What Has Canada Done?
"The Right One"
--
Terry Pearson
http://www.rightpoint.org
Q-Why are lefties like turkeys?
A-When one gobbles all the
rest follow suit.
Joe
""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
news:loW0d.401833$gE.366281@pd7tw3no...
> To fight the war on terrorism.
We're waiting for you to enlist!
"The Right One"
"Joe" <nos...@dropdead.com> wrote in message
news:3WW0d.1192$Fg2.3...@newshog.newsread.com...
>
> ""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
> news:loW0d.401833$gE.366281@pd7tw3no...
> > To fight the war on terrorism.
>
> We're waiting for you to enlist!
>
We already know liberals think that terrorism
is a joke. As a matter of fact Paul Martin
supports terrorism.
Anyone that dosen't is "un Canadian"
Detector
Told the PNAC/Bush terrorists to stuff it when they wanted our help in
recruiting legions of new terrorists by killing mothers, fathers, sons and
daughters in Afghanistan and Iraq. Our troops were not told to torture and
sodomize prisoners by the US command, a good reason to keep Canada out of US
adventures forever.
What has Canada done to appease the terrorists?
- Destroying liberty with police state legislation
- Spending over $8 billion on 'security'.
- Not getting tough on trade decisions that are part of 'free trade', when
the US impose duties.
- Sending citizens to Syria for outsourced torture by the RCMP
Can we consider you one of the terrorists, with your unquestioning and
shamefull prostrations to US warlords?
Anyone who supports those terrorists torturing and raping prisoners must
truely be a fascist in his heart.
Tim
>To fight the war on terrorism.
>
>
Well, I guess being from Alberta, you wouldn't know. We are in
Afghanistan. We are patrolling the waters all over the world, trying to
stop "terrorists" from moving about. We are turning in our citizens so
that the Americans can ship them to Syria to torture them.
What more do you want?
"The Right One"
Well so far I see nothing worthwhile
"The Right One"
"Tim" <noco...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:zXZ0d.176$lb5....@news20.bellglobal.com...
> "The Right One" wrote:
>
> >To fight the war on terrorism.
> >
> >
> Well, I guess being from Alberta, you wouldn't know. We are in
> Afghanistan. We are patrolling the waters all over the world, trying to
> stop "terrorists" from moving about. We are turning in our citizens so
> that the Americans can ship them to Syria to torture them.
> What more do you want?
>
How many ships has Canada got,
(hahaha)"Patroling the waters of the World?"
Tim
>"Tim" <noco...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>news:zXZ0d.176$lb5....@news20.bellglobal.com...
>
>
>>"The Right One" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>To fight the war on terrorism.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Well, I guess being from Alberta, you wouldn't know. We are in
>>Afghanistan. We are patrolling the waters all over the world, trying to
>>stop "terrorists" from moving about. We are turning in our citizens so
>>that the Americans can ship them to Syria to torture them.
>>What more do you want?
>>
>>
>>
>Get this: A token contigincy in Afghanistan
>How many ships has Canada got,
>(hahaha)"Patroling the waters of the World?"
>
>
Why don't you look it up?
Rivers..@.......Seascape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
>
> >To fight the war on terrorism.
> >
> >
> Well, I guess being from Alberta, you wouldn't know. We are in
> Afghanistan.
LOL's Tim, why? It's an American made War based on fear mongering, are you
living in fear ;-0,
the funny part is the CIA funded the taliban commrads in the first place.
How stupid are you people.
Mean-while American governments and Canadian Government are fucking over
your chuildrewn
in your own countries and you are waving the flag. What is wrong with you,
don't your freinds also
fighting over there give a dam about their own kids, when your government
terrorist are harming
your families and wishing to remove you from your kids.
Yes brain washing works wonders for stupid people.
We are patrolling the waters all over the world, trying to
> stop "terrorists" from moving about.
What about the government terrorists in canada screwing your kids and wife's
life over with political correct policy's,
and just think when you get home, oh wait, guess what there is no home, they
took your kids and for fighting for your country
you get to be homeless, jobless, and your kids are being brainwashed to hate
you and maybe you'll kill yourself, hay over what the government has and
will do to your family using sexist and bigoted policy's..
We are turning in our citizens so
> that the Americans can ship them to Syria to torture them.
> What more do you want?
Think this couldn't happen, think again..
Even those who serve their country, have had their kids removed from them
for no just cause or become Defrauded Veterans, who paid the high price for
defending their country.
"Babies whose fathers served in the first Gulf war are 50 per cent more
likely to have physical abnormalities than those born to soldiers not sent
to the region, according to a study published today." (see news story on
study done below.)
And all they get in return is being abused by the same government that
falsely claims how they promote Liberty and freedom issues, while removing
their children from them.
Why the hell defend your country, when the Government removes your children
in their sick laws. Tyranny is alive and well in your countries, men, and
fathers.
http://starbulletin.com/2004/03/16/editorial/commentary.html
Tuesday, March 16, 2004
Gathering Place
Jeffery M. Leving and Glenn Sacks
Military dads fall victim
to child-related injustices
Laws granting deployed soldiers special protections against civil legal
actions date back to the Civil War, but few of these protections extend to
family courts and family law. As a result, military men's service to their
country often creates the conditions under which they can become victims of
injustices.
Military service costs some men their children. The federal Uniform Child
Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act provides that if a parent moves a
child to a new state, that state becomes the child's presumptive residence
after only six months. Because a normal military deployment is six months or
longer, if a military wife moves to another state while her husband is
deployed, by the time the husband returns the child's residence has been
switched and the wife is virtually certain to gain custody through the
divorce proceedings in that new state.
The restrictions on military personnel's ability to travel, the high cost
of legal representation and the financial hardships created by child and
spousal support obligations make it difficult for returning service
personnel to fight for their parental rights in another state. Many struggle
even to see their children, much less remain a meaningful part of their
lives.
To solve the problem, the federal Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act
of 1940 must be amended to prohibit the spouses of active-duty military
personnel from permanently moving children to another state without the
permission of the active-duty spouse or of a court. In addition, the UCCJEA
should be modified to state that the presumption of new residence does not
apply if the children are taken in this fashion.
>>Another problem for military fathers is paternity fraud. According to
Carnell Smith, executive director of the National Family Justice
Association, many deployed soldiers are preyed upon by "father shoppers" who
falsely name them as the fathers of their newborns.
"The military provides a steady, easily garnished income as well as
medical care for the baby," Smith says. "It's hard to contest paternity when
you're thousands of miles away and losing a good chunk of your income to
child support. Sometimes the time limit for contesting runs out and the guy
ends up on the hook for 18 years of child support simply because he served
his country."
Several states (not including Hawaii) have addressed the problem through
legislation that allows fathers more time and greater judicial flexibility
to challenge paternity findings.
>> A third family law problem exists for fathers who serve as reservists
and who have child support orders. Support orders are based on civilian pay,
which is generally higher than active-duty pay. When called up, a reservist
sometimes pays an impossibly high percentage of his income in child support,
which hurts his current family. Because those who fall behind in child
support are charged stiff interest and penalties, a returning reservist may
spend years working to pay off arrearages. Some could even face arrest and
incarceration.
Normally, when an obligor loses his job or suffers a pay cut he can go to
court and request a reduction. But since reservists are sometimes mobilized
with as little as one day's notice, few are able to obtain modifications
before they leave. They can't get relief when they return home because the
Bradley Amendment prevents judges from retroactively forgiving support.
The solution is legislation like Missouri's, which requires an automatic
adjustment of support for reservists when they are called up for active
duty.
Navy veteran Taron James, who has joined 600 other victimized veterans to
form Veterans Fighting Paternity Fraud, believes these injustices constitute
a breach of faith.
"When soldiers go off to serve they shouldn't have to worry about being
taken advantage of while they're absent," he says. "Some of the guys making
sacrifices abroad while being put through the ringer here at home must be
wondering why they bothered."
Jeff Leving is the author of "Fathers' Rights: Hard-hitting and Fair
Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute." Glenn Sacks is a
syndicated radio talk show host whose columns on men's and fathers' issues
have appeared in dozens of newspapers nationwide.
Gulf troops' babies 'are 50pc more vulnerable'
By Nic Fleming
(Filed: 24/03/2004)
Babies whose fathers served in the first Gulf war are 50 per cent more
likely to have physical abnormalities than those born to soldiers not sent
to the region, according to a study published today.
Increased risks of genital, urinary and renal abnormalities and deformed
limbs, bones and muscles were found in the Ministry of Defence-funded
survey.
Of 13,191 pregnancies among the partners of male Gulf veterans, 686, or 5.2
per cent, had some form of physical abnormality, compared with 342, or 3.5
per cent, of the 9,758 non-Gulf pregnancies.
Miscarriages were also 40 per cent more common in the pregnancies of wives
and partners of male veterans deployed in the conflict.
Female veterans were found to have no increased risk of suffering
miscarriages.
The six-year study, published in the International Journal of Epidemiology,
found no strong link between service in the Gulf and chromosome, heart and
nervous system damage in the offspring of veterans or of stillbirths.
Dr Pat Doyle, the epidemiologist at the London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine who led the study, called for close monitoring of babies
born to British troops sent to Iraq last year.
Malcolm Hooper, the emeritus professor of medicinal chemistry at Sunderland
University and an adviser to the veterans, said: "The findings will be very
worrying for them.
"I strongly endorse the call for further studies on those who served in Gulf
war two.
"There are grave concerns and significant anecdotal evidence about the
inability to sustain normal pregnancies as a result of Gulf service."
Dr Doyle said the study was important, but warned against reading too much
into the findings. "I believe our findings on renal problems and
miscarriages are important and need to be investigated in greater detail,"
she said.
She added that although "associations were found between fathers' service in
the Gulf war and increased risk of miscarriage and other malformations", the
findings should be interpreted cautiously because of recall bias, the
potential uncertainty of results based on people's memories.
Terry English, of the Royal British Legion, said: "Anecdotal evidence from
veterans has suggested a greater rate of miscarriage and this appears to be
the first scientific evidence that confirms this."
Of 53,000 British troops sent to the first Gulf war, about 630 have died and
almost 6,000 have claimed war pensions.
A range of causes for the illnesses have been suggested including depleted
uranium fallout from munitions, vaccinations administered and tablets taken
before the conflict.
An MoD spokesman said: "It is important to note the researchers have
cautioned that the findings may be susceptible to recall bias, and that it
is a comparison with a control group in which miscarriage may have been
under reported.
"Independent researchers and the military medicine health advisory group of
the Medical Research Council have said that overall there is a lack of
evidence to link reproductive health problems to service in the Gulf."
Mandy Duncan, from Clackmannanshire, has had three children since her
husband Kenny returned from the Gulf. Kenneth, nine, was born with deformed
ears, constant headaches and needs special shoes.
Andrew, eight, wets his bed and has asthma. Heather, six, is partially deaf
and suffers bowel and bladder problems.
Mrs Duncan said last night: "I don't need a study to tell me my kids have
been affected by Kenny's Gulf service. I want to know what the Government is
going to do about it."
Courts, Laws Allow Military Fathers to Be Stripped of Their Children While
They Serve Overseas
When Gary, a US Navy SEAL, was deployed in Afghanistan as part of Operation
Enduring Freedom in the wake of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade
Center, he never dreamed that his service to his country would cost him his
little son.
Under the UCCJEA, if a person takes a child to a new state, that new state
becomes the child's residence if the stay-away is for six months. As a
result, military wives who want to divorce their husbands and gain sole
custody of their children often move to another state shortly after their
husbands are deployed. By the time the father returns, the child's residence
has been switched and it is often difficult for him to even see his
children, much less remain a meaningful part of their lives.
Servicemen, Veterans Fight Paternity Fraud
In the aftermath of the first Persian Gulf War, Taron James was working with
Naval Intelligence and taking part in missions behind Iraqi lines when he
was fraudulently identified as the father of a newborn son. Despite earning
four service medals and three ribbons before his honorable discharge, he has
endured nine years of unremitting government harassment and financial
deprivation, and has fought a constant struggle to stay out of jail.
James, the founder of Veterans Fighting Paternity Fraud, will tell his story
on His Side with Glenn Sacks on Sunday, November 2 at 9 PM. Also joining
Glenn to discuss how our servicemen overseas are often targeted by
unscrupulous "father shoppers" will be: paternity fraud crusader Carnell
Smith, Executive Director of the newly formed National Family Justice
Association (NFJA); former Army paratrooper Buddy Everhart; and Buddy's
wife, Redbird Records recording artist Mary Everhart.
His Side with Glenn Sacks can be heard on KMPC AM 1540 in Los Angeles at 9
PM and KKOL AM 1300 in Seattle at 11 PM every Sunday evening. To listen live
via the Internet from anywhere in the world go to Listen Live. Both radio
and Internet listeners are encouraged to call and participate in the show
live and on the air at 1-800-770-1540. All callers will be mailed a free CD
of the show in which they appeared upon request.
To learn more about paternity fraud, see Glenn's columns Paternity Fraud
Victims Need Justice (Los Angeles Daily News, 3/15/02) and Preserving
Paternity Fraud (Orange County Register, 10/3/02). The latter was coauthored
by Dianna Thompson of the NFJA.
His Side with Glenn Sacks is a nationally syndicated men's and fathers'
issues radio talk show hosted by columnist and commentator Glenn Sacks on
KMPC AM 1540 in Los Angeles at 9 PM and KKOL AM 1300 in Seattle at 11 PM
every Sunday evening.
To help support the show, go to Help Support His Side with Glenn Sacks. To
get CDs and cassettes of all previous and future shows, go to the His Side
Store. To support the advertisers who support the show, go to His Side
Advertisers. To advertise on the show, go to Adve...@HisSide.com
Defrauded Veterans Have Mixed Emotions on Veterans Day
By Jeffery M. Leving and Glenn Sacks
For Torrance photographer Taron James, a decorated veteran of Operation
Northern Watch, Veterans Day always brings mixed emotions. James enlisted in
the Navy at age 20 in the days leading up to the first Persian Gulf War, and
carried out hazardous reconnaissance missions behind Iraqi lines in the
war's aftermath. He earned four service medals and three ribbons before his
honorable discharge in 1994. Yet his reward for his service has been nine
years of unremitting government harassment, financial deprivation, and a
constant struggle to stay out of jail.
"Sometimes it's hard to feel much pride on Veterans Day," he says.
"Sometimes I just feel like a sucker. Veterans Day only reminds me that my
government holds me and other vets in such contempt that it cannot lift a
finger to stop a blatant fraud which victimizes tens of thousands of
servicemen. Worse, the government actively enforces that fraud."
While serving in Iraq, James was notified that a woman he knew back home was
demanding that he pay child support for her newborn son. James knew from the
beginning that the child could not possibly be his. The Navy's Judge
Advocate General is not authorized to handle a serviceman's legal problems
outside of the military justice system, but a sympathetic captain helped him
obtain an agreement from the child's mother for a DNA test.
Before the test could be done, however, the mother reneged on the agreement
and disappeared with the child. James requested a blood test from the Los
Angeles County District Attorney's office, and was told repeatedly over the
next year and a half that he would be notified when there was a new
development in the case. The D.A. instead went to court without James'
knowledge and obtained a default judgment against him. James did not find
out about it until the D.A. seized his driver's license and began taking 50
percent of his take home pay.
Despite subsequent legal appeals and an April, 2001 DNA test which confirmed
that the child is not his, the courts have refused to set aside the
judgment. In the years since the D.A. and later Los Angeles County Child
Support Services have: seized James' tax refund for six years in a row;
blocked him from renewing his notary public license, which in turn caused
him to lose his job as the manager of a business; ruined his credit, denying
him the chance to purchase the business at a low price when the owner
offered it to him for sale; blocked him from obtaining a passport; and
forced him to drop out of college before finishing his degree. James'
problem is not uncommon. According to Carnell Smith, Executive Director of
the National Family Justice Association, military men such as James are
often "preyed upon" by unscrupulous "father shoppers" who can make
fraudulent paternity designations without penalty. "The military provides (a
mother) a steady, easily garnished income as well as medical care for the
baby. It's hard to contest paternity when you're thousands of miles away and
losing a good chunk of your income to child support," he says.
"Sometimes the time limit for contesting runs out and the guy ends up on the
hook for 18 years of child support simply because he served his country."
The solution to the problem is paternity fraud legislation of the type
enacted in Illinois, Georgia, Maryland, Ohio and other states. This
legislation allows putative fathers more time and greater judicial
flexibility in challenging paternity findings.
Similar legislation in California was vetoed last fall by Gov. Gray Davis,
and a revised paternity fraud bill, SB 1030, passed the Senate 34-2 in June
but is currently stalled in the Assembly. James has joined with 600 other
victimized veterans and their families to form the Los Angeles-based
activist group Veterans Fighting Paternity Fraud.
"The problems we face wouldn't be hard for the government to solve if
someone gave a damn," he says. "Every Veterans Day and Memorial Day I think
the same thing -- we don't need parades and speeches -- we need justice."
This column first appeared in the Daily Breeze [Los Angeles] (11/11/03).
Glenn Sacks is a men's and fathers' issues columnist and radio talk show
host. His columns have appeared in dozens of America's largest newspapers.
His radio show, His Side with Glenn Sacks, can be heard every Sunday in Los
Angeles and Seattle.
Glenn can be reached via his website, at www.GlennSacks.com or by e-mail at
Gl...@GlennSacks.com.
Jeff Leving is one of America's most prominent family law attorneys. He is
the author of Fathers' Rights: Hard-hitting and Fair Advice for Every Father
Involved in a Custody Dispute. Visit his website at www.DadsRights.com.
Haximus
It's what we haven't done that is significant.
For example, we didn't support Osama or use him as a pawn against the
Soviets. We didn't support Saddam or use him as a pawn against Iran.
No, that would be primarily the United States, terrorism in America is
the result of their own failed foriegn policy decisions coming back to
bite them in the ass.
Haximus
Pigskin
"Haximus" <e...@t.me> wrote in message news:sA01d.385980$M95.163328@pd7tw1no...
> > To fight the war on terrorism.
>
> It's what we haven't done that is significant.
Thats just plain dumb.
Its what you DO that is significant.
There is an ifinite number of things Canada or any other country didnt do.
and the right and left can choose whatever ones they want to support
anything.
We are 34th in the world as peackeepers. This is from the the UN.
What have we done? We have sat on our backsides.
What influence do we have in the world? NONE!
rob
""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
news:loW0d.401833$gE.366281@pd7tw3no...
Haximus
Pigskin wrote:
> "Haximus" <e...@t.me> wrote in message news:sA01d.385980$M95.163328@pd7tw1no...
>
>>>To fight the war on terrorism.
>>
>>It's what we haven't done that is significant.
>
>
> Thats just plain dumb.
> Its what you DO that is significant.
> There is an ifinite number of things Canada or any other country didnt do.
> and the right and left can choose whatever ones they want to support
> anything.
Did we create a motive for terrorism? The US mucking about in
Afghanistan and the Middle East and elsewhere is responsible for sowing
the seeds of hatred. Did Chechens ask to be taken over and integrated
into the Russian empire? No, they faught tooth and nail and still are.
Now Russia is suffering the consequences of it's empiricism, just like
the US.
> We are 34th in the world as peackeepers. This is from the the UN.
> What have we done? We have sat on our backsides.
> What influence do we have in the world? NONE!
Americans have the most ultra-expensive military in history and are
still having a tough go in Iraq. Why did Bush decide to pull troops out
of Europe? Going to need them in Iraq soon for the decade-long civil
war that's errupting. And the US is practically alone, a lot of nations
could have offered significant support if America had a genuine case but
so far... no WMD.
"The Right One"
"rob" <n...@chan.ce> wrote in message news:kU01d.110782$S55.23676@clgrps12...
> http://www.canadianembassy.org/ca/terror/
>
That's all talk. Where is the action?
Ian King
> To fight the war on terrorism.
Oh, I don't know. Sent our forces to the country that actually sheltered
bin Laden and his operatives rather than get distracted by Bush's Iraq
smokescreen?
Wes Warner
"Haximus" <e...@t.me> wrote in message news:9i11d.386167$M95.347270@pd7tw1no...
>
> Pigskin wrote:
> > "Haximus" <e...@t.me> wrote in message news:sA01d.385980$M95.163328@pd7tw1no...
> >
> >>>To fight the war on terrorism.
> >>
> >>It's what we haven't done that is significant.
> >
> >
> > Thats just plain dumb.
> > Its what you DO that is significant.
> > There is an ifinite number of things Canada or any other country didnt do.
> > and the right and left can choose whatever ones they want to support
> > anything.
>
> Did we create a motive for terrorism?
Yes I think so. We let the Arabs keep the revenue from
the oil we (Western Civilization) discovered for our
use when we needed it. That money should have been held in
trust until they were sufficiently civilized. This 'trust' method
was aplied in Australia, India, and North America with far better results.
Results in Africa, China and elsewhere were mixed due to
incompetent administration.
We (the western world) allowed backward Arab dictators
access to money that should have been held in trust for the
people it belonged to. The money was largely pissed away
and worse, much of it was and is now being used to fund the
*forces of darkness* we are struggling with now.
Affirmative Action is destructive on any scale you try it,
the recipient grows to hate those giving him unearned handouts.
This hate is motive (not excuse) for terrorism.
Wes
Rivers..@.......Seascape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
"Pigskin" <pig...@lowfat.farm> wrote in message
news:vP01d.402887$gE.241459@pd7tw3no...
>
> We are 34th in the world as peackeepers. This is from the the UN.
The UN.....big deal, these are the same moron's who support and promote
sexist and bigoted feminazi's policy's in Canada, and promote the removal of
fathers from there children, while using those same men to fight there BS
wars, and wish to criminalize men and boy's in Canada, but fucking idiots
like you left wing moron's, are too fucking stupid to see you wasting your
time fighting for a bunch of bigoted creeps.
"The Right One"
"Ian King" <vancouverY...@WHATTODOmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:XF11d.403058$gE.313999@pd7tw3no...
We know you don't know
a
>
> "Joe" <nos...@dropdead.com> wrote in message
> news:3WW0d.1192$Fg2.3...@newshog.newsread.com...
> >
> > ""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
> > news:loW0d.401833$gE.366281@pd7tw3no...
> > > To fight the war on terrorism.
> >
> > We're waiting for you to enlist!
> >
>
> We already know liberals think that terrorism
> is a joke. As a matter of fact Paul Martin
> supports terrorism.
>
LOL, care to back that up, in what way does Martin support terrorism. Stop
posting such bs TP.
a
>
> ""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
> news:loW0d.401833$gE.366281@pd7tw3no...
> > To fight the war on terrorism.
> > --
> > Terry Pearson
> > http://www.rightpoint.org
> > Q-Why are lefties like turkeys?
> > A-When one gobbles all the
> > rest follow suit.
> >
>
> Well so far I see nothing worthwhile
Talking to yourself again Terry.
a
>
> "rob" <n...@chan.ce> wrote in message
news:kU01d.110782$S55.23676@clgrps12...
> > http://www.canadianembassy.org/ca/terror/
> >
> That's all talk. Where is the action?
Since you obviously can't read here
http://www.canadianembassy.org/ca/terror/terror_military-en.asp:
a.. Canada has deployed 11,000 military personnel in the War on Terror
since October 2001.
b.. Canada was the first US ally to deploy to the Northern Arabian
Sea/Persian Gulf after 9/11.
c.. A Canadian Lieutenant-General (Rick Hillier) commands NATO's 6,500
International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) troops in Kabul.
d.. Canada supplies ISAF's largest contingent (approx 2,000 troops).
e.. 18 Canadian Warships have been deployed to date in the War on Terror.
f.. Canada has deployed UAVs, CC-150 Polaris Strategic Airlift, CC-130
Hercules Tactical Airlift, CP-140 Aurora Maritime Patrol aircraft, and
CH-124 Sea King Maritime Helicopters to the War on Terror.
g.. The United States Government has awarded 30 US Bronze Stars to
Canadian service personnel in the War on Terror.
(Taken directly from the link provided above)
a
>
> "Ian King" <vancouverY...@WHATTODOmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
> news:XF11d.403058$gE.313999@pd7tw3no...
> > "The Right One" wrote:
> >
> > > To fight the war on terrorism.
> >
> > Oh, I don't know. Sent our forces to the country that actually sheltered
> > bin Laden and his operatives rather than get distracted by Bush's Iraq
> > smokescreen?
>
> We know you don't know
LOL, nice read the first four words and ignore the rest. Terry you are
getting more and more useless with every passing second.
"The Right One"
"a" <paid...@spamhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:rc-dnXXDic4...@golden.net...
>
> ""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
> news:TjZ0d.402337$gE.100192@pd7tw3no...
> >
> > "Joe" <nos...@dropdead.com> wrote in message
> > news:3WW0d.1192$Fg2.3...@newshog.newsread.com...
> > >
> > > ""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
> > > news:loW0d.401833$gE.366281@pd7tw3no...
> > > > To fight the war on terrorism.
> > >
> > > We're waiting for you to enlist!
> > >
> >
> > We already know liberals think that terrorism
> > is a joke. As a matter of fact Paul Martin
> > supports terrorism.
> >
>
> LOL, care to back that up, in what way does Martin support terrorism. Stop
> posting such bs TP.
Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
> news:TjZ0d.402337$gE.100192@pd7tw3no...
> >
> > "Joe" <nos...@dropdead.com> wrote in message
> > news:3WW0d.1192$Fg2.3...@newshog.newsread.com...
> > >
> > > ""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
> > > news:loW0d.401833$gE.366281@pd7tw3no...
> > > > To fight the war on terrorism.
> > >
> > > We're waiting for you to enlist!
> > >
> >
> > We already know liberals think that terrorism
> > is a joke. As a matter of fact Paul Martin
> > supports terrorism.
> >
>
> LOL, care to back that up, in what way does Martin support terrorism. Stop
> posting such bs TP.
Are you just stupid "a" or what? From all the posts and news reports about
Martin political potato heads in the Liberals, it is true he supports
terrorism on children and fathers while only concerned about women's issues,
what's not hard to understand about that.
N. Robinson
>
> >To fight the war on terrorism.
> >
> >
> Well, I guess being from Alberta, you wouldn't know. We are in
> Afghanistan. We are patrolling the waters all over the world, trying to
> stop "terrorists" from moving about. We are turning in our citizens so
> that the Americans can ship them to Syria to torture them.
> What more do you want?
>
> >--
> >Terry Pearson
What has Alberta done? Fuck all but live the high life off the outrageous energy
rip-off, grow fat as pigs, get drunk, fight and complain about Ottawa.
Not a single Albertan signed up for the US Military to fight in Iraq, but all of
those Queer cheerleaders sure wanted others to go. Albertans are nothing but
hypocrites who would be begging on the street if they didn't have oil wells to save
their sorry asses.
Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
"N. Robinson" <nrobin...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2qmimjF...@uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Tim" <noco...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:zXZ0d.176$lb5....@news20.bellglobal.com...
> > "The Right One" wrote:
> >
> > >To fight the war on terrorism.
> > >
> > >
> > Well, I guess being from Alberta, you wouldn't know. We are in
> > Afghanistan. We are patrolling the waters all over the world, trying to
> > stop "terrorists" from moving about. We are turning in our citizens so
> > that the Americans can ship them to Syria to torture them.
> > What more do you want?
> >
> > >--
> > >Terry Pearson
>
>
> What has Alberta done? Fuck all but live the high life off the outrageous
energy
> rip-off, grow fat as pigs, get drunk, fight and complain about Ottawa.
>
> Not a single Albertan signed up for the US Military to fight in Iraq,
Why ? it was the American war, based on fear mongering.
Hell you people are fucking stupid indeed.
notritenoteri
doing? got lots of support? HAven't heard of any upcoming mass marches or
parades.
"Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN> wrote
in message news:eAo1d.53$yW6.21@clgrps12...
Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
"notritenoteri" <colda...@hades.com> wrote in message
news:Zhp1d.4033$H23....@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> fwanky NO ONE is as moronic as you, even a corpse has more smarts. HOws
F4J
> doing? got lots of support? HAven't heard of any upcoming mass marches or
> parades.
You mustachio she-men feminist, just keep on the sidelines, and let the real
men do their jobs, to save children lives from socialist ignorance and
malice.
notritenoteri
court too fucking stupid to win is your problem.
"Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN> wrote
Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
> fwanky your not much of a real man when you let your ex skin your ass in
> court too fucking stupid to win is your problem.
Can you tell me how so, nototbright in the head, please feel free to post
your facts.
"The Right One"
"Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN> wrote
>
> "notritenoteri" <colda...@hades.com> wrote in message
> news:4Pq1d.4043$H23....@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> > fwanky your not much of a real man when you let your ex skin your ass in
> > court too fucking stupid to win is your problem.
>
> Can you tell me how so, nototbright in the head, please feel free to post
> your facts.
>
--
Terry Pearson
http://www.rightpoint.org
Q-Why are lefties like turkeys?
A-When one gobbles all the
rest follow suit.
>
>
>
a
"Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN> wrote
>
> "a" <paid...@spamhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:rc-dnXXDic4...@golden.net...
> >
> > ""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
> > news:TjZ0d.402337$gE.100192@pd7tw3no...
> > >
> > > "Joe" <nos...@dropdead.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3WW0d.1192$Fg2.3...@newshog.newsread.com...
> > > >
> > > > ""The Right One"" <nosoc...@right.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:loW0d.401833$gE.366281@pd7tw3no...
> > > > > To fight the war on terrorism.
> > > >
> > > > We're waiting for you to enlist!
> > > >
> > >
> > > We already know liberals think that terrorism
> > > is a joke. As a matter of fact Paul Martin
> > > supports terrorism.
> > >
> >
> > LOL, care to back that up, in what way does Martin support terrorism.
Stop
> > posting such bs TP.
>
> Are you just stupid "a" or what? From all the posts and news reports
about
> Martin political potato heads in the Liberals, it is true he supports
> terrorism on children and fathers while only concerned about women's
issues,
> what's not hard to understand about that.
>
And you have yet to post evidence of this beyond you saying this is true.
a
>
> "Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN>
wrote
> in message news:y7s1d.5053$KU5.2207@edtnps89...
> >
> > "notritenoteri" <colda...@hades.com> wrote in message
> > news:4Pq1d.4043$H23....@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> > > fwanky your not much of a real man when you let your ex skin your ass
in
> > > court too fucking stupid to win is your problem.
> >
> > Can you tell me how so, nototbright in the head, please feel free to
post
> > your facts.
> >
> Arguing with a coke head again?
I didn't think he was arguing you Terry.
notritenoteri
We never hear from Mrs. Ex-fwanky.
QED
"Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN> wrote
notritenoteri
wouldn't matter.
Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
It up to you to show it's not true..
Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
>
> "Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN>
wrote
> in message news:y7s1d.5053$KU5.2207@edtnps89...
> >
> > "notritenoteri" <colda...@hades.com> wrote in message
> > news:4Pq1d.4043$H23....@newscontent-01.sprint.ca...
> > > fwanky your not much of a real man when you let your ex skin your ass
in
> > > court too fucking stupid to win is your problem.
> >
> > Can you tell me how so, nototbright in the head, please feel free to
post
> > your facts.
> >
> Arguing with a coke head again?
No Terry, humoring myself, as this idiot can not bring anything forward,
other then more of it own poop
it plays in while stinking up the room
Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN Frank Rivers.......
> How do you do your coke terry up the ass of course your all ass so it
> wouldn't matter.
Having a bath in your own poop again Alice.
a
"Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN> wrote
No Marky Mark, it is your claim, you have to back it up. How do you expect
anyone to counter a vague accusation when you provide no evidence, or even
details for that matter.
Spatuskin.@maximum..thuder.ott.gc.nic.co Carilzinki Spatuskin
notritenoteri
such a juvenile infantile term. I know your thinking is infantile but write
like a man fwanky say it SHIT
"Frank Rivers......." <Frank Rivers..@.......Seas..cape.towers..GCAN> wrote
a
"Carilzinki Spatuskin" <Carilzinki Spatuskin.@maximum..thuder.ott.gc.nic.co>
wrote in message news:6QY1d.32572$XP3.6761@edtnps84...
Provided no evidence of what, and lied about what?
Spatuskin.@maximum..thuder.ott.gc.nic.co Carilzinki Spatuskin
> come on fwanky say it shit it sounds so good rolling off the tongue, poop
is
> such a juvenile infantile term. I know your thinking is infantile but
write
> like a man fwanky say it SHIT
i have to ask, just how long have you been an over inflated stooge with no
common sense.