Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
can.politics
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Arguments made for prison abolition
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
The Real Moose in Love  
View profile  
 More options May 21 2012, 2:40 pm
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, can.politics
Followup-To: alt.revisionism,
From: The Real Moose in Love <The-Real-Moose-in-L...@invalid.invalid>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:40:40 -0700
Local: Mon, May 21 2012 2:40 pm
Subject: Re: Arguments made for prison abolition
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
In article <m6gur.22406$TC4.5...@newsfe14.iad>, "_ G O D _" <DEMI...@SHAW.CA>
wrote:

> > yes, banishment so that they can never return to society.

> This should be determined according to the
> scale of tolerance of particular crime and an
> ability of offender to financial reimbursement.

> All and every crime should be penalized, but
> while tolerable crimes can draw banishment
> within the boundaries of the states of country,
> most heinous offenders ought to be expelled....

> > where and how do you expect to accomplish this magical feat?

> The criminal can elect a town or a country of
> his own choice (from offered areas) and pay
> his own fare.

I see, so the burglar could elect to live in Beverly Hills or next to his last
victim. Good idea. But please define "tolerable crimes"

> Otherwise, he would be hunted
> by his victim, within specified by court areas,
> similar to an ordinary animal-hunting season.

> The hunted are not allowed to use privileges
> of social support as well as police protection.

> Hunter could be legally hired if it's necessary....

the only thing wrong with this is that by adding either a raffle to select a
hunter or actually having an auction where you could raise inordinate amounts of
money to be used for the public good.

of course all you are really doing is promoting the same system by legitimizing
a small group of "Ubers" to determine who gets hunted. Or you don't address what
happens to the hunted who while escaping his hunters knows he cannot be further
punished so he goes on a rape/murder spree?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google