Terrorism by big pharma and government H1N1 Vaccine with Mercury and Squalene Pushed on Pregnant Women
The National Socialist Liberal Party of Canada - Neo-Nazi's may apply
blood money they make of innocent children
H1N1 Vaccine with Mercury and Squalene Pushed on Pregnant Women
It's getting crazy out there. New revelations about the novel H1N1 vaccine
are raising more questions than ever about its safety while there's a new
drive to push shots of the stuff as quickly as possible on perfectly healthy
pregnant women.
............
Monday, Sept 14th, 2009
It's getting crazy out there. New revelations about the novel H1N1 vaccine
are raising more questions than ever about its safety while there's a new
drive to push shots of the stuff as quickly as possible on perfectly healthy
pregnant women. That means the most vulnerable of all - unborn children -
will be exposed to a little-tested vaccine. According to a CDC authored
article just published in the British journal Lancet, "Once available,
vaccination will be an essential component of the public health response to
this influenza, and US guidelines place pregnant women in a high-priority
group for receipt of pandemic influenza vaccine."
Note the keys words in the statement: "once available". The words you might
expect, "once thoroughly tested for safety," are nowhere to be found.
According to an article just published in the Denver Post, Dr. Keiji Fukuda,
the World Health Organization's (WHO) own flu chief, has warned about the
potential dangers of untested vaccines (although he has stopped short of
criticizing Europe's full-steam-ahead approach of promoting H!NI
vaccinations).
To top it off, now comes word out of the FDA's Vaccine and Related Biologic
Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting held on July 23rd that the H1N1
vaccine is going to be laced with the mercury containing preservative
thimerosal. That's right, the same thimerosal that was banned in influenza
vaccines in California and several other states starting in 2004. The
reason? The mercury-laden toxin has been linked to a number of health
concerns - including worries thimerosal caused or contributed to the current
autism epidemic.
Is this an absolute scientific fact? No, the jury is still out on the
controversy but, bottom line, thimerosal contains mercury. Even more
importantly, the targeting of pregnant women seems unwise. In fact, the
Environmental Protection Agency EPA) web site states that "factors that
determine how severe the health effects are from mercury exposure include.
the age of the person exposed (the fetus is the most susceptible)."
Other worrisome tidbits of information about the vaccine have been revealed
in recent days. A Lancet editorial suggests that any U.S. plan to rely on
swine flu vaccines without ingredients to stretch the supply would reduce
the number of vaccination shots available other countries. The solution for
vaccine manufacturers, allowing them to stretch the vaccine to go further,
could be the addition of ingredients called adjuvants. According to breaking
news about the use of adjuvants in the H1N1 vaccine, Bloomberg is reporting
these compounds have never been approved for flu vaccines in the U.S. and
some studies have shown they cause immune disorders in mice. However, back
on July 7, in a not-widely-reported announcement, WHO recommended that
adjuvants be used to boost production quantity of vaccines available
world-wide.
The Age of Autism, a daily web newspaper covering the autism epidemic, has
raised some important points about these adjuvants. The web site points out
that the VRBPAC was not furnished with information on the safety of
adjuvants in the new flu vaccine. "Of concern is that the proposed adjuvants
(AS03 and MF59) are squalene (oil) based and studies suggest that exposure
to squalene is associated with production of auto-antibodies and auto-immune
disease," the web site states. What's more, some veterans have claimed that
squalene adjuvant in vaccines was responsible for Gulf War Syndrome.
According to the Lancet article, the reason the H1N1 vaccine is being pushed
on healthy pregnant women is because from April 15 to May 18, 2009, there
were 34 confirmed or probable (that means they were not actually
scientifically confirmed as H1N1 at all) cases of H1N1 flu in pregnant US
women reported to the CDC. Eleven of these (32 percent) were admitted to
hospitals. That hospital admission rate is more than four times higher than
for the general population.
But the authors of the article admit this high rate of hospitalization of
women with H1N1 could simply be the result of doctors being more likely to
admit a pregnant woman to the hospital than someone else in the general
population with the exact same symptoms. So there is no real evidence that
pregnant women are more hard-hit by the virus than anyone else. Yes, there
were six deaths in pregnant US women believed to have the H1N1 flu between
April 15 and June 16, 2009. All developed pneumonia and subsequent acute
respiratory distress syndrome. But where is the data showing whether they
were suffering from other illnesses? What was their nutritional and general
health status? Did they have other infections before coming down with the
flu? Was it really H1N1 that killed them?
Bottom line: there are more questions than answers about H1N1. Making
assumptions, including assuming that healthy pregnant women and their unborn
babies will have their health protected by being exposed to an untested
vaccine with unknown long term consequences, simply doesn't make sense. Yes,
the H1N1 virus may mutate into something extremely serious. But it is
important to remember that, right now, the flu it causes is relatively mild.