Dr. Tim Ball On the Significance of the CRU Hacked Documents

[socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights]

Dr. Tim Ball On the Significance of the CRU Hacked Documents

Corbett Report | Retired climatologist Dr. Tim Ball talks about the
significance of the recently leaked emails and documents from the Climate
Research Unit at East Anglia University.

November 23, 2009

Retired climatologist Dr. Tim Ball joins us to discuss the significance of
the recently leaked emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit at
East Anglia University which expose deceit, duplicity and collusion between
climate researchers to maintain the fraud of the manmade global warming
theory. These emails reveal stunning behind-the-scenes details about how
this fraud has been developed and perpetuated, and Dr. Ball shares his
insights on what they show.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydo2Mwnwpac

[socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights]

"gordo" <grme...@shaw.ca.remove> wrote in message
news:vdemg5tsbo2dbcug1...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:56:15 GMT, "socialist that fear the truth but
> want to give up all their rights"
> <.....Obama........the..saviour....@whitehouse,New.World.Order.UN.Global>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"gordo" <grme...@shaw.ca.remove> wrote in message
> >news:d96mg5h1rv98h4mf5...@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:43:34 GMT, "socialist that fear the truth but
> >> want to give up all their rights"
> >>
<.....Obama........the..saviour....@whitehouse,New.World.Order.UN.Global>

> >> Global warming is real.We have a few nutcases trying to sabatoge the
> >> meeting in Copenhagen.In 20 years we have seen the spread of mountain
> >> pine beetle from the US border through BC to Alaska.Yellow bellied
> >> marmots have spread into Alberta from Montana and now can be found
> >> north of Calgary.Humbolt squid are now appearing in BC waters while
> >> they used to be found only as far north as Mexico.The evidence is
> >> right here in our own backyard.
> >>
> >> Dr Ball is not who he says he is
> >> http://www.desmogblog.com/dr-tim-ball-the-lie-that-just-wont-die
> >>
> >> But Ball can't even tell the truth about his own resume. His claim to
> >> be the first Climatology Ph.D. in Canada is a total falsehood; his
> >> degree was in historical geography - not climatology - and it was
> >> nowhere near the first ever granted to someone writing vaguely in the
> >> field. It also was granted by the university as a doctor of
> >> philosophy, not the more prestigious "doctor of science" that Ball
> >> claims in these articles.
> >>
> >> Dr. Ball claims never to have been paid by oil and gas interests, but
> >> if you look here , you'll find a Globe and Mail story in which Dr.
> >> Barry Cooper, the man behind Ball's former industry front group, the
> >> Friends of Science , offers this clumsy admission: "[The money's] not
> >> exclusively from the oil and gas industry," says Prof. Cooper. "It's
> >> also from foundations and individuals. I can't tell you the names of
> >> those companies, or the foundations for that matter, or the
> >> individuals."
> >
> >Look if you hate this guy that fine, but the fact is "Global Warming" is,
> >and always was, a policy for genocidal reduction of the world's
population.
> >It's a fraud and people are being brainwashed on it, so gordo either put
up
> >or shut up about government propaganda being used on people like you, to
buy
> >all this global warming.
>
> I don't hate Dr. Ball.I just find it strange that he is a doctor of
> science when he is a doctor of philosophy and a shill at that.
>
>
> >
> >It has been proven that sciensts are making money off this stuff just as
Al
> >Gore the whore is.
> >Call For Independent Inquiry Into Climategate as Global Warming Fraud
> >Implodes
> >
> >Hacked emails discussed manipulating data to "hide the decline" in global
> >temperatures.
> >
> >Calls for an independent inquiry into what is being dubbed "Climategate"
are
> >growing as the foundation for man-made global warming implodes following
the
> >release of emails which prove researchers colluded to manipulate data in
> >order to "hide the decline" in global temperatures.
> >
> >Former British chancellor Lord Lawson was the latest to demand an
impartial
> >investigation be launched into the scandal, which arrives just weeks
before
> >the UN climate conference in Copenhagen. "They should set up a public
> >inquiry under someone who is totally respected and get to the truth," he
> >told the BBC Radio Four Today programme.
> >
> So why would you trust Lord Lawson?Do you trust the coal industry
> which he supported while in office to admit that they are contributing
> to global warming?I personally trust scientists far more than I do
> politicians.
>
>
>
>
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/globalwarming/6634282/Lord-Law
son-calls-for-public-inquiry-into-UEA-global-warming-data-manipulation.html
> >
> >The emails were leaked at the end of last week after hackers penetrated
the
> >servers of the Climatic Research Unit, which is based at the University
of
> >East Anglia, in eastern England. The CRU is described as one of the
leading
> >climate research bodies in the world.
> >
> >The hacked documents and communications reveal how top scientists
conspired
> >to falsify data in the face of declining global temperatures in order to
> >prop up the premise that man-made factors are driving climate change.
Others
> >illustrate how they embarked on a venomous and coordinated campaign to
> >ostracize climate skeptics and use their influence to keep dissenting
> >reports from appearing in peer-reviewed journals, as well as using
cronyism
>
> How do we know that any of the so called documents were not phony
> doctored or of any significance to science??? Your say so?
>
>
> >to avoid compliance with Freedom of Information Act requests.
> >
> >As expected, the establishment media has gone into whitewash overdrive,
> >characterizing the emails as evidence of "rancor" amongst the climate
> >community and focusing on some of the lesser emails while ignoring the
true
> >significance of what has been revealed.
> >
> >Organizations with close ties to the CRU have engaged in psychological
> >terrorism by fearmongering about the planet with doomsday scenarios,
> >illustrating their argument with outlandish propaganda animation videos
> >which show pets drowning and others that show computer-generated polar
bears
> >crashing to earth in a throwback to 9/11 victims jumping from the towers,
> >when in reality polar bear population figures are thriving.
> >
> Katrina was real the thousand year flood in England was real and a
> robin in the Arctic was real.The battle over the Article is real.
>
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDn5Xq-hVEo
> >
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxis7Y1ikIQ
> >
> >http://telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/03/09/wpolar09.xml
> >
> >"One of the emails under scrutiny, written by Phil Jones, the centre's
> >director, in 1999, reads: "I've just completed Mike's Nature [the science
> >journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20
> >years (ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the
> > decline," reports the London Telegraph.
> >
> >The author admitted to the Associated Press that the e mail was genuine.
> >
>
>http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ikaqlFpp9jCRHWN0zNuamKXfy
eMgD9C441LG0
> >
> >In another example, researchers discuss data that is "artificially
adjusted
> >to look closer to the real temperatures". Apparently, the "real
> > temperatures" are whatever global warming cheerleaders want them to be.
> >
> >As Anthony Watts writes, attempts to claim e mails are "out of context,"
as
> >the defense has been from CRU, cannot apply in this instance.
> >
>
>http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/22/cru-emails-may-be-open-to-interpretat
ion-but-commented-code-by-the-programmer-tells-the-real-story/
> >
> > You can claim an email you wrote years ago isn't accurate saying it was
> >"taken out of context", but a programmer making notes in the code does so
> >that he/she can document what the code is actually doing at that stage,
so
> >that anyone who looks at it later can figure out why this function
doesn't
> >plot past 1960. In this case, it is not allowing all of the temperature
data
> >to be plotted. Growing season data (summer months when the new tree rings
> >are formed) past 1960 is thrown out because "these will be artificially
> >adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures", which implies some
post
> >processing routine.
> >
> > Spin that, spin it to the moon if you want. I'll believe programmer
notes
> >over the word of somebody who stands to gain from suggesting there's
nothing
> >"untowards" about it.
> >
> > Either the data tells the story of nature or it does not. Data that has
> >been "artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures" is
> >false data, yielding a false result.
> >
> >Another email discusses changing temperature data to fix "blips" in
studies
> >so as to make them conform with expectations, which of course is the
> >cardinal sin of scientific research.
> >
> >"Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal
> >destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to
disclosure,
> >manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims
and
> >much more" was revealed in the 61 megabites of confidential files
released
> >on the Internet for anyone to read, writes Andrew Bolt.
> >
> >Another email appears to celebrate the death of climate change skeptic
John
> >L Daly, with the words, "In an odd way this is cheering news."
> >
> >In another communication, the author expresses his fantasy to "beat the
crap
> >out of" climate change skeptics.
> >
> >In another exchange, researchers appear to discuss ways to discredit
James
> >Saiers of the Geophysical Research Letters journal, by means of an
academic
> >witch hunt, because of his sympathies with climate change skeptics.
> >
> > "If you think that Saiers is in the greenhouse skeptics camp, then, if
we
> >can find documentary evidence of this, we could go through official AGU
> >channels to get him ousted."
> >
> >Other emails express doubt about whether the world is really heating up
and
> >infer that data needs to be reinterpreted.
> >
> > "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the
moment
> >and it is a travesty that we can't. The CERES data published in the
August
> >BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but
the
> >data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate."
> >
> >Scientists discuss trying to disguise historical data that contradicts
the
> >man-made climate change thesis, such as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP),
> >which must be 'contained' according to one email.
> >
> >Suppression of evidence is also discussed, with scientists resolving to
> >delete embarrassing emails.
> >
> >"And, perhaps most reprehensibly," writes James Delingpole, a long series
of
> >communications discussing how best to squeeze dissenting scientists out
of
> >the peer review process. How, in other words, to create a scientific
climate
> >in which anyone who disagrees with AGW can be written off as a crank,
whose
> >views do not have a scrap of authority."
> >
>
>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the
-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/
> >
>
>http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/
hadley_hacked/
> >
> > "This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not
publishing
> >in the "peer-reviewed literature". Obviously, they found a solution to
> >that-take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to
> >stop considering "Climate Research" as a legitimate peer-reviewed
journal.
> >Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research
community
> >to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also
need
> >to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who
> >currently sit on the editorial board.What do others think?"
> >
> > "I will be emailing the journal to tell them I'm having nothing more to
do
> >with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.""It results
> >from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for
this
> >is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by
Michaels
> >and Gray in the past. I've had words with Hans von Storch about this, but
> >got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice!"
> >
> >Scientists also "discussed ways of dodging Freedom of Information Act
> >requests to release temperature data," reports the Daily Mail.
> >
>
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230122/How-climate-change-scientis
ts-dodged-sceptics.html
> >
> >The emails show that scientists relied on cronyism and cosying up to FOIA
> >officials to prevent them from being forced to release data.
> >
> > "When the FOI requests began here, the FOI person said we had to abide
by
> >the requests,' the email says. "It took a couple of half-hour sessions to
> >convince them otherwise."
> >
> > "Once they became aware of the types of people we were dealing with,
> >everyone at UEA became very supportive. I've got to know the FOI person
> >quite well and the chief librarian - who deals with appeals."
> >
> >It is important to stress that this compendium merely scratches the
surface
> >of the monumental levels of fraud that have been exposed as a result of
the
> >hacked emails.
> >
> >People will look back on this moment as the beginning of the end for
global
> >warming alarmism and the agenda to implement draconian measures of
> >regulation and control along with the levy of a global carbon tax.
> >
> >Many more revelations will be forthcoming as a result of this leak, and
the
> >desperate effort on behalf of the establishment to whitewash the whole
issue
> >will only end up making the damage
> >
> \
> Are you really a coal shill ??

gordo, I know you seem to think global warming will save your sorry ass, but
you really need to wake up and get the donut from your ears

>

[socialist that fear the truth and want the new Holocaust for 9/11]

"Beal" <bealrabb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55d4ef84-8250-4d04...@f18g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

On Nov 23, 4:38 pm, gordo <grmerr...@shaw.ca.remove> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:43:34 GMT, "socialist that fear the truth but
> want to give up all their rights"
> <.....Obama........the..saviour....@whitehouse,New.World.Order.UN.Global>
> wrote:
>
>
>

> >Dr. Tim Ball On the Significance of the CRU Hacked Documents
>
> >Corbett Report | Retired climatologist Dr. Tim Ball talks about the
> >significance of the recently leaked emails and documents from theClimate
> >Research Unit at East Anglia University.
>
> >November 23, 2009
>
> >Retired climatologist Dr. Tim Ball joins us to discuss the significance
of

> >the recently leaked emails and documents from theClimateResearch Unit at

> >East Anglia University which expose deceit, duplicity and collusion
between

> >climateresearchers to maintain the fraud of the manmade global warming

> >theory. These emails reveal stunning behind-the-scenes details about how
> >this fraud has been developed and perpetuated, and Dr. Ball shares his
> >insights on what they show.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ydo2Mwnwpac
>

> Global warming is real.We have a few nutcases trying to sabatoge the
> meeting in Copenhagen.In 20 years we have seen the spread of mountain
> pine beetle from the US border through BC to Alaska.Yellow bellied
> marmots have spread into Alberta from Montana and now can be found
> north of Calgary.Humbolt squid are now appearing in BC waters while
> they used to be found only as far north as Mexico.The evidence is
> right here in our own backyard.
>
> Dr Ball is not who he says he

ishttp://www.desmogblog.com/dr-tim-ball-the-lie-that-just-wont-die

>
> But Ball can't even tell the truth about his own resume. His claim to
> be the first Climatology Ph.D. in Canada is a total falsehood; his
> degree was in historical geography - not climatology - and it was
> nowhere near the first ever granted to someone writing vaguely in the
> field.

>As I understand it, Tim Ball has a PhD in Climatology from the
>University of London. The "Swindle" clip on youtube simply swapped
>the school he taught at with the school that granted his PhD.

It doesn't matter what people want to say about the guy, the whole point is
global warming has been exposed as a fraud now and with all those E-mail's
now coming out, everyone can see for themselves that Al gore the Whore was
scamming people.