during a justifiable homicide, when the likes of you
>>> commits a crime.
>>> That's not murder.
>>
>>
>> Your delusions are controlling you again, jackass.
>
> No delusions.
Denial. Another manifestation of your delusional psychopathy.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sep 18, 1:38 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sep 18, 1:00 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <droolingid...@live.com> wrote in message
No one claimed it was, numbnuts.
> these are legal definitions, just like justifiable (non-
> criminal) homicide is a legal definition.
So there is a right to homicide, eh?
>
> There is a right to self defense.
Where, exactly, is that "right" enumerated?
> If an incident of self-defense
> results in homicide, and it is judged justifiable by the legal system,
> then there is no murder.
There is no Orange Pekoe Tea either.
Ivan Elias
> "There is no right to murder"
Nobody said there was, poofter.
You asked about the purpouse of a pistola.
Why do you keep forgetting about what you originaly asked, then turn it
around to make a fool out of yourself?
And please, TRY not to confuse murder with justifiable homicide, ten
more times, OK?
When you get killed, it's not murder.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> _ Prof Poofter Jonez _ wrote:
>
>
>> "There is no right to murder"
>
> Nobody said there was, poofter.
It's someone else's quote, numbnuts.
Do try and keep up.
r_c_...@hushmail.com
> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 18, 1:38 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Sep 18, 1:00 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >>>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <droolingid...@live.com> wrote in message
Answered above.
>
>
> > There is a right to self defense.
>
> Where, exactly, is that "right" enumerated?
>
Rights do not have to be enumerated to exist. The powers granted to
the federal government are enumerated in the Constitution in order to
restrict it from needlessly infringing on the rights of the people.
> > If an incident of self-defense
> > results in homicide, and it is judged justifiable by the legal system,
> > then there is no murder.
>
> There is no Orange Pekoe Tea either.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>>>> The most common reason for
> >>>>> justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
>
> >>>> Just because a loser like you claims it's "self-defense"
> >>>> don't make it justifiable, asswipe.
>
> >>> That's right. It must be deemed justifiable by the cops or court
> >>> system.
>
> >> By "the cops" ?
>
> >> What fucked-up third-world shithole do you live in, eh ?
>
> >>>>>>> The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people from
> >>>>>>> the government.
>
> >>>>>> And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
> >>>>>> actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward- Hide quoted text -
Ivan Elias
Then step foot back into the USA, and commit a crime where I live.
I gave you my address a dozen times so far.
Do so, and I _will_ kill you.
I will not be charged with a crime.
NOW does your little POOFTER BRAIN know the diff between Murder and
Justifiable Homicide?
Hmmm... obviously not.
Ivan Elias
> Ivan Elias wrote:
>
>>_ Prof Poofter Jonez _ wrote:
>>>"There is no right to murder"
>>
>>Nobody said there was, poofter.
>
>
> It's someone else's quote, numbnuts.
]
But YOU are the one that keeps bring that up, while dodging the subject.
I agree with that quote, poofter.
YOU, however still can't figure out that there is a difference between
Murder, and homicide.
Why do you keep wanting to be seen as the poofter you truly are?
I want a firearm(a pistola as you call it) to kill you, when you commit
a crime in my home, or attempt to harm my family.
I(and my wife) have firearms, (a pistola as you call it),to KILL YOU,
when you make the attempt.
Again, there is NOTHING you can do about it!
If you try, you will be shot dead.
WE will not even be charged with a crime.
Your cranial parts will be cleaned off the walls, and you will be
forgotten... or remembered as the idiot you are when the police see all
the child porno you have on your lap top.
I will be reimbursed for clean up costs and ammo.
Reality_CheckŠ
You're lying again, you cowardly shiteater.
> Do so, and I _will_ kill you.
Prove it.
>
> I will not be charged with a crime.
So what's stopping you, besides delusion and cowardice, eh?
Reality_CheckŠ
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>
>> Ivan Elias wrote:
>>
>>> _ Prof Poofter Jonez _ wrote:
>
>>>> "There is no right to murder"
>>>
>>> Nobody said there was, poofter.
>>
>>
>> It's someone else's quote, numbnuts.
> ]
> But YOU are the one that keeps bring that up, while dodging the
> subject.
You're lying again, shitwipe.
R. LaCasse
wrote:
|>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
|>> .
|>> Hunting,
|>
|>Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
|>
It's about any reasonable use....
|>> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
|>
|>Bullshit.
|>
You ever seen Bullshit???
Who cares what the piece of paper says, (sports, self defense) are
viable uses if a gun/pistola/sportspistols....
*DGU* (self defense) is not allowed in a lot of countries with a
dictatorship, or police state, like hmmm south Africa, Mexico, well you know
the events there...
|>> The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people from the
|>> government.
|>
|>And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
|>actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward?
Nobody needs a Brigadier Dictator/Police State Tyrant/Hierophant or anything
that may be a party to Gulo power pigs....
Everyone shoots their own guns and some share with others at ranges
or hunting events...If you don't know your shit, you shouldn't dick with
it...
R. LaCasse
wrote:
|>>
|>> Justifiable homicide is not murder.
|>
|>"There is no right to murder"
|>
Murder is a variable premeditated act, whereas DGU is an instinctive
need to survive a premeditated assault.....of those who want to Murder
You....
|>
|>> The most common reason for
|>> justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
|>
|>Just because a loser like you claims it's "self-defense"
|>don't make it justifiable, asswipe.
|>
DGUs are pretty much cut and dry bold in your face just
that,....DGU...
R. LaCasse
|>> Bullshit.
|>
|>Sports and self defence is murder?
How is punching paper at a range an act of murder...are you all
there??
"Hunting" murder? well that's a ethically based religious question
as in are people really animals on a another transcendental plane...could be
it's almost moot these days...
Killing a bunch of rodent that are tearing up your corvette or SUV
electronic wiring is a definitely an act of self defense, not murder...
br...@pobox.com
Someplace other than the sewer you were whelped in limey cur.
RM V2.0
> RM V2.0 wrote:
>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>> news:6jffg2F...@mid.individual.net...
>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <drooli...@live.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:20080917103215.403$f...@newsreader.com...
>>>>> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>>>>
>>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
>>>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
>>>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>>>>
>>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>>>
>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
>> .
>> Hunting,
>
> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
Thats not what you asked. You asked the purpose of the pistola.
>
>> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>
> Bullshit.
Good answer, cant argue with that logic.
>
>> The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people from the
>> government.
>
> And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
> actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward?
>
Taking a life when necesssary hasnt fazed me in the past and wouldnt now.
>
> .
>
RM V2.0
>>> "There is no right to murder"
>>
>> That's right. Justifiable homicide is not murder; check out the legal
>> definition.
>
> So there is a right to homicide then, eh?
Now you get it! I guess you will be wanting to arrest all the LEO that have
killed someone.
>
Illinois Boy
> CHARLOTTE
> A 22-year-old Charlotte woman has been sentenced to more than seven
> years in prison in the death of her newborn baby girl last year.
> The Charlotte Observer reported that Esther Flores was sentenced
> yesterday to at least seven years, 10 months in prison after pleading
> guilty to second-degree murder.
> Mecklenburg Assistant District Attorney Clayton Jones says the baby died
> from a puncture wound to the neck. Jones says the baby died within an
> hour of being born in May 2007.
> Authorities say paramedics had taken Flores to the hospital after being
> called to help a woman who was bleeding. Officials say neither the
> caller nor the woman said anything about a birth.
> Paramedics and police who returned to the home found the baby in two
> white plastic grocery bags in a bathroom.
A big problem here is a woman can throw a newborn in the dumpster or
kill it and they send her to prison for murder but a filthy sub human
doctor can take a perfectly healthy baby that is born except for his
head, punch a hole in it's head and suck the brains out of it and he is
free to do it again and again. At least the dumpster baby has a chance.
Illinois Boy
> Scout wrote:
>
>>"_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>
>>>Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>>"_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>>Scout wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Al Patrick wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>R. LaCasse wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Without a gun, he could have done the usual Axe them to death,
>>>>>>>>>baseball batting, bludgeoning, or the human and clever gas them
>>>>>>>>>in the garage or a natural gas stove......
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Since you bring that up. A woman was just sentenced for the
>>>>>>>>murder of her newborn baby. The article follows but does not
>>>>>>>>mention how she killed it. Talk radio says she stabbed the baby
>>>>>>>>in the neck with an icepick -- less than two hours old!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If only the newborn had a CCW it could have defended itself from
>>>>>>>that murderous mommy ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If only you had a brain.....
>>>>>
>>>>>This from the amoral shitwipe who claims it's ok to drop NUCLEAR
>>>>>WEAPONS of MASS DESTRUCTION upon Civilian Population centers
>>>>>killing 100,000+ innocent men, women and children in the process.
>>>>
>>>>Welcome to war.
>>>
>>>Welcome to War Crimes Tribunals, scumbag.
>>
>>Sorry, exactly what War Crime would result from the bombing of a valid
>>military target in a state of war?
>
>
> 100,000+ civilians aren't "valid targets" under any stardard of civilization
> nor under any treaty or convention held by civilized societies.
>
> Now go fuck yourself you lowlife piece of shit, and fuck what you stand
> for.
>
I bet you think abortion is ok though, don't you.
_ Prof. Jonez _
Why wouldn't it be, eh nutter?
_ Prof. Jonez _
> Al Patrick wrote:
>
>> CHARLOTTE
>> A 22-year-old Charlotte woman has been sentenced to more than seven
>> years in prison in the death of her newborn baby girl last year.
>> The Charlotte Observer reported that Esther Flores was sentenced
>> yesterday to at least seven years, 10 months in prison after pleading
>> guilty to second-degree murder.
>> Mecklenburg Assistant District Attorney Clayton Jones says the baby
>> died from a puncture wound to the neck. Jones says the baby died
>> within an hour of being born in May 2007.
>> Authorities say paramedics had taken Flores to the hospital after
>> being called to help a woman who was bleeding. Officials say neither
>> the caller nor the woman said anything about a birth.
>> Paramedics and police who returned to the home found the baby in two
>> white plastic grocery bags in a bathroom.
>
> A big problem here is a woman can throw a newborn in the dumpster or
> kill it and they send her to prison for murder
Because killing infants is illegal, jackass.
> but a filthy sub human
> doctor can take a perfectly healthy baby that is born except for his
> head, punch a hole in it's head and suck the brains out of it and he
> is free to do it again and again.
More complete and utter BULLSHIT from the religious imbecile.
> At least the dumpster baby has a chance.
What chance is that? Prayer? LOL!
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Sep 18, 1:58 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sep 18, 1:38 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sep 18, 1:00 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
>>>>>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <droolingid...@live.com> wrote in message
And one of those rights according to you is the right to commit homicide, eh?
_ Prof. Jonez _
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:34:05 -0700, Dr. Jon-Pierre Pigglesworth
> <gree...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:41:40 GMT, ozark...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:30:32 -0700, Dr. Jon-Pierre Pigglesworth
>>> <gree...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:03:49 -0700 (PDT), "r_c_...@hushmail.com"
>>>> <r_c_...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 18, 2:33 pm, Dr. Jon-Pierre Pigglesworth
>>>>> <greet...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:54:39 -0700 (PDT),
>>>>>> "r_c_br...@hushmail.com"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <r_c_br...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Real...@Check.it> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daughter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gunloons! Come on, I want to hear more stories about how
>>>>>>>>>>>> your fondest memories were with your daddy and his big,
>>>>>>>>>>>> throbbing gun.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> Hunting,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The 2nd Amendment specifically protects the people's individual
>>>>>>> right to keep and bear arms, a right assumed to pre-exist the
>>>>>>> Constitution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no right to murder, so the 2nd obviously doesn't
>>>>>>> protect what doesn't exist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> from the government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> .- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> doesn't include any of the gun monkeys on here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Militia: a body of citizens enrolled for military service, and
>>>>>> called
>>>>>> out periodically for drill but serving full time only in
>>>>>> emergencies.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the
>>>>> people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
>>>>>
>>>>> This states that in order to preserve the security of a free
>>>>> State, a well regulated militia is required. In order to ensure
>>>>> that this militia can exist, the right of the people to keep and
>>>>> bear arms will not be infringed.
>>>>>
>>>>> The right is assumed to pre-exist the Constitution. It is being
>>>>> protected by the Constitution so that militia(s) can be called up
>>>>> as necessary from the pool of armed citizens. The citizens are
>>>>> armed because they have the right to be, as recognized by the
>>>>> Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> As the Supreme Court recently ruled, the 2nd protects an
>>>>> individual right, and noted that there is no requirement to be in
>>>>> a militia.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Word it how you like to suit your needs, but you are not part of a
>>>> 'well regulated militia". This refers to military which you are
>>>> not.
>>>
>>> Which is a moot point since the individual right protected by the 2A
>>> is not dependent on membership in a militia.
>>
>>
>> It's anything BUT a moot point. Better read it again.
>
> I have read it several times, pig. And it is a moot point.
>
> I have an individual right, protected by the 2A, to keep and bear
> arms. And I do not have to be a militia member.
Then try to exercise that "right" in an airport or gov't building, numbnuts.
_ Prof. Jonez _
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>
>> Ivan Elias wrote:
>>
>>> _ Prof Poofter Jonez _ wrote:
>
>>>> "There is no right to murder"
>>>
>>> Nobody said there was, poofter.
>>
>>
>> It's someone else's quote, numbnuts.
> ]
> But YOU are the one that keeps bring that up,
It's still someone else's quote, numbnuts.
_ Prof. Jonez _
You're are quite delusional, aren't you jackass?
>
> Do so, and I _will_ kill you.
No you won't, coward.
> I will not be charged with a crime.
Then what's stopping you, eh coward?
_ Prof. Jonez _
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons!
>>>>>> Come on, I want to hear more stories about how your fondest
>>>>>> memories were with your daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 1. 2d amendment conveys no right to commit suicide or murder
>>>>
>>>> Then what's the purpose of the pistola, eh?
>>> .
>>> Hunting,
>>
>> Geee, so the 2nd Amendment *is* about duck hunting, eh?
>
> Thats not what you asked. You asked the purpose of the pistola.
>>
>>> sports, self defense (which is not murder).
>>
>> Bullshit.
>
> Good answer, cant argue with that logic.
>
>>
>>> The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people from the
>>> government.
>>
>> And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
>> actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward?
>>
>
> Taking a life when necesssary hasnt fazed me in the past and wouldnt
> now.
LOL! ... anyone can play tough-guy on usenet, even a coward like you.
_ Prof. Jonez _
So is there a right to kill a LEO ?
Ivan Elias
> Ivan Elias wrote:
>
>>_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ivan Elias wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>_ Prof Poofter Jonez _ wrote:
>>
>>>>>"There is no right to murder"
>>>>
>>>>Nobody said there was, poofter.
>>>It's someone else's quote, numbnuts.
Then why do you keep quoting it?
> It's still someone else's quote, numbnuts.
And again, poofter, YOU are the one that keeps bringing it up, and
thinks that "right" exists.
Stay in Canada, or you WILL be justifiably killed.
Ivan Elias
yer cluckin' lie the chicken you are...again!
> No you won't, coward.
Yes, I will!
>> I will not be charged with a crime.
> Then what's stopping you, eh coward?
Waiting for YOU, poofter!
Can't you read and follow the order of how things work?
Step foot on my property, like I said, and I will kill you.
I will not be charged with any crime.
The only way that YOU can prove me wrong, is for you to show up.
What is stopping YOU, poofter?
See how it works?
YOU have to show up on MY property.
If you do show up, I will kill you with just one hand
I will punch you in the head so hard that it will make such a loud
"POPPING" noise when it flies out yer ass, so as to be heard back in Canada!
Waiting for you, poofter!
Ivan Elias
Of course there is, Poofter.
But again, TRY to realize that it's LEGAL to murder, or kill a LEO, even
in self defence, when in the commision of a crime that you started!
Poofter?
Try to stop being retarded for a split second, OK?
Reality_CheckŠ
Stammer much, eh retard?
Reality_CheckŠ
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>> Ivan Elias wrote:
>>
>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ivan Elias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> _ Prof Poofter Jonez _ wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> "There is no right to murder"
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody said there was, poofter.
>
>>>> It's someone else's quote, numbnuts.
>
> Then why do you keep quoting it?
That's why they call it a "quote", numbnuts.
>
>> It's still someone else's quote, numbnuts.
>
> And again, poofter, YOU are the one that keeps bringing it up, and
> thinks that "right" exists.
English ain't your first language, is it moron?
So is there a "right" to homicide like the other poster suggests?
Ivan Elias
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>
>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>
>>>>>> "There is no right to murder"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's right. Justifiable homicide is not murder; check out the
>>>>> legal definition.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So there is a right to homicide then, eh?
>>>
>>>
>>> Now you get it! I guess you will be wanting to arrest all the LEO
>>> that have killed someone.
>>
>>
>>
>> So is there a right to kill a LEO ?
>
>
> Of course there is, Poofter.
>
^^^
"NOT!"
I forgot that rather important word.. 1K pardons!
Ivan Elias
> Ivan Elias wrote:
>
>>_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>
>>>Ivan Elias wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Ivan Elias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>_ Prof Poofter Jonez _ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>"There is no right to murder"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nobody said there was, poofter.
>>
>>>>>It's someone else's quote, numbnuts.
>>
>>Then why do you keep quoting it?
>
>
> That's why they call it a "quote", numbnuts.
>
>
>>>It's still someone else's quote, numbnuts.
>>
>>And again, poofter, YOU are the one that keeps bringing it up, and
>>thinks that "right" exists.
>
>
> English ain't your first language, is it moron?
If I make a typo, I will be the first to admit it.
Your point?
> So is there a "right" to homicide like the other poster suggests?
Of course there is a right to "Justifiable homicide", you jackass.
Pay attention!
NEVER, is there a right to Murder.
When will you understand the difference between the two?
Bill Smith
wrote:
>"Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote:
>> The filthy murderous pig ...
>>
>> UPDATE: Chicago Cop Shoots His 2 Kids; Kills Himself, Daughter
>
>It is his 2nd Amendment Right! Tell us more about it, Gunloons! Come on,
>I want to hear more stories about how your fondest memories were with your
>daddy and his big, throbbing gun.
What would you suggest as a way to stop this sort of thing?
Bill Smith
Reality_CheckŠ
> Ivan Elias wrote:
>> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>
>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> "There is no right to murder"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's right. Justifiable homicide is not murder; check out the
>>>>>> legal definition.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So there is a right to homicide then, eh?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now you get it! I guess you will be wanting to arrest all the LEO
>>>> that have killed someone.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So is there a right to kill a LEO ?
>>
>>
>> Of course there is, Poofter.
>>
>> But again, TRY to realize that it's NOT LEGAL to murder, or kill a
>> LEO, even
> ^^^
>
>
> "NOT!"
> I forgot that rather important word.. 1K pardons!
Because you're a stammering imbecile.
Reality_CheckŠ
"But again, TRY to realize that it's LEGAL to murder, or kill a LEO.."
-- Ivan Elias
Reality_CheckŠ
"But again, TRY to realize that it's LEGAL to murder, or kill a LEO"
-- Ivan Elias
br...@pobox.com
What would a whining limey serf know about US law? This limey faggot
is so stupid that he doesn't even realise that he's a subject and not
a citizen -- that he's a serf rather than a free man.
Illinois Boy
Boy, you really are an Ignorant fool. I guess abortion could be ok in
some cases such as your mother should have aborted you.
Illinois Boy
You're an ignorant fool.
R. LaCasse
|>> So there is a right to homicide then, eh?
|>
|>Now you get it! I guess you will be wanting to arrest all the LEO that have
|>killed someone.
Nope, there is a double standard with LEO homicides.....they are
above the law, as U might have noticed in their botched home invasion
attempts.
But then they give out traffic tickets to chugs/coconuts and I stay
alive another year.....
R. LaCasse
wrote:
|>> Now you get it! I guess you will be wanting to arrest all the LEO
|>> that have killed someone.
|>
|>So is there a right to kill a LEO ?
Yep, but expect a lot of redundant "legal" proceedings and a good 10
years of being tailed......don't spit on the sidewalk, they'll be there
watching you for 10+ years with the Taxpayers fundings.
They take care of their own.....they provide some service, which is
then pumped through all the media to show they are good too.....nothing
more.
Of all the dashboard/etc. vidcams they have, why is it only 1% or so
is a good one to promote the LEOs....what is in the other 99%......
Their secret, our money...
r_c_...@hushmail.com
> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> > On Sep 18, 1:58 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Sep 18, 1:38 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >>>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> On Sep 18, 1:00 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> r_c_br...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sep 18, 12:33 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>> RM V2.0 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> "Drooling Idiot" <droolingid...@live.com> wrote in message
Already answered a number of times.
>
>
>
>
> >>> If an incident of self-defense
> >>> results in homicide, and it is judged justifiable by the legal
> >>> system, then there is no murder.
>
> >> There is no Orange Pekoe Tea either.
>
> >>>>>>> The most common reason for
> >>>>>>> justifiable homicide for individuals is self-defense.
>
> >>>>>> Just because a loser like you claims it's "self-defense"
> >>>>>> don't make it justifiable, asswipe.
>
> >>>>> That's right. It must be deemed justifiable by the cops or court
> >>>>> system.
>
> >>>> By "the cops" ?
>
> >>>> What fucked-up third-world shithole do you live in, eh ?
>
> >>>>>>>>> The actual amendment was put in place to protect the people
> >>>>>>>>> from the government.
>
> >>>>>>>> And how you going to do that if you ain't got the guts to
> >>>>>>>> actually fire your precious pistol, eh coward- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
R. LaCasse
wrote:
|>Nut cases are out there. There's one woman who was just convicted of
|>cooking her two-month old in the microwave, after she and her boyfriend
|>had a big fight over who was the baby's father.
|>
That's a slow death, even slower than any bullet...
|>I guess she figured it was an easy way to dry out the diaper.
That's what they (anti-gun-lobbyists) mean by guns kill people all
over, if it weren't for guns, there would not be any homicides and taxpaying
suicides.
The registry is opposed by a lot of Police and RCMPs, they say so
outright.......they all say we oppose the Registry, but could they really be
saying we oppose the Registry and "think" all guns should be confiscated
because under the Criminal Code 91+, guns are technically banned in Canada.
Oh you can read www.rkba.ca and say the opposite, but what we are
concerned with is a reality of paper charters and rights compared to the
justice of a bullet.
br...@pobox.com
wrote:
And what were you busted for?
Pedophelia?
RD (The Sandman)
@mid.individual.net:
Depends on the homicide. Some are justified.
--
Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)
http://home.comcast.net/~rdsandman
"Be who you are and say what you feel...Because those that
matter...don't mind...And those that mind...don't matter."
_ Prof. Jonez _
> "Reality_CheckŠ" <Rea...@Check.it> wrote
>> Ivan Elias wrote:
>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>>> Ivan Elias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ivan Elias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _ Prof Poofter Jonez _ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "There is no right to murder"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nobody said there was, poofter.
>>>
>>>>>> It's someone else's quote, numbnuts.
>>>
>>> Then why do you keep quoting it?
>>
>> That's why they call it a "quote", numbnuts.
>>
>>>
>>>> It's still someone else's quote, numbnuts.
>>>
>>> And again, poofter, YOU are the one that keeps bringing it up, and
>>> thinks that "right" exists.
>>
>> English ain't your first language, is it moron?
>>
>> So is there a "right" to homicide like the other poster suggests?
>
> Depends on the homicide. Some are justified.
So is there a "right" to homicide?
_ Prof. Jonez _
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>
>> RM V2.0 wrote:
>>
>>>>>> "There is no right to murder"
>>>>>
>>>>> That's right. Justifiable homicide is not murder; check out the
>>>>> legal definition.
>>>>
>>>> So there is a right to homicide then, eh?
>>>
>>> Now you get it! I guess you will be wanting to arrest all the LEO
>>> that have killed someone.
>>
>>
>> So is there a right to kill a LEO ?
>
Got it.
Ivan Elias
Of course!
But there is no right to commit murder.
Why do you continue to not know the diff?
Again, if YOU were to show up on my property, or in my home, I(or my
wife) will kill you.
No crime would have been committed on our part, therefore, JUSTIFABLE
HOMICIDE! :)
Killing your ilk and kind, is not considered Murder.
IF you had the balls to show up where I live, I will kill you.
And it will NEVER be concidered or seen as a murder.
PLEASE test my theory, and prove me wrong!
Ivan Elias
>>Of course there is.
> Got it.
About time!
Do YOU understand why... or when?
Rodney Long
> So is there a "right" to homicide?
Your mind can't comprehend anything but a yes or no answer
SO
Do you still molest little children ?
Answer it,, yes or no
--
SpecTastic Wiggle Rig,
Fishing lure remote control
See lure video you won't believe
http://ezknot.com
Wayne
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <the...@jonez.net> wrote in message
news:6jkpheF...@mid.individual.net...
homocide is successfully resolved in court using the "he needed killing"
defense.