Zionist News + Jew Lawyer Blast CHRC & Warman - As NAZIS!
GayKenMcVay
Zionist News + Jewish Lawyer Blast CHRC & Warman - As NAZIS!
Zionist owned newspaper National Post, and noted jurist
Ezra Levant have blasted the Canadian Human Rights Commission,
and pet complainer thereof Richard Warman.
They are being denounced as NAZIS!
In a banner-headline huge editorial in the National Post,
across Canada,on Wednesday July 15 2009, lawyer Ezra Levant
really lays into CHRC and criminal Richard Warman.
Levant starts with a denunciation of the criminal activities
of CHRC, as exposed at the CHRC hearing March 25 2008.
At that time Alain Monfette Bell Canada security officer, had
testified that CHRC had illegally accessed the internet, using
the private account of an innocent woman, Nelly Hechme.
Marc Lemire has in fact laid criminal charges against CHRC
in connection with these criminal acts.
In his editorial, Lawyer Ezra Levant further denounces CHRC and
Richard Warman as NAZIS!
Levant states that CHRC members have been active members of
neo-nazi groups for years.
Further he states that they have published countless anti-semitic,
anti-gay and anti-black comments on the internet.
CHRC have even admitted these criminal acts under oath!
Dean Steacy, a senior CHRC member has testified that at least
7 CHRC staff are members of nazi groups.
Especially noted is that former CHRC investigator and current
serial witness and perpetual complainer RICHARD WARMAN is a
prominent NAZI among the seven!!
The tribunal investigating the illegal and criminal acts of CHRC
4 months ago, was forced to issue a damning report on the illegal
activities of CHRC and Warman:
"I do not see any acceptable reason for [Richard] Warman to have
participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard [neo-nazi] sites."
It appears that CHRC has more NAZI members than did the
Canadian Nazi Party when it existed briefly in the 1960's.
Neo-Nazi hate, courtesy of the CHRC
Ezra Levant, National Post Published: Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Last month, a parliamentary committee invited Jennifer Lynch, the head
of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, to answer questions about her
agency's conduct. She refused to attend, sending in her place a deputy
who could not answer key questions put to him by MP Russ Hiebert.
Now that Parliament is safely on summer holidays, Lynch has bravely
emerged from her bunker -- the CHRC office actually is a bulletproof
bunker -- to accuse Hiebert of getting his facts wrong.
But it's Lynch's version that's false.
In her July 11 letter to the National Post, Lynch denies that CHRC
staff hacked into the Internet account of a private citizen to cover
their tracks as they logged into their memberships in neo-Nazi
websites. Lynch says both the Privacy Commissioner and the RCMP "found
no evidence to support this allegation."
But that's not true. The Privacy Commissioner's staff did not
investigate the hacking -- that is not within their jurisdiction. They
only examined "whether the CHRC improperly collected, used, disclosed
or retained personal information about the complainant," a different
and irrelevant question.
And neither did the RCMP declare that there was "no evidence" to the
accusation. They investigated for months. Only when the case led them
to a U. S.-based Internet server did they drop their investigation
rather than pursue it internationally. That's quite a different thing
from exonerating the CHRC.
There was a hearing into the matter, though, at the Canadian Human
Rights Tribunal on March 25, 2008. Alain Monfette, Bell Canada's
security officer, testified that the CHRC accessed the Internet using
that private citizen's Bell account. Lynch's lawyers sat in
embarrassed silence -- they did not rebut Monfette's evidence nor even
bother to cross-examine him.
As Nelly Hechme, the hacking victim, told reporters, "I merely wanted
some answers and maybe a little justice, but that doesn't seem to be
the case. I feel like I'm basically being told to just accept it."
Lynch is pretending that Hechme doesn't even exist. But that pales in
comparison to Lynch's statement that CHRC staff did not "post hateful
messages on the Internet."
In fact, CHRC employees have been active members of neo-Nazi
organizations for years, and have published countless anti-Semitic,
anti-gay and anti-black comments online. CHRC employees have admitted
to this under oath. On the same day Monfette testified about the
hacking, CHRC investigator Dean Steacy testified there were no
guidelines about what CHRC staff could do using their online Nazi
memberships.
Steacy, for example, used his Nazi membership to write encouraging
words to a racist group called B. C. White Pride. He praised them,
told them their racist posters were "great" and promised to distribute
their literature. Your tax dollars at work.
Other CHRC investigators went further. One praised Nazi leaders ( "I
still say [Adrien] Arcand is our man!"); called for Canadian police to
discriminate against blacks ( "exactly when will white cops understand
that they should stand by THEIR race?!"); and trashed a Jewish youth
group ( "if people spent the time building fellow WNs [White
Nationalists] up rather than tearing them down we'd be dangerous.
Unless your goal is to tear people down in which case go join Hillel
or something.")
Neo-Nazi hate, courtesy of the CHRC
Ezra Levant, National Post Published: Wednesday, July 15, 2009
At least 12 CHRC prosecutions have been tainted by CHRC staff or
witnesses using agent provocateur tactics like that. They've even
written Nazi shorthand for "Heil Hitler".
Steacy testified that at least seven CHRC staff have access to Nazi
membership accounts: Steacy himself, his two personal assistants,
investigator Sandy Kozak, lawyer Giacomo Vigna, manager John
Chamberlin, and former CHRC investigator and current serial witness
and complainant Richard Warman.
By sheer numbers, the Canadian Human Rights Commission has more Nazi
members than the tiny Canadian Nazi Party did when it briefly existed
in the 1960s.
If real police and prosecutors behaved this way, they would be
suspended and any criminal charges tainted by such misconduct would be
stayed. Not so at the CHRC, which lacks an internal affairs office or
written operational policies. It doesn't even have a code of ethics.
It's become so embarrassing that even the tribunal -- the kangaroo
court that rubber-stamps CHRC censorship prosecutions -- has ended its
silence.
Four months ago, the tribunal examined some of these comments,
including one denouncing Jewish politicians as "scum."
"I do not see any acceptable reason for [Richard] Warman to have
participated on the Stormfront or Vanguard [neo-Nazi] sites," wrote
the tribunal. "It is possible that his activity in this regard could
have precipitated further hate messages in response ... The evidence
in this case of his participating on Internet sites similar to the
Northern Alliance [neo-Nazi] site is both disappointing and
disturbing."
It's a scandal that the CHRC joins Nazi groups on the taxpayers' dime.
But instead of recognizing the problem and fixing it, Lynch is trying
to cover it up.
The Prime Minister needs to intervene. It's time Stephen Harper fired
everyone with a Nazi membership at the CHRC, along with the woman who
is permitting their bigotry. - Ezra Levant blogs at ezralevant.com
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:53:30 -0400
Subject: Fwd: *** RCMP release documents on the CHRC Criminal Hacking
Investigation ***
From: Paul Fromm <pa...@paulfromm.com>
RCMP release documents on the CHRC Criminal Hacking Investigation
Investigation dropped due to jurisdictional issues with the United
States
And the RCMP investigates Lemire for daring to complain
http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/july18-09_rcmp_access_req.html
In late June, 2009, the RCMP responded to an Access to Information
request filed by human rights activist Marc Lemire for all documents
surrounding the criminal investigation of the Canadian Human Rights
Commission and their theft of an innocent woman’s internet connection.
The evidence showing that the CHRC hacked into the internet connection
of Nelly Hechme came to light as a result of evidence subpoenaed by
Marc Lemire. The evidence was sworn testimony by Alain Monfette from
Bell Canada’s Law Enforcement Team and examination of CHRC employees
during a May 2008 Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing.
The heavily censored documents released by the RCMP show that the
recent statements made by the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s Chief
Commissioner Jennifer Lynch were inaccurate and misleading. Lynch
wrote in July 11, 2009’s National Post that “Mr. Hiebert says there is
uncontradicted expert evidence that a commission employee
illegitimately used the Internet connection of a third party. Two
independent investigations, one by the RCMP expert unit responsible
for computer crimes, and one by the Privacy Commissioner of Canada,
found no evidence to support this allegation.”
Highlights from RCMP Documents
The RCMP found the case to be “Complete – Unsolved”
The RCMP could not pursue the case because evidence trail lead to the
United States where RCMP has no authority and no MLAT existed to
compel information
After a message from CHRC’s lawyer Kathleen Fawcett, the RCMP turned
around and investigated Lemire for daring to lay the complaint. RCMP
censored what the message from CHRC said.
As part of the CHRC rebuttal to the charges, they submitted their own
copy of the March 2009 Transcript, which has been found to be highly
questionable and “missing” key testimony.
The RCMP found that the distance from the CHRC offices to the WiFi
access point of Nelly Hechme was only a mere 400 meters (across an
open field)
The RCMP saw this investigation as highly political and had multiple
printouts from Ezra Levants website, articles from the National Post
and other internet websites.
Multiple CHRC employees were involved in case and “liaised” with the
RCMP.
This included the manager of the CHRC’s IT dept.
The Ottawa Police reviewed the case, accepted it, and forwarded it to
the RCMP, who had more expertise in federal matters.
All RCMP Documents
Detailed analysis of the RCMP documents
This is the general summary of the RCMP’s investigation of the
Canadian Human Rights Commission.
Notice the “Clearance status” shows the investigation by the RCMP as
“Complete – unsolved”
In the summary, the RCMP notes that “Matter was investigated by OPS
[Ottawa Police Service] but follow-up is now done by A Div ITCU
[Integrated Technical Crime Unit – RCMP].” This shows that the
Ottawa Police Service investigated the case, accepted it, and
sent it onto the Integrated Technical Crime Unit of the RCMP
because it involved a Federal Government Agency.
At the Ottawa Police Service, the complaint was investigated by Martin
Dompierre. Detective/Forensic Examiner. Criminal Investigative
Services. HighTech Crime Unit. Ottawa Police Service.
The summary continues: “Investigation completed as of 2008-11-10
reveals not enough evidence to pursue charges.”
As described in more detail below, the RCMP were not able to use sworn
legal affidavits provided by the owner of Stormfront, because the
affidavit was not collected pursuant to a Canada / USA “MLAT”, which
is a Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Treaty.
“MLAT” agreements with the USA are generally only implemented for
serious criminal matters, such as murder, child exploitation or
kidnapping, because it involves getting many different agencies
involved, including provincial Attorney Generals.
During the course of the investigation, the officer met with RCMP
lawyer Christine Morris of IPOC (Integrated Proceeds of Crime division
- RCMP) who specializes in multi-jurisdictional investigations. Any
MLAT request by the police have to be reviewed and vetted by an IPOC
counsel, who then submits it to IAG (International Assistance Group -
part of the Department of Justice Criminal Law Branch) [See
Department of Justice - The Federal Prosecution Service Handbook at
http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/dept-min/pub/fps-sfp/fpd/ch43.html#43_6_3
]
While the specific recommendations of Morris were censored, it would
seem to be that, as a result of that meeting, the affidavit and other
sworn legal information provided from the United States were not
allowed to be used as evidence in the criminal investigation of the
CHRC.
In a RCMP’s “Briefing Note: Theft of telecommunications – CHRC,” the
RCMP officer wrote that: “The information obtained from Marc Lemire
were obtained without legal authorization and involved the USA
country. To use the evidence, it would require that an MLAT be
obtained and executed.”
Thus without that information about the IP address CHRC investigator
Dean Steacy(Internet codename: JADEWARR) used when he accessed the
Stormfront website as “Jadewarr”, there was a limited chance of the
likelihood of a successfulprosecution.
RCMP investigate Marc Lemire for daring to complain about CHRC
One of the most shocking revelations to come out of the RCMP documents
is that the RCMP actually investigated Marc Lemire for daring to lay
the criminalcomplaint against the CHRC!
Only a few weeks before the RCMP was going to close the case, they
received “a message from Kathleen FAWCETT, lawyer at the CHRXCH”
[Canadian Human RightsCommission]. The contents of the message sent
by the CHRC’s lawyer were censored from the report, but the RCMP
immediately turned around and investigated Lemire.
The report stated “writer [RCMP Sgt. Stephane Turgeon] requested the
assistance of DCAU for a background check of COM LEMIRE, Marc.” The
“DCAU” is the RCMP’s “DIVISION CRIMINAL ANALYTICAL UNIT.”, which
performs CPIC checks on Canadians.
CPIC is an acronym for the Canadian Police Information Centre.
The RCMP administers this database and says that CPIC “is a
computerized system that provides tactical information about crimes
and criminals.”
This is the most highly secure police database in Canada and holds
private details on some 10 million Canadians.
The CPIC computer has four data banks: Investigative, Identification,
Intelligence and Ancillary. Contained in those four data banks are:
Vehicles: License information, including validation tags, stolen,
abandoned or wanted in connection to a crime.
Persons: Persons wanted by the police or accused persons; persons on
probation or parole; persons against whom prohibition orders have been
placed (e.g.driving, possession of firearms); missing persons,
including children; bodymarks/scars;
clothing and dental records or body parts that can be
cross-referenced; amnesia,
comatose or disaster victims.
Property: Stolen guns, articles and securities.
Marine: Stolen and abandoned boats and boat motors.
Dental Characteristics: Individual dental records (a sub-system of
Persons File)
Canada Firearms Registry: Every Canadian owning a firearm or having a
license.
Cross-referenced with every gun serial number to registered owner
(this alone contains over 10 million records)
Criminal Records: Full criminal record information.
Criminal Record Synopsis: Condensed version of criminal records
supported by fingerprints maintained by the RCMP’s Information and
Identification Services.
CPIC Surveillance: Contains criminal intelligence information and
information on persons, vehicles and boats which are under
surveillance.
So, what lies did the CHRC spin for the RCMP to do an about-face and
parse through Marc Lemire’s most intimate details, which could include
information from his dental records to marks/scars to his vehicle
information?
Unfortunately, the RCMP completely censored what the CHRC’s lawyer
said, but based on the CHRC past paranoid ranting on “security,” it is
easy to make an educated guess.
Through out the entire human rights hearing against Marc Lemire, the
CHRC constantly used the sphere of alleged “security threats” to
stifle the defence that Lemire was putting up. In order to keep the
lid on the CHRC spying operations, they even tried to have Lemire
banned from his own hearing, using the fraudulent accusations of
“security threats.” [CHRT ruling – Para 15-17]
CHRC lawyers – spinning tales of threats and imaginary security
breaches – used this tactic as a way to block hundreds of questions by
invoking “national security” and Section 37 of the Canada Evidence
Act, which stopped dead all answers to questions. Looking back now,
it is clear that the CHRC invoked Section 37 to cover up their abuse
and misdeeds. It had nothing to due with security at all.
For instance, the CHRC invoked Section 37 to stop all questions about
the “Jadewarr” account, which was used by CHRC employees to infiltrate
websites and post messages.
The CHRC screamed security! Security! Security! over any questions
about “Jadewarr”. Now that the answers have been revealed, the utter
abuses of “security” claims are clear and documented.
The CHRC have used false claims of “security” so often – to hide
everything they were doing – even the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
became disgusted by their abusive behavior.
In 2008, the Tribunal chastised the CHRC for their numerous groundless
claims of “security.” The Tribunal ruled that:
“[9] The outcome of the [Marc Lemire’s Federal Court Appeal to] s. 37
matter gives me pause to question the soundness of the Commission's
invocation of public security concerns with respect to the testimony
of these witnesses.”
The Canadian Human Rights Commission is shameless and has proven in
the past, they are willing to do and say anything to protect their
censorship franchise.
Is it really hard to believe that the CHRC would call up the RCMP and
spin some imaginary tale of terror, in order to throw the RCMP off
their dirty corrupt scent?
Or perhaps the CHRC could just sign onto to one of the many websites
they have memberships on and post a “violent threat” themselves, then
use it as justification to get Lemire. It all might sound pretty
conspiratorial... BUT the CHRC does have a proven track record of
calling up police agencies and having them investigate
people who dare to file complaints against them or their friends.
Perhaps the CHRC was trying to stop the 9 months straight of negative
publicity they were receiving as a result of being under the cloud of
a criminal investigation?
By having the RCMP do the dirty, and investigate every detail of
Lemire’s life in hopes that they might find something. After all, it
would have been a great coup de grace to have Lemire charged with some
criminal offence in the end.
Then Jennifer Lynch and her cronies could do their usual finger
wagging diversion and point to Lemire and say, “see he’s the
criminal.... not us!”
On an interesting side note, if Lemire was a criminal or corrupt, he
would easily be able to get a nice cushy job at the CHRC in the
future… After all, the CHRC and ethics don’t mix.
For background information on the hacking allegations made against the
CHRC and the criminal complaint filed with the RCMP, please see:
March 26/08: CHRC Operatives Hack Unsecured Wireless Access point to
Post Hate Messages!
March 26/08: Lid Blown Off Commission Internet Spying in Lemire Case
May 17/08: UPDATE: on Criminal Complaint against Canadian Human Rights
Commission for Stealing innocent woman's internet connection
April 18/08: Privacy Act complaint filed against Canadian “Human
Rights” Commission for unauthorized use of an Internet connection
April 10/08: Motion for Disclosure of CHRC fake names and to reopen
hearing over CHRC WiFi Hacking
June 6/08: CHRC Transcript Irregularities [See YouTube video here]
Nov 21/08: Criminal Complaint against CHRC: Evidence leads to the USA,
where the RCMP can’t follow up. RCMP won't investigate further
Jan 30/09: Privacy Commissioner rules on CHRC WiFi Hacking Allegations
after a shockingly poor investigation
Link: http://www.freedomsite.org/legal/july18-09_rcmp_access_req.html
It appears that CHRC has more NAZI members than did the
Canadian Nazi Party when it existed briefly in the 1960's.
The Prime Minister of Canada needs to act - NOW.
Fire all the nazi criminals involved at CHRC,
and prosecute them criminally - before Remembrance Day.
Otherwise, for what did all the millions die, fighting the nazis?
Perhaps the Israel Mossad should take care of these nazis,
permanently, as they did with the Munich terrorists, Eichmann et al?
Since Israelis are now searching the world for body parts, perhaps
they could pick up Richard Warman and his nazi colleagues and use them
for body parts/organ harvesting? If parts are not good enough, then
they can always use for medical experiments...
Warman and his gang of nazis must have some usable body parts,
for the body-snatchers.
Now that Marc Lemire has kicked the CHRC in the balls,
with the admission by CHRC that some of its' rulings are
illegal and contravene the Charter of Rights & Freedoms,
what will Warman then do for a living - wash dishes?
And, now that an Appeal is filed against CHRC & Warman
regarding some ill-gotten money from another victim, will
Warman finally be charged and convicted for his criminal acts?
For the real TRUTH about ZHIDS, visit the world top-rated website
for JEW-WATCH:
http://www.jewwatch.com
Other useful websites include:
ZUNDELSITE - www.zundelsite.org
IHR - www.ihr.org
Stormfront - http://www.stormfront.org
KenM...@vex.net
Picture of disgusting pervert at:
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_Kenneth_McVay.jpg
Ken McVay invites callers,and visitors,to his homosexuals escorts
office: VISIT at:
#5 - 1601 - Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada, or my home at:
Apt. 3108 - 995 Bowen Road, Nanaimo, B.C., Canada
or call: 1-250-616-9431
Feel free to subscribe McVay to mail lists for sex,
homosexuals and the like.
Grosvenor may be gone, but others are now taking up his campaigns.
Kenneth McVay OBC
GayKenMcVay <GayKe...@nazikor.org> wrote:
>Ken McVay OBC < kmc...@shell.vex.net > wants all to know:
Oh, look! There's William Grosvenor's favourite
newsreader again!
Updated Grosvenor Legal Documents & Extortion conviction:
http://William-Grosvenor.info
Grosvenor fled Canada after complying with a court
order to pay a $50,000 libel award and costs in excess
of $30,000 resulting from his penchant for defamation,
libel, assault and extortion.
What sort of "man" would leave his wife behind to face
the music after he runs away?
William Grosvenor, of course, the True Face of "White nationalism."
--
"The Nizkor website (secretly financed by the ADL and other Jewish front
organizations) is behind it." (David Irving, whining about Google's
reminder of his disgrace.) The facts:
http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irving-david/judgment-00-00.html
GayKenMcVay
Sario Grosvenor
<GayKe...@nazikor.org> wrote:
>Grosvenor may be gone, but others are now taking up his campaigns.
Yes, you maggot, you are gone - but only from Alberta, from whence,
your cowardly yellow tail shoved up your worthless ass, you fled to
Bulacan and your whore, leaving your wife and family destitute and
homeless.
What an asshole you are, Bill.
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2008/2008canlii57728/2008canlii57728.html