Gated communities.
Freddy
have always attempted to put walls between the law-abiding community and
violent criminals. Back in the old days, the violent criminals were
forced to live in gated communities. Now that commie lobbying has
ensured that violent criminals are free to run wild in the streets, it
is the law-abiding citizens that are forced to pen themselves up in
gated communities. What's wrong with that? How else are people to
protect themselves and their families from violent predators? Given that
commies will continue to promote anarchy, evil, violence and
criminality, and to promote even more lenient sentencing/parole for
dangerous creepy thugs, what is wrong with trying to preserve an oasis
of civilization here and there?
I think that gated communities should be funded by the taxpayer. If
commie lobbyists continue to insist upon foisting convicted hooligans
onto the law-abiding public, then the money saved by not building enough
prisons should be spent building gated communities. How many more
senseless murders and violent crimes are we expected to put with before
the public screams "Enough!"?
The only thing wrong with gated communities is that not every
law-abiding citizen can afford to live in one.
Freddy
Scott Willing
I think locking those self-important wankers into gated communities is a
great idea.
Oh, wait -- you mean the locks aren't on the *outside*?
Oops.
</sarcasm>
-s
Freddy <u...@oh.oh> wrote in message news:3AF15C...@oh.oh...
Orestes
Democrats sneer at gated communities. The better question is: why is it that
fascist assholes always support gated communities and want to live in them?
>People have always attempted to put walls between the law-abiding community
and
>violent criminals. Back in the old days, the violent criminals were
>forced to live in gated communities. Now that commie lobbying has
> ensured that violent criminals are free to run wild in the streets, it
>is the law-abiding citizens that are forced to pen themselves up in
>gated communities. What's wrong with that?
Well. your facts for one. Violent criminals aren't free to run wild in the
streets. IPOF, we are jailing more peole for more crimes than at any other
point in our history?
>How else are people to protect themselves and their families from violent
predators?
A better question is how can we stop people from believing the lies of
paranoid fascist assholes like you.
>Given that commies will continue to promote anarchy, evil, violence and
>criminality, and to promote even more lenient sentencing/parole for
>dangerous creepy thugs, what is wrong with trying to preserve an oasis
> of civilization here and there?
Fascist assholes like you may like order but you certainly don't do anything
to preserve civilization.
> I think that gated communities should be funded by the taxpayer. If
> commie lobbyists continue to insist upon foisting convicted hooligans
> onto the law-abiding public, then the money saved by not building enough
> prisons should be spent building gated communities. How many more
> senseless murders and violent crimes are we expected to put with before
> the public screams "Enough!"?
> The only thing wrong with gated communities is that not every
> law-abiding citizen can afford to live in one.
Seig heil.
> Freddy
ronin
eat bought from the outside? If so, how do you know it's not been tampered
with (by 'creepy thugs, or maybe commies(!))? You'd better start growing
your own inside your compound (sorry; I meant 'gated community') to make
sure the commies haven't tampered with it.
Also, you'd better cancel your phone. The commies might be listening in.
You'd better boil your water, too. Better yet dig your own well, rather than
use the commie water supply.
Oh yeah... don't ever get sick. That's when the 'commies' and 'creepy thugs'
will make their move....
And build a wall around your house, just in case commies and criminals are
secretly living in your gated community.
You can never be TOO sure! 8^)
Ronin
Freddy <u...@oh.oh> wrote in message news:3AF15C...@oh.oh...
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>"Freddy" <u...@oh.oh> wrote in message news:3AF15C...@oh.oh...
>> Why is it that commies always sneer about gated communities?
>
>Democrats sneer at gated communities. The better question is: why is it that
>fascist assholes always support gated communities and want to live in them?
A backlash because of the commie assholes that want to tell other
people where they can live?
Orestes
news:3af1df4b...@news.gate-way.net...
You mean, democrats who don't want to permit them to live in gated
communities, since such communitities
are intrinsically evil. Now what, prey tell, do you find so meritorious in
them?
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>You mean, democrats who don't want to permit them to live in gated
>communities, since such communitities
>are intrinsically evil. Now what, prey tell, do you find so meritorious in
>them?
I've finally figured out where you're coming from. (And that
conclusion will end my part in this thread.) Your problem is, you
want to determine *not* where people live, but *who* lives in Gated
Communities. You want to emulate your ideological heroes, Stalin &
Hitler so *you* can decide who lives in Gated Communites. Places like
Treblinka and various outposts in Siberian were *gated* communities
and when and if you and yours come to power, you get to decide who you
ship to the *Gated Communities*. Now everthing is clear.
>
Freddy
>
> Fascist assholes like you may like order but you certainly don't do anything
> to preserve civilization.
>
> Seig heil.
Gotcha, sucker.
Michael
Freddy
> You mean, democrats who don't want to permit them to live in gated
> communities, since such communitities
> are intrinsically evil.
Why? Because it interferes with your belief that living on the proceeeds
of breaking-and-entering is a valid lifestyle choice? Or is it because
you are a pimp and want your hookers, er, "sex industry workers", to
have the freedom to solicit richer clients?
Freddy
Orestes
"Freddy" <fre...@bow.wow> wrote in message news:3AF2CA...@bow.wow...
Orestes
"Freddy" <fre...@bow.wow> wrote in message news:3AF2C9...@bow.wow...
> Michael
There's a big difference between being ethnophobic and supporting fascist
philosophy Freddy.
Mike O'Brien
communities the question is this: why? What is the fundamental concept which
makes it bad? Do you lock your front door when you are asleep or gone away?
If so, why? What if you have banded together with your family to create an
"elite group" that is allowed in the house? Is it only OK to band together
if you are related? What if you are not related (roomates)? Does that make
it wrong to lock your door? Or should you only have a lock on your bedroom
door and have the front door wide open?
Ever seen an apartment building that locks the main entrance as well as the
individual apartment doors? Is that wrong? If not, why? And if not, why
would that be OK but it's not OK if those people live in town houses rather
than apartments or luxury condos?
On the larger scale, is it wrong to have a military or police to protect
everyone in your country from outside invasion? If not, why?
Point of the story is that it is just a matter of scale. Try to be
consistent in your thinking.
In the words of Forrest Gump "Thats all I have to say about that".
--
/**************************************/
Mike O'Brien
Orestes
news:XPAI6.72303$qc2.18...@typhoon.southeast.rr.com...
What you forgot to consider in your analysis Mike, is that gated communites
are by their nature exclusionist,
and not just for protective reasons.
Perhaps you are the type that believes that Canada shouldn't allow "them
colored folks" to immigrate into the country either? ;-(
> /**************************************/
> Mike O'Brien
>
>
>
Bruce Mills
: What you forgot to consider in your analysis Mike, is that gated communites
: are by their nature exclusionist,
: and not just for protective reasons.
OnLy if you can't afford to live there.
: Perhaps you are the type that believes that Canada shouldn't allow "them
: colored folks" to immigrate into the country either? ;-(
Do you actually think that "Gated Communities" keep out "coloured folks"?
The only reason you think gated communities are evil is because "rich
people" live there. Freedom of association also means freedom *from*
association.
Bruce
--
There is nothing to take a man's freedom away from him, save other men.
To be free, a man must be free of his brothers.
- Ayn Rand
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
How the hell would you know? You don't have a fucking clue what a
fascist is, asshole; at least going by your pathetic use of hyperbole
everytime an debating point comes up you can't deal with. Only a
fascist or a dedicated communist would want to ability to tell people
where they can live and only a complete asshole would think people
were evil just because of where they live.
>
>
Patrick Coghlan
wrote:
>: Perhaps you are the type that believes that Canada shouldn't allow "them
>: colored folks" to immigrate into the country either? ;-(
>
>Do you actually think that "Gated Communities" keep out "coloured folks"?
>
>The only reason you think gated communities are evil is because "rich
>people" live there. Freedom of association also means freedom *from*
>association.
Don't you know that "rich people" and their families are supposed to
be subjected to the same crime, poor quality schools and long hospital
queues so that they can somehow magically make these problems go away?
That's why we're not supposed to allow two-tier anything (at least
until people figure out that the latter ain't gonna happen).
-Pat
*Note* Remove noSpam to reply via e-mail.
nkennedy
In a way its healthier for the rest of us to have all the paranoids
herded together. I thank them.
Neil K
Orestes
> On Fri, 4 May 2001 09:40:41 -0600, "Orestes" <think...@dlcwest.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >"Freddy" <fre...@bow.wow> wrote in message news:3AF2C9...@bow.wow...
> >> A germanophobic bigot wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> > Fascist assholes like you may like order but you certainly don't do
> >anything
> >> > to preserve civilization.
> >> >
> >> > Seig heil.
> >>
> >> Gotcha, sucker.
> >
> >> Michael
> >
> >
> >There's a big difference between being ethnophobic and supporting fascist
> >philosophy Freddy.
>
>
> How the hell would you know? You don't have a fucking clue what a
> fascist is, asshole; at least going by your pathetic use of hyperbole
> everytime an debating point comes up you can't deal with.
You haven't brought up a debating point I can't deal with yet, asshole.
>Only a fascist or a dedicated communist would want to ability to tell
people
> where they can live and only a complete asshole would think people
> were evil just because of where they live.
I've never asked for the right to tell people where they can live nor do I
want it, nor have I said that the people who live in the communites are
evil, you disengenius asshole.
>
Orestes
news:9cut3p$j9a$1...@mohawk.hwcn.org...
> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
>
> : What you forgot to consider in your analysis Mike, is that gated
communites
> : are by their nature exclusionist,
> : and not just for protective reasons.
>
> OnLy if you can't afford to live there.
Or can't abide by the restrictive conditions or "lifestyle requirements"
the "community" decides to impose.
> : Perhaps you are the type that believes that Canada shouldn't allow "them
> : colored folks" to immigrate into the country either? ;-(
>
> Do you actually think that "Gated Communities" keep out "coloured folks"?
Yeah, but they use the device of wealth as their mechanism for doing so.
> The only reason you think gated communities are evil is because "rich
> people" live there. Freedom of association also means freedom *from*
> association.
No, that has little to do with why I think gated communities are evil.
Perhaps you could try to *read and comprehend* my posts.
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
What's the difference between a gated community and an apartment
building or condo in Toronto with doormen and/or security systems?
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>"Bruce Mills" <aj...@freenet.hamilton.on.ca> wrote in message
>news:9cut3p$j9a$1...@mohawk.hwcn.org...
>> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
>>
>> : What you forgot to consider in your analysis Mike, is that gated
>communites
>> : are by their nature exclusionist,
>> : and not just for protective reasons.
>>
>> OnLy if you can't afford to live there.
>
>Or can't abide by the restrictive conditions or "lifestyle requirements"
>the "community" decides to impose.
>
>> : Perhaps you are the type that believes that Canada shouldn't allow "them
>> : colored folks" to immigrate into the country either? ;-(
>>
>> Do you actually think that "Gated Communities" keep out "coloured folks"?
>
>Yeah, but they use the device of wealth as their mechanism for doing so.
>
>> The only reason you think gated communities are evil is because "rich
>> people" live there. Freedom of association also means freedom *from*
>> association.
>
>No, that has little to do with why I think gated communities are evil.
>Perhaps you could try to *read and comprehend* my posts.
Only another convinced communist or nazi could 'read and comprehend'
your posts.
SunnyJim
wrote:
You may a quick and illogical jump from choice to national policy.
If you want to or can affortd to live behind a gate, do so. We still
have the luxury of that choice in Canada. If you want to live without
a locked door, do so, it is your choice.
Bruce Mills
: > OnLy if you can't afford to live there.
: Or can't abide by the restrictive conditions or "lifestyle requirements"
: the "community" decides to impose.
If you don't like the "restrictions", why would you want to live there?
I thought grass-roots "community" standards (hence the term "communism")
was the foundation of all left-wing beliefs? Or is only what *you* decide
is acceptable?
: > Do you actually think that "Gated Communities" keep out "coloured folks"?
: Yeah, but they use the device of wealth as their mechanism for doing so.
So, there is no such thing as "rich" coloured folks, or is it just that
rich coloured folks are less bigoted than rich white folks?
: > The only reason you think gated communities are evil is because "rich
: > people" live there. Freedom of association also means freedom *from*
: > association.
: No, that has little to do with why I think gated communities are evil.
: Perhaps you could try to *read and comprehend* my posts.
I would, if they actually *were* comprehensible to anyone but looney lefty
pinheads...
Perhaps if you broke it down into one syllable words, I might be able to
grasp it.
John G. Spragge
>It's just a matter of degrees folks. To those who are so against gated
>communities the question is this: why? What is the fundamental concept which
>makes it bad?
Nothing. People should certainly have the right to make choices. If someone
wants to live in a gated community, I have no objection, so long as they
don't
ask me for any subsidies, direct or indirect. The post which started this
thread included a call for direct subsidies to gated communities. Obviously,
I
object to that, but I also object to indirect subsidies. For example, I
believe that gates communities should pay municipal taxes on all the
property
from which they exclude the public, just as apartment building pay taxes on
the part of the land they use for interior spaces.
J. G. Spragge
Essays on capital punishment and network ethics at:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~spragge
-------------------------------------------------------
posted via http://mailandnews.com/
Free mailboxes and newsreader services via the web.
Mike O'Brien
news:3af2e...@news.newsdudes.com...
> "Mike O'Brien" <mobr...@carolina.rr.com.nospam> wrote in message
> news:XPAI6.72303$qc2.18...@typhoon.southeast.rr.com...
> > It's just a matter of degrees folks. To those who are so against gated
> What you forgot to consider in your analysis Mike, is that gated
communites
> are by their nature exclusionist,
> and not just for protective reasons.
>
> Perhaps you are the type that believes that Canada shouldn't allow "them
> colored folks" to immigrate into the country either? ;-(
I think you missed my point. If it is OK to protect and be exclusionist on a
household or country level, why is it not OK on a community level? Beside
you have no idea what color I am...PS - I am adopted.
But my deepest appologies for try to interject with a rational discussion
into the flame war. I used to post here regulary, then I stopped because of
people like you. I offer a rational argument and called a racist for no
reason whatsoever. Have a nice life. Bye.
/**************************************/
Mike O'Brien
Orestes
"Bruce Mills" <aj...@freenet.hamilton.on.ca> wrote in message
news:9cvbfd$n6v$1...@mohawk.hwcn.org...
> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
>
> : > OnLy if you can't afford to live there.
>
> : Or can't abide by the restrictive conditions or "lifestyle
requirements"
> : the "community" decides to impose.
>
> If you don't like the "restrictions", why would you want to live there?
> I thought grass-roots "community" standards (hence the term "communism")
> was the foundation of all left-wing beliefs? Or is only what *you* decide
> is acceptable?
>
> : > Do you actually think that "Gated Communities" keep out "coloured
folks"?
>
> : Yeah, but they use the device of wealth as their mechanism for doing so.
>
> So, there is no such thing as "rich" coloured folks, or is it just that
> rich coloured folks are less bigoted than rich white folks?
>
> : > The only reason you think gated communities are evil is because "rich
> : > people" live there. Freedom of association also means freedom *from*
> : > association.
>
> : No, that has little to do with why I think gated communities are evil.
> : Perhaps you could try to *read and comprehend* my posts.
>
> I would, if they actually *were* comprehensible to anyone but looney lefty
> pinheads...
> Perhaps if you broke it down into one syllable words, I might be able to
> grasp it.
No, I doubt that would help a rabid rightwing retard like yourself. (pretty
easy to name call isn't it bruce)
Orestes
"Mike O'Brien" <mobr...@carolina.rr.com.nospam> wrote in message
> Orestes <think...@dlcwest.com> wrote in message
> news:3af2e...@news.newsdudes.com...
> > "Mike O'Brien" <mobr...@carolina.rr.com.nospam> wrote in message
> > news:XPAI6.72303$qc2.18...@typhoon.southeast.rr.com...
> > > It's just a matter of degrees folks. To those who are so against gated
>
> > What you forgot to consider in your analysis Mike, is that gated
> communites
> > are by their nature exclusionist,
> > and not just for protective reasons.
> >
> > Perhaps you are the type that believes that Canada shouldn't allow "them
> > colored folks" to immigrate into the country either? ;-(
> I think you missed my point. If it is OK to protect and be exclusionist on
a
> household or country level, why is it not OK on a community level?
Not at all. I said the operative justifications for the exclusion were
different.
>Beside you have no idea what color I am...PS - I am adopted.
> But my deepest appologies for try to interject with a rational discussion
> into the flame war.
You failed since your analysis is flawed, not because it is a flame war.
>I used to post here regulary, then I stopped because of
> people like you.
Aren't you the pious one. ;-(
> I offer a rational argument and called a racist for no
> reason whatsoever. Have a nice life. Bye.
Well, no, you didn't offer a rational argument. You offered a justification
for gated communities that doesn't hold scrutiny...
except among the fascist and rightoid paranoids who need these "communities"
to insulate themselves from the unwashed masses.
> /**************************************/
> Mike O'Brien
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Small Business
wrote:
I know it is difficult for you to comprehend Bruyea, but they should
gate you in a rubber room.
Small Business
wrote:
>On Fri, 4 May 2001 14:06:34 -0600, "Orestes" <think...@dlcwest.com>
>wrote:
>
>>"Bruce Mills" <aj...@freenet.hamilton.on.ca> wrote in message
>>news:9cut3p$j9a$1...@mohawk.hwcn.org...
>>> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
>>>
>>> : What you forgot to consider in your analysis Mike, is that gated
>>communites
>>> : are by their nature exclusionist,
>>> : and not just for protective reasons.
>>>
>>> OnLy if you can't afford to live there.
>>
>>Or can't abide by the restrictive conditions or "lifestyle requirements"
>>the "community" decides to impose.
>>
>>> : Perhaps you are the type that believes that Canada shouldn't allow "them
>>> : colored folks" to immigrate into the country either? ;-(
>>>
>>> Do you actually think that "Gated Communities" keep out "coloured folks"?
>>
>>Yeah, but they use the device of wealth as their mechanism for doing so.
>>
>>> The only reason you think gated communities are evil is because "rich
>>> people" live there. Freedom of association also means freedom *from*
>>> association.
>>
>>No, that has little to do with why I think gated communities are evil.
>>Perhaps you could try to *read and comprehend* my posts.
>
>Only another convinced communist or nazi could 'read and comprehend'
>your posts.
Hey Brunai, you have a counter that I could borrow to see how many
thousand's of one sentence insults you post?
Small Business
wrote:
>
>"E. Barry Bruyea" <sha...@dusk.com> wrote in message
>news:3af302bf...@news.gate-way.net...
>> On Fri, 4 May 2001 09:40:41 -0600, "Orestes" <think...@dlcwest.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Freddy" <fre...@bow.wow> wrote in message news:3AF2C9...@bow.wow...
>> >> A germanophobic bigot wrote:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> > Fascist assholes like you may like order but you certainly don't do
>> >anything
>> >> > to preserve civilization.
>> >> >
>> >> > Seig heil.
>> >>
>> >> Gotcha, sucker.
>> >
>> >> Michael
>> >
>> >
>> >There's a big difference between being ethnophobic and supporting fascist
>> >philosophy Freddy.
>>
>>
>> How the hell would you know? You don't have a fucking clue what a
>> fascist is, asshole; at least going by your pathetic use of hyperbole
>> everytime an debating point comes up you can't deal with.
>
>You haven't brought up a debating point I can't deal with yet, asshole.
>
Bruyea has a hatred of those, who he considers, to be inferior to
himself. Of course anyone who has different political beliefs fits the
bill.
JMD
"Freddy" <fre...@bow.wow> wrote in message news:3AF2CA...@bow.wow...
> your hookers, er, "sex industry workers", to have the freedom to solicit
richer clients?
> =======================
I believe the current correct term, Freddy, is "self-employed models".
John Dowell
JMD
>
> There's a big difference between being ethnophobic and supporting fascist
> philosophy Freddy.
Something tells me, Orestes, that you don't even know what the term
"fascist" means. I'll tell you. It is anyone beating the pants off a
socialist in a debate. This definition has nothing to do with Svend's
pants.
John Dowell
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>On Fri, 04 May 2001 22:03:06 GMT, sha...@dusk.com (E. Barry Bruyea)
>wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 04 May 2001 16:56:47 -0300, nkennedy <nken...@seascape.ns.ca>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I agree Pat, if people want to live in gated communities let them.
>>>In a way its healthier for the rest of us to have all the paranoids
>>>herded together. I thank them.
>>>
>>> Neil K
>>
>>What's the difference between a gated community and an apartment
>>building or condo in Toronto with doormen and/or security systems?
>>
>>
>
>I know it is difficult for you to comprehend Bruyea, but they should
>gate you in a rubber room.
Well, we know this thread must have run its course in regards any
intelligent comment, what with maggot mind crawling out from under
his/her rock.
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>On Fri, 04 May 2001 22:04:06 GMT, sha...@dusk.com (E. Barry Bruyea)
"Small Mind" is so pathetic, he posts three consecutive posts of one
sentence each and then accuses me of making one sentence insults.
This idiot is about three bricks shy of a load.
E. Barry Bruyea
If Orestes has any doubts what a fascist is, he should just look in a
mirror; as he seems to want to tell people where they can and can't
live.
Small Business
wrote:
>>
>>Hey Brunai, you have a counter that I could borrow to see how many
>>thousand's of one sentence insults you post?
>
>"Small Mind" is so pathetic, he posts three consecutive posts of one
>sentence each and then accuses me of making one sentence insults.
>This idiot is about three bricks shy of a load.
It wasn't an insult. It was fact. I would need a counter to measure
how many one sentence insults you spew.
Small Business
wrote:
>On Sat, 5 May 2001 05:56:20 -0400, "JMD" <wood...@strom.com> wrote:
He wasn't telling people where they can't live. Your delusions are
boundless.
Small Business
wrote:
>>I know it is difficult for you to comprehend Bruyea, but they should
>>gate you in a rubber room.
>
>
>Well, we know this thread must have run its course in regards any
>intelligent comment, what with maggot mind crawling out from under
>his/her rock.
Nothing less intelligent than what you have to say in general, and in
this thread.
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 May 2001 10:08:44 GMT, sha...@dusk.com (E. Barry Bruyea)
You'd need a counter just to figure out how many fingers you've got
left.
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 May 2001 10:11:06 GMT, sha...@dusk.com (E. Barry Bruyea)
I see you're still in the self-humiliation mode.
Ken Dalla Vicenza
"E. Barry Bruyea" wrote:
I wonder if he has to get naked to count to 21.
Small Business
I wonder if you ever have anything valuable to contribute to this
newsgroup?
E. Barry Bruyea
<kennyiss...@home.com> wrote:
Only if he/she has selected a gender it can live with.
>
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 May 2001 13:19:55 GMT, Ken Dalla Vicenza
><kennyiss...@home.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"E. Barry Bruyea" wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 05 May 2001 10:26:10 GMT, Small Business <bin...@home.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Sat, 05 May 2001 10:08:44 GMT, sha...@dusk.com (E. Barry Bruyea)
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Hey Brunai, you have a counter that I could borrow to see how many
>>> >>>thousand's of one sentence insults you post?
>>> >>
>>> >>"Small Mind" is so pathetic, he posts three consecutive posts of one
>>> >>sentence each and then accuses me of making one sentence insults.
>>> >>This idiot is about three bricks shy of a load.
>>> >
>>> >It wasn't an insult. It was fact. I would need a counter to measure
>>> >how many one sentence insults you spew.
>>>
>>> You'd need a counter just to figure out how many fingers you've got
>>> left.
>>
>>I wonder if he has to get naked to count to 21.
>
>I wonder if you ever have anything valuable to contribute to this
>newsgroup?
Why? Was the mathematics too tough for you?
Orestes
"E. Barry Bruyea" <sha...@dusk.com> wrote in message
news:3af3f780...@news.gate-way.net...
No, he's factually correct. I said civic governments shouldn't allow gated
communities because of their inherently undemocratic nature. Sans the gates,
people are free to live whereever they want.
Orestes
"Small Business" <bin...@home.com> wrote in message
news:lj08ftkfpovu2l7s3...@4ax.com...
Orestes
"E. Barry Bruyea" <sha...@dusk.com> wrote in message
news:3af404fd...@news.gate-way.net...
I guess gated communities are good because they will protect you right
thinking people from all the "transgendered freaks" too BB. ;-(
IOW a sexual identity flame is as lame as a mental illness flame.
Small Business
wrote:
>On Sat, 05 May 2001 13:39:11 GMT, Small Business <bin...@home.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 05 May 2001 13:19:55 GMT, Ken Dalla Vicenza
>><kennyiss...@home.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"E. Barry Bruyea" wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 05 May 2001 10:26:10 GMT, Small Business <bin...@home.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >On Sat, 05 May 2001 10:08:44 GMT, sha...@dusk.com (E. Barry Bruyea)
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Hey Brunai, you have a counter that I could borrow to see how many
>>>> >>>thousand's of one sentence insults you post?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>"Small Mind" is so pathetic, he posts three consecutive posts of one
>>>> >>sentence each and then accuses me of making one sentence insults.
>>>> >>This idiot is about three bricks shy of a load.
>>>> >
>>>> >It wasn't an insult. It was fact. I would need a counter to measure
>>>> >how many one sentence insults you spew.
>>>>
>>>> You'd need a counter just to figure out how many fingers you've got
>>>> left.
>>>
>>>I wonder if he has to get naked to count to 21.
>>
>>I wonder if you ever have anything valuable to contribute to this
>>newsgroup?
>
>
>Why? Was the mathematics too tough for you?
Brilliant.
Bruce Mills
: > Perhaps if you broke it down into one syllable words, I might be able to
: > grasp it.
: No, I doubt that would help a rabid rightwing retard like yourself. (pretty
: easy to name call isn't it bruce)
You don't seem to have any trouble doing so.
I notice you didn't bother to explain your point of view, so I will assume
you don't have one.
Bruce
--
"Remember - no matter where you go, there you are."
- Buckaroo Bonzai
Bruce Mills
: No, he's factually correct. I said civic governments shouldn't allow gated
: communities because of their inherently undemocratic nature.
So, you're saying that we should hold a vote on where people can or can
not live? Or who can or can not move into a particular neighbourhood?
Isn't that being "exclusionary"?
I vote we move all the lefties to Baffin Island.
: Sans the gates, people are free to live whereever they want.
No, they are not. Only if you can afford to purchase a house in a
particular neighbourhood, are you "free" to move there. I don't know of
anyone who is giving away houses for free, not even Habitat for Humanity.
E. Barry Bruyea
wrote:
>Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
>
>: No, he's factually correct. I said civic governments shouldn't allow gated
>: communities because of their inherently undemocratic nature.
>
>So, you're saying that we should hold a vote on where people can or can
>not live? Or who can or can not move into a particular neighbourhood?
>Isn't that being "exclusionary"?
>
>I vote we move all the lefties to Baffin Island.
You'd do that to the wolves and other wildlife on Baffin Island?
Orestes
> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
>
> : No, he's factually correct. I said civic governments shouldn't allow
gated
> : communities because of their inherently undemocratic nature.
>
> So, you're saying that we should hold a vote on where people can or can
> not live? Or who can or can not move into a particular neighbourhood?
> Isn't that being "exclusionary"?
Civic governments have to ratify that creation of gated communities, so "a
vote" is already held, Einstein.
Unfortunately, is is using conducted only by the approving bureaucrat.
> I vote we move all the lefties to Baffin Island.
And I vote we move all idiots to Baffin Island. Adios amigo.
Orestes
> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
>
> : > Perhaps if you broke it down into one syllable words, I might be able
to
> : > grasp it.
>
> : No, I doubt that would help a rabid rightwing retard like yourself.
(pretty
> : easy to name call isn't it bruce)
> You don't seem to have any trouble doing so.
Well, you started it Bruce.
> I notice you didn't bother to explain your point of view, so I will assume
> you don't have one.
The whole thread explains the point of view. I know that following threads
probably overtaxes your limited intellect, but give it a try sometime. It
can only help you.
Bruce Mills
: > So, you're saying that we should hold a vote on where people can or can
: > not live? Or who can or can not move into a particular neighbourhood?
: > Isn't that being "exclusionary"?
: Civic governments have to ratify that creation of gated communities, so "a
: vote" is already held, Einstein.
You mean by the "Central Committee", don't you, comrade?. I don't recall
there having been a general, "democratic", vote, like a plebiscite, held
to approve of a gated community, anywhere.
: Unfortunately, is is using conducted only by the approving bureaucrat.
Care to translate?
: And I vote we move all idiots to Baffin Island. Adios amigo.
Don't forget to pack your longies, pal.
Bruce
--
Tell me, where are the flashbacks they all warned us would come?
- Jimmy Buffet
Bruce Mills
: >I vote we move all the lefties to Baffin Island.
: You'd do that to the wolves and other wildlife on Baffin Island?
Don't you know that they, and all the other tree huggers, will live in
"communal" harmony with nature? It will be a model after which the whole
world will style itself!
Bruce Mills
: > You don't seem to have any trouble doing so.
: Well, you started it Bruce.
"Mom! He started it!"
Bruce
--
"Just gaff him in the head to put him out of our misery, but only after he
stops floppin' all over the deck like a one-legged cat tryin' to bury
shit on a frozen pond."
Orestes
"Bruce Mills" <aj...@freenet.hamilton.on.ca> wrote in message
news:9d20ij$jih$4...@mohawk.hwcn.org...
> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
> : > So, you're saying that we should hold a vote on where people can or
can
> : > not live? Or who can or can not move into a particular neighbourhood?
> : > Isn't that being "exclusionary"?
>
> : Civic governments have to ratify that creation of gated communities, so
"a
> : vote" is already held, Einstein.
>
> You mean by the "Central Committee", don't you, comrade?.
No her goebels, that is not at all what I mean. Keep showing how clueless
you
are though you shit for brains fascist.
>I don't recall there having been a general, "democratic", vote, like a
plebiscite, held
> to approve of a gated community, anywhere.
Read on, Einstein.
> : Unfortunately, is is using conducted only by the approving bureaucrat.
>
> Care to translate?
Bruce, you are too fucking stupid to understand anyway.
> : And I vote we move all idiots to Baffin Island. Adios amigo.
> Don't forget to pack your longies, pal.
No Bruce, it is you who'd be going on the trip. English obviously isn't your
first language.
Orestes
> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
> : > You don't seem to have any trouble doing so.
>
> : Well, you started it Bruce.
>
> "Mom! He started it!"
Ah, a mommy's boy to boot. I read once that a lot of fascists had those
sorts of issues. Didn't know it was true
till I had the benefit of your posts.
Bruce Mills
[blah, blah, blah]
Run out of arguments, comrade?
Bruce
---
The budget should be balanced;
the treasury should be refilled;
public debt should be reduced;
and the arrogance of public officials should be controlled."
- Cicero, 106-43 B. C.
Orestes
No her goebels. I could argue a blue streak around an idiot like yourself.
Bruce Mills
: No her goebels. I could argue a blue streak around an idiot like yourself.
Why don't you then? Too busy collecting your welfare cheque, comrade?
Bruce
(that's Herr Goebbels, BTW)
Orestes
> Orestes (think...@dlcwest.com) wrote:
>
> : No her goebels. I could argue a blue streak around an idiot like
yourself.
>
> Why don't you then? Too busy collecting your welfare cheque, comrade?
As I said, you wouldn't be bright enough to appreciate the arguments anyway.
> Bruce
> (that's Herr Goebbels, BTW)
Well, you would definitely know.
Bruce Mills
: As I said, you wouldn't be bright enough to appreciate the arguments anyway.
Try me - you might be surprised.
: > Bruce
: > (that's Herr Goebbels, BTW)
: Well, you would definitely know.
Doesn't do your apparent level of intelligence any good if you can't even
spell the guy's name right...
Bruce
--
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is
the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough
criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that
it becomes impossible to live without breaking laws."
- Ayn Rand, "Atlas Shrugged"
Freddy
>
> On Fri, 04 May 2001 16:56:47 -0300, nkennedy <nken...@seascape.ns.ca>
> wrote:
>
> > I agree Pat, if people want to live in gated communities let them.
> >In a way its healthier for the rest of us to have all the paranoids
> >herded together. I thank them.
> >
> > Neil K
>
> What's the difference between a gated community and an apartment
> building or condo in Toronto with doormen and/or security systems?
The loony left knows there is no difference, but they get off on hating
the rich. Actually, they seem to hate almost everybody they can't con.
Freddy