Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Hey WY, Cuntnadian Champion for Obamacare... 56 percent Want PRE-ObamaCare HC System Back
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Dhu on Gate
May 22, 2013, 11:26:50 PM5/22/13
to
On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:08:17 -0500, AlleyCat wrote:
> 56 percent want to go back to pre-ObamaCare system
>
> Majorities of American voters say their family will be worse off under
> the Affordable Care Act, and think it would be better to go back to the
> pre-ObamaCare health care system.
>
> na na na na, na na na na, hey ay ay ay... good bye
>
> Whether Congress can get it repealed or not... Americans will revolt.
>
> I wish they'd TAX revolt too.
FauxNoos does another "poll" of American illiterates...
Dhu
--
Ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco.
> 56 percent want to go back to pre-ObamaCare system
>
> Majorities of American voters say their family will be worse off under
> the Affordable Care Act, and think it would be better to go back to the
> pre-ObamaCare health care system.
>
> na na na na, na na na na, hey ay ay ay... good bye
>
> Whether Congress can get it repealed or not... Americans will revolt.
>
> I wish they'd TAX revolt too.
FauxNoos does another "poll" of American illiterates...
Dhu
--
Ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco.
opel
May 22, 2013, 11:44:32 PM5/22/13
to
On 5/22/2013 9:26 PM, Dhu on Gate wrote:
> FauxNoos does another "poll" of American
Wow, you canuckleheads just can't get your bitch and moan needs met up
> FauxNoos does another "poll" of American
north, eh?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Dhu on Gate
May 23, 2013, 12:36:22 AM5/23/13
to
On Wed, 22 May 2013 23:23:02 -0500, AlleyCat wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 03:26:50 GMT,Dhu on Gate says...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMCfMh9hEWA
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7x09O6Bt0eM
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3PJF0YE-x4
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xr201FqTP4w
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCXot2HQT00
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFeAFDh6dzk
>
> IQ tests performed in the United States have consistently demonstrated a
> significant degree of variation between different racial groups, with
> the average score of those with African ancestry lower than that of
> European ancestry.
>
> Intelligence exists and is accurately measurable across racial,
> language, and national boundaries.
>
> Intelligence is one of, if not the most, important factors correlated to
> economic, social, and overall success in the United States, and its
> importance is increasing.
>
> No one has so far been able to manipulate IQ to a significant degree
> through changes in environmental factors - except for child adoption and
> that they conclude is not large in the long term - and in light of these
> failures, such approaches are becoming less promising.
>
> The USA has been in denial of these facts. A better public understanding
> of the nature of intelligence and its social correlates is necessary to
> guide future policy decisions.
>
> Also stated is that the average IQ of African Americans is 85; Latinos
> 89; Whites 103; Asians 106.
>
> 89???? Wow! 85 for Blacks???? LOL
>
> Truth hurts, I know
>
> You LIKE voting along side borderline retards?
It was slavery did that.
They killed all the "uppities", that or ran 'em off to Canada.
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 03:26:50 GMT,Dhu on Gate says...
>
>> FauxNoos does another "poll" of American illiterates...
>
> "American Illiterates" that vote Democrat:
>> FauxNoos does another "poll" of American illiterates...
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMCfMh9hEWA
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7x09O6Bt0eM
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3PJF0YE-x4
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xr201FqTP4w
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCXot2HQT00
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFeAFDh6dzk
>
> IQ tests performed in the United States have consistently demonstrated a
> significant degree of variation between different racial groups, with
> the average score of those with African ancestry lower than that of
> European ancestry.
>
> Intelligence exists and is accurately measurable across racial,
> language, and national boundaries.
>
> Intelligence is one of, if not the most, important factors correlated to
> economic, social, and overall success in the United States, and its
> importance is increasing.
>
> No one has so far been able to manipulate IQ to a significant degree
> through changes in environmental factors - except for child adoption and
> that they conclude is not large in the long term - and in light of these
> failures, such approaches are becoming less promising.
>
> The USA has been in denial of these facts. A better public understanding
> of the nature of intelligence and its social correlates is necessary to
> guide future policy decisions.
>
> Also stated is that the average IQ of African Americans is 85; Latinos
> 89; Whites 103; Asians 106.
>
> 89???? Wow! 85 for Blacks???? LOL
>
> Truth hurts, I know
>
> You LIKE voting along side borderline retards?
It was slavery did that.
They killed all the "uppities", that or ran 'em off to Canada.
opel
May 23, 2013, 1:04:24 AM5/23/13
to
On 5/22/2013 10:36 PM, Dhu on Gate wrote:
> They killed all the "uppities", that or ran 'em off to Canada.
Thanks for your servile family tree sharing...
> They killed all the "uppities", that or ran 'em off to Canada.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Dhu on Gate
May 23, 2013, 9:44:29 AM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 02:02:52 -0500, AlleyCat wrote:
> Slavery in what now comprises Canada existed into the 1830's, when slavery
> was officially abolished. Some slaves were of African descent, while
> others were aboriginal (typically called panis, likely a corruption of
> Pawnee). Slavery within Canada's current geography was practiced primarily
> by Aboriginal groups.
Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada quite before that: at the time of the
Revolution it was already the case.
> Slavery in what now comprises Canada existed into the 1830's, when slavery
> was officially abolished. Some slaves were of African descent, while
> others were aboriginal (typically called panis, likely a corruption of
> Pawnee). Slavery within Canada's current geography was practiced primarily
> by Aboriginal groups.
Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada quite before that: at the time of the
Revolution it was already the case.
opel
May 23, 2013, 11:58:05 AM5/23/13
to
On 5/23/2013 7:44 AM, Dhu on Gate wrote:
> Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada quite before that
True, but in the long run meaningless, as all canucks are enslaved by
> Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada quite before that
glacial winters and thus miserable their entire lives.
Barry Bruyea
May 23, 2013, 3:47:27 PM5/23/13
to
freezing N. Dakota, Montana, Utah & Wisconsin. Or, the gaseous
frontier of L.A. or the stink of the East River.
Message has been deleted
opel
May 23, 2013, 6:26:58 PM5/23/13
to
On 5/23/2013 1:47 PM, Barry Bruyea wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:58:05 -0600, opel <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote:
>
>> On 5/23/2013 7:44 AM, Dhu on Gate wrote:
>>> Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada quite before that
>>
>> True, but in the long run meaningless, as all canucks are enslaved by
>> glacial winters and thus miserable their entire lives.
>
> 90% of Canadians live in a climate that is heaven compared to the
> freezing N. Dakota, Montana, Utah & Wisconsin.
You don't know much about climate do you?
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:58:05 -0600, opel <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote:
>
>> On 5/23/2013 7:44 AM, Dhu on Gate wrote:
>>> Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada quite before that
>>
>> True, but in the long run meaningless, as all canucks are enslaved by
>> glacial winters and thus miserable their entire lives.
>
> 90% of Canadians live in a climate that is heaven compared to the
> freezing N. Dakota, Montana, Utah & Wisconsin.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/weather/hi/country_guides/newsid_9383000/9383899.stm
A large part of Canada lies within the Arctic Circle, and only a narrow
strip close to the southern border with the United States has a
temperate climate. Much of this more favoured area has a severe winter
with prolonged frost and snow. With the exception of Hudson Bay, which
is frozen over for about nine months of the year, the northern coast of
Canada on the Arctic Ocean is permanently ice-bound or severely
obstructed for most of the year by ice floes. Only the Pacific coast of
British Columbia and the Atlantic coasts of Newfoundland and the
maritime provinces south of the Gulf of St Lawrence have harbours that
do not regularly freeze in winter.
The reasons for the very cold winters over most of Canada are the high
latitude of much of the country and the generally flat and low-lying
land east of the Rocky Mountains. Cold air from the Canadian Arctic has
virtually no obstruction as it sweeps south and east in winter and
spring, thus importing very cold conditions to most of the country.
Southern Canada also lies in one of the most frequented tracts of
cyclonic depressions in North America; many of these cross the region of
the Great Lakes and the St Lawrence valley before moving out into the
Atlantic. The cold air involved in the circulation of these depressions
frequently has its origin far to the north.
Dhu on Gate
May 23, 2013, 7:08:02 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:12:14 -0500, AlleyCat wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:44:29 GMT,Dhu on Gate says...
allowed, were NOT PART OF CANADA, Dickwit.
> Oh, now we're parsing out what PARTS of Canada. Ahhh, I see. I guess you
> forgot then, that Slavery was abolished in parts of the Untied States
> too, long before the Civil War?
>
> "The Invention of Free Labor" (1991) states, "By 1804 slavery had been
> abolished throughout New England."
But just getting there didn't guarantee you couldn't be dragged back
by slavecatchers and such... the "underground railroad" terminated
*NORTH* of the Republic's borders for good reason.
Dhu
>
> Research... it's not just a nerd thang.
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:44:29 GMT,Dhu on Gate says...
>
>> Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada quite before that: at the time of the
>> Revolution it was already the case.
>
There was no Canada before 1867 and the Maritimes, where slavery was
>> Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada quite before that: at the time of the
>> Revolution it was already the case.
>
allowed, were NOT PART OF CANADA, Dickwit.
> Oh, now we're parsing out what PARTS of Canada. Ahhh, I see. I guess you
> forgot then, that Slavery was abolished in parts of the Untied States
> too, long before the Civil War?
>
> "The Invention of Free Labor" (1991) states, "By 1804 slavery had been
> abolished throughout New England."
But just getting there didn't guarantee you couldn't be dragged back
by slavecatchers and such... the "underground railroad" terminated
*NORTH* of the Republic's borders for good reason.
Dhu
>
> Research... it's not just a nerd thang.
opel
May 23, 2013, 7:10:37 PM5/23/13
to
On 5/23/2013 5:08 PM, Dhu on Gate wrote:
> There was no Canada before 1867
No wonder given the wicked climate up there...
> There was no Canada before 1867
0 new messages