Sick liberal fuck

[Yer Pal Al]

"Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-walk-around-me-or-walk-me-bus-stop

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cb58c916-4be2-4a9c...@h1g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...

> "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
> Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
> http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-walk-around-me-or-walk-me-bus-stop

Liberal?! Nothing there about him being Liberal. Nothing there but
conservative umbrage about "killing babies" before birth instead of after.
Gory pictures there, but not nearly as gory as Sandy Hook.

[Yer Pal Al]

On Mar 21, 3:08 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:cb58c916-4be2-4a9c...@h1g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...

>
> > "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
> > Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "

> >http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-wal...

>
> Liberal?!  Nothing there about him being Liberal.

You can count the number of conservative, black, pro-late-abortion
advocates on no fingers.

> Nothing there but
> conservative umbrage about "killing babies"

You don't take umbrage at a doctor who severes the spines of breathing
babies and says, "This baby is big enough to walk around with me or
walk me to the bus stop.’”?

Of course this is rhetorical question. You've long-ago marginalized
yourself as racist-ghoul, liberal-crackpot that runs to the defense of
a doctor who's facing 7 counts of 1st degree and 1 count of 3rd degree
murder.

> before birth instead of after.

Maybe Eileen can explain child birth to you?:

“After the baby was expelled, Cross noticed that he was breathing,
though not for long."

> Gory pictures there, but not nearly as gory as Sandy Hook.

Really? You've seen pictures of the Sandy Hook masacre? I hear Sicko
fuck Michael Moore is eager for some new porn. This could be you "in"
with the slobby fat man if you show him your pictures.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:6504cea6-f2b9-4b55...@qo9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 21, 3:08 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

>> messagenews:cb58c916-4be2-4a9c-ab7d->00f3e8...@h1g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...

>>
>> > "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
>> > Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
>> >http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-wal...
>>
>> Liberal?! Nothing there about him being Liberal.
>
>You can count the number of conservative, black, pro-late-abortion
>advocates on no fingers.

And if he's just in to it for the money?

>> Nothing there but
>> conservative umbrage about "killing babies"
>
>You don't take umbrage at a doctor who severes the spines of breathing
>babies

Just because it was allegedly breathing, doesn't mean it had a brain. Were
you there? Have you seen actual autopsy reports?

>and says, "This baby is big enough to walk around with me or
>walk me to the bus stop.��?

You think it's criminal to have a bad taste in jokes?

>Of course this is rhetorical question. You've long-ago marginalized
>yourself as racist-ghoul, liberal-crackpot that runs to the defense of
>a doctor who's facing 7 counts of 1st degree and 1 count of 3rd degree
>murder.

Bullshit

>> before birth instead of after.
>
>Maybe Eileen can explain child birth to you?:
>
>�After the baby was expelled, Cross noticed that he was breathing,
>though not for long."

My first born lived 10 days. Had she lived longer, she would have
been -severely- brain damaged. I've been there - you haven't

>> Gory pictures there, but not nearly as gory as Sandy Hook.
>
>Really? You've seen pictures of the Sandy Hook masacre?

I've read descriptions.

>I hear Sicko
>fuck Michael Moore is eager for some new porn. This could be you "in"
>with the slobby fat man if you show him your pictures.

You seem eager to show pictures of aborted fetuses, yet reluctant to show
pictures of the results of gun violence - why is that?

[Yer Pal Al]

On Mar 21, 6:56 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:6504cea6-f2b9-4b55...@qo9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On Mar 21, 3:08 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

> >> messagenews:cb58c916-4be2-4a9c-ab7d->00f3e8acb__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@h1g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...

>
> >> > "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
> >> > Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
> >> >http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-wal...
>
> >> Liberal?! Nothing there about him being Liberal.
>
> >You can count the number of conservative, black, pro-late-abortion
> >advocates on no fingers.
>
> And if he's just in to it for the money?

As opposed to believing he's providing a vital service to women?
Murdering babies without the rationalization "choice"? You are
imagining an even sicker motherfucker?

> >> Nothing there but
> >> conservative umbrage about "killing babies"
>
> >You don't take umbrage at a doctor who severes the spines of breathing
> >babies
>
> Just because it was allegedly breathing, doesn't mean it had a brain.  Were
> you there?  Have you seen actual autopsy reports?

I'll testify for the defense at your murderer's trial that you were
already brain dead. I'll use the sentence above as proof.

> >and says, "This baby is big enough to walk around with me or
> >walk me to the bus stop.’”?
>
> You think it's criminal to have a bad taste in jokes?

It's criminal to murder. It's a sick, liberal motherfucker that makes
jokes about it.

> >Of course this is rhetorical question. You've long-ago marginalized
> >yourself as racist-ghoul, liberal-crackpot that runs to the defense of
> >a doctor who's facing 7 counts of 1st degree and 1 count of 3rd degree
> >murder.
>
> Bullshit
>
> >> before birth instead of after.
>
> >Maybe Eileen can explain child birth to you?:
>
> >“After the baby was expelled, Cross noticed that he was breathing,
> >though not for long."
>
> My first born lived 10 days.  Had she lived longer, she would have
> been -severely- brain damaged.  I've been there - you haven't

Oh? My brother lived 6 months. Did you and Eileen love your baby or
would you rather Dr. Gosnell was your OB/GYN?

> >> Gory pictures there, but not nearly as gory as Sandy Hook.
>
> >Really? You've seen pictures of the Sandy Hook masacre?
>
> I've read descriptions.
>
> >I hear Sicko
> >fuck Michael Moore is eager for some new porn. This could be you "in"
> >with the slobby fat man if you show him your pictures.
>
> You seem eager to show pictures of aborted fetuses, yet reluctant to show
> pictures of the results of gun violence - why is that?

I wish the article didn't have the picture.

[1,926 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Scott Roeder needs a weekend pass...

[1,926 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:08:42 -0700, "Baxter"
<baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

>"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:cb58c916-4be2-4a9c...@h1g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...
>> "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
>> Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
>> http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-walk-around-me-or-walk-me-bus-stop
>
>Liberal?! Nothing there about him being Liberal. Nothing there but
>conservative umbrage about "killing babies" before birth instead of after.
>Gory pictures there, but not nearly as gory as Sandy Hook.

Mass murderer Lanza used a gun in his crimes.

Mass murderer Gosnell used scissors. (and has killed far more
innocents than Lanza)

Ignoring the obvious common factor, moonbat liberals see only the gun
and go ape shit against the Constitution and law abiding citizens.

As it always has been.

[Moder@tor]

On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:50:12 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Mar 21, 3:08�pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> -
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�---------
>> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks �www.baxcode.com
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�---------
>>
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:cb58c916-4be2-4a9c...@h1g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
>> > Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
>> >http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-wal...
>>
>> Liberal?! �Nothing there about him being Liberal.
>
>You can count the number of conservative, black, pro-late-abortion
>advocates on no fingers.

Gee, with the same number of fingers you can count your IQ.

[ASt...@elgereth.com]

On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:58:47 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>"Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
>Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
>http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-walk-around-me-or-walk-me-bus-stop

It was a conservative administration that ended the regular inspections of
abortion clinics, Mr. Al. Just ask former governor, Tom Ridge. But partisanship
and opinion about abortion aside, this monster should be in jail.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:2a0ce89b-1906-4e3e...@kw7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 21, 6:56 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> >You can count the number of conservative, black, pro-late-abortion
>> >advocates on no fingers.
>>
>> And if he's just in to it for the money?
>
>As opposed to believing he's providing a vital service to women?

Certainly conservatives aren't about providing a vital services to women.

>Murdering babies without the rationalization "choice"? You are
>imagining an even sicker motherfucker?

You holler about the Constitution and rights, but you've pre-judged this man
simply because he provides "abortion". You would deny him his Civil and
Constitutional rights if you could. Fact is, the only part of the
Constitution you care about is the 2nd Amendment - and perhaps those parts
that count blacks and indians as less than a person.

[ASt...@elgereth.com]

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:13:23 -0700, "Baxter" <baxter.s...@baxcode.com>
wrote:

Actually, Mr. Baxter, I believe that Mr. Al is hollering about this doctor being
a Liberal. At least that is my take on it. SCOTUS has ruled abortion legal, and
Mr. Al can holler all he wants about that, it will fall on deaf ears.

Make no mistake, this so called 'doctor' was guilty of a lot of malpractices,
that would have been caught sooner had conservatives not ended regular
inspection of abortion clinics in that state. It seems extremely hypocritical of
Mr. Al to bash the guy for being a Liberal, and a black when he was actually
just an extremely terrible doctor who was allowed to practice further because of
a lack of inspection of abortion clinics due to conservative policy in that
state.

[Sancho Panza]

Dropped under pressure to ease barriers for women seeking abortions,
according to your cited report, raising the added curiously interesting
question of why Rendell did not reinstate the inspections:

"With the change of administration from Governor Casey to Governor
Ridge, officials concluded that inspections would be �putting a barrier
up to women� seeking abortions.

�Even nail salons in Pennsylvania are monitored more closely for client
safety,� the report states. �Without regular inspections, providers like
Gosnell continue to operate; unlawful and dangerous third-trimester
abortions go undetected; and many women, especially poor women, suffer.�

According to the report, the policy change occurred after 1993 when
attorneys under the administration of then-governor Tom Ridge
�interpreted the same regulations that had permitted annual inspections
for years to no longer authorize those inspections.� Thereafter, only
inspections triggered by complaints were authorized. The report noted
that Department of Public Health officials reinstituted regular
inspections of abortion clinics in February 2010. Ed Rendell, the
Pennsylvania Democrat whose second term as governor ended last week,
released a statement saying he was �flabbergasted� when he learned of
the department�s lax scrutiny of abortion clinics and immediately
ordered increased inspections, the Associated Press reported.

Still, the earlier policy had its defenders. According to the grand jury
report, when the Department of Health�s chief lawyer was asked about it,
she responded, �People die.�

Given that between 30,000 to 40,000 abortions are performed each year
Pennsylvania, it�s unclear how many women have been put at risk in the
almost two decades that regulators suspended regular inspections of
abortion clinics in Pennsylvania. The grand jury report does note that
many organizations perform safe abortion procedures and have high
standards of care, but that�s �no thanks to the Pennsylvania Department
of Health.� "

[ASt...@elgereth.com]

On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:59:45 -0400, Sancho Panza <otter...@xhotmail.com>
wrote:

Must be the cite from another. I have provided none in this thread, Mr. Panza.
But what you write within is true in that Tom Ridge, the GOP governor, ended
regular inspections, whether under pressure or not. What is the old addage?
Can't stand the heat? Seems as the governor, he had the ultimate say and caved.
Where does the buck stop?

>
>"With the change of administration from Governor Casey to Governor

>Ridge, officials concluded that inspections would be �putting a barrier
>up to women� seeking abortions.
>
>�Even nail salons in Pennsylvania are monitored more closely for client
>safety,� the report states. �Without regular inspections, providers like

>Gosnell continue to operate; unlawful and dangerous third-trimester

>abortions go undetected; and many women, especially poor women, suffer.�

>
>According to the report, the policy change occurred after 1993 when
>attorneys under the administration of then-governor Tom Ridge

>�interpreted the same regulations that had permitted annual inspections
>for years to no longer authorize those inspections.� Thereafter, only

>inspections triggered by complaints were authorized. The report noted
>that Department of Public Health officials reinstituted regular
>inspections of abortion clinics in February 2010. Ed Rendell, the
>Pennsylvania Democrat whose second term as governor ended last week,

>released a statement saying he was �flabbergasted� when he learned of
>the department�s lax scrutiny of abortion clinics and immediately

>ordered increased inspections, the Associated Press reported.

It sounds like a bipartisan effort to eliminate inspections. How could Rendell
possibly have not known that Ridge had eliminated them? If he didn't know, he
should be thrown out of office.

>Still, the earlier policy had its defenders. According to the grand jury

>report, when the Department of Health�s chief lawyer was asked about it,
>she responded, �People die.�

>
>Given that between 30,000 to 40,000 abortions are performed each year

>Pennsylvania, it�s unclear how many women have been put at risk in the

>almost two decades that regulators suspended regular inspections of
>abortion clinics in Pennsylvania. The grand jury report does note that
>many organizations perform safe abortion procedures and have high

>standards of care, but that�s �no thanks to the Pennsylvania Department
>of Health.� "

It's all too easy to blame the person who originally eliminated the regular
inspections, Tom Ridge. And he should rightly be blamed. But following that
stupidity up with the continued policy of keeping them suspended through
subsequent administrations was equally as lame. Almost sounds like they
(governors Ridge and Rendell) were being paid by the clinics to turn their
backs.

[Sancho Panza]

You are correct. It was the cns.com cite in the first post in this
thread. Thank you.

[Chuck]

Yer Pal Al wrote:
> "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
> Walk Me to the Bus Stop'

The best way to deal with those who support abortion is too shot them
while they're attending Church, like they did with Dr. Keller. Or,
be a real anti abortion American hero like Eric Robert Rudolph.

The Centennial Olympic Park Bombing was a terrorist bombing on July
27, 1996 in Atlanta, Georgia, United States during the 1996 Summer
Olympics, the first of four committed by Eric Robert Rudolph. Two
people died, and 111 were injured.

And once we tax the shit out of the people to fund the welfare of the
unborn we've saved, things will be perfect.

[Billy]

In article <kig0d6$uor$1...@speranza.aioe.org>,
"Baxter" <baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

> -
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> ------
> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cb58c916-4be2-4a9c...@h1g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...
> > "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
> > Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
> > http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-walk-aroun
> > d-me-or-walk-me-bus-stop
>
> Liberal?! Nothing there about him being Liberal. Nothing there but
> conservative umbrage about "killing babies" before birth instead of after.
> Gory pictures there, but not nearly as gory as Sandy Hook.

Or the Oklahoma City's Federal Building's day-care center,
or the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham,
Alabama, on Sunday, September 15, 1963

--
Welcome to the New America.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA736oK9FPg>
or
E Pluribus Unum
Next time vote Green Party

[Sanders Kaufman]

"Chuck" wrote in message
news:4952d532-5d43-4ab9...@g4g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

> The best way to deal with those who support abortion is too shot them

The problem with that solution is that you're too cowardly to carry it out.
Sure, you talk a good game - but it's all talk.

[Weisskopf]

He sure did nail it about having to raise taxes to support you people
who should have been aborted. If your mama could have found your daddy
she would have sued him to pay for your abortion.

[Sanders Kaufman]

"Weisskopf" wrote in message news:kj61rt$fk8$2...@wieslauf.sub.de...

>On 3/29/2013 3:32 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote:

>> The problem with that solution is that you're too cowardly to carry it
>> out.
<> Sure, you talk a good game - but it's all talk.

>He sure did nail it about having to raise taxes to support you people

No, he just demanded others fight his fight for him.
It's the Republican way.

[1,929 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

But that's the only problem with that solution, eh?

[The Traveler]

I almost forgot you are a Communist.

[1,929 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

The communists wish they could forget him, too.

[Yer Pal Al]

On Mar 21, 6:56 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>

> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:6504cea6-f2b9-4b55...@qo9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On Mar 21, 3:08 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

> >> messagenews:cb58c916-4be2-4a9c-ab7d->00f3e8acb__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@h1g2000pbg.googlegroups.com...

>
> >> > "Abortionist Joked: 'This Baby Is Big Enough to Walk Around With Me or
> >> > Walk Me to the Bus Stop' "
> >> >http://cnsnews.com/news/article/abortionist-joked-baby-big-enough-wal...
>
> >> Liberal?! Nothing there about him being Liberal.
>
> >You can count the number of conservative, black, pro-late-abortion
> >advocates on no fingers.
>
> And if he's just in to it for the money?
>
> >> Nothing there but
> >> conservative umbrage about "killing babies"
>
> >You don't take umbrage at a doctor who severes the spines of breathing
> >babies
>
> Just because it was allegedly breathing, doesn't mean it had a brain.  Were
> you there?  Have you seen actual autopsy reports?

Liberal scum off the streets:
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-first-degree-murder-191903698.html

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:c7652463-5a59-4eff...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>Liberal scum off the streets:
>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-first-degree-murder-191903698.html

Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the anti-abortion
crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an alternative.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 13, 1:32 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:c7652463-5a59-4eff...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>
> >Liberal scum off the streets:

> >http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-...

>
> Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the anti-abortion
> crowd.  No woman would have gone to him had there been an alternative.

Kermit Gosnell would never existed if liberals were taught, and
understood, what human life is.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4f91ae4a-3b87-4eea...@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...

On May 13, 1:32 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

>> messagenews:c7652463-5a59-4eff-8bda->f0a884...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>>
>> >Liberal scum off the streets:
>> >http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-...
>>
>> Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the
>> anti-abortion
>> crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an alternative.
>
>Kermit Gosnell would never existed if liberals were taught, and
>understood, what human life is.

Liberals know better than you what human life is. You'd know that if you
had been taught and understood what a liberal actually was.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 13, 3:10 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>

> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:4f91ae4a-3b87-4eea...@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...

> On May 13, 1:32 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

> >> messagenews:c7652463-5a59-4eff-8bda->f0a884ca1__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>
> >> >Liberal scum off the streets:
> >> >http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-...
>
> >> Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the
> >> anti-abortion
> >> crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an alternative.
>
> >Kermit Gosnell would never existed if liberals were taught, and
> >understood, what human life is.
>
> Liberals know better than you what human life is.

So says the ghoul that is defending and apologizing for a monster that
was convicted of murdering 3 babies.

> You'd know that if you
> had been taught and understood what a liberal actually was.

Someone who doesn't value life, someone who believes in a governmental
moral authority and the belief that other's freedoms are
inconsequential.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:70404603-831d-4eb6...@fz1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 13, 3:10 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> Liberals know better than you what human life is.
>
>So says the ghoul that is defending and apologizing for a monster that
>was convicted of murdering 3 babies.

Where did I defend him? It's you righturds who created him.

>> You'd know that if you
>> had been taught and understood what a liberal actually was.
>
>Someone who doesn't value life,

Mother Nature does not "value life" - she routinely aborts probably 80% of
fertilized eggs

>someone who believes in a governmental
>moral authority

Why should governments be involved in morality?

>and the belief that other's freedoms are
>inconsequential.

You don't believe that women are people capable of making their own
decisions about their bodies? You would enslave women while talking about
"freedom". That's -her- body, not yours.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 13, 5:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:70404603-831d-4eb6...@fz1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On May 13, 3:10 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Liberals know better than you what human life is.
>
> >So says the ghoul that is defending and apologizing for a monster that
> >was convicted of murdering 3 babies.
>
> Where did I defend him?  It's you righturds who created him.

"And if he's just in to it for the money?"

"Just because it was allegedly breathing, doesn't mean it had a
brain. Were
you there? Have you seen actual autopsy reports?"

"You think it's criminal to have a bad taste in jokes?"

"Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the anti-
abortion
crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an
alternative."

> >> You'd know that if you
> >> had been taught and understood what a liberal actually was.
>
> >Someone who doesn't value life,
>
> Mother Nature does not "value life" - she routinely aborts probably 80% of
> fertilized eggs

You are the one who gives a shit about 3 murdered babies. And then you
morph into some inalienable right rant that you will never, ever
understand.

> >someone who believes in a governmental
> >moral authority
>
> Why should governments be involved in morality?

I like having laws against murder and other crimes. With the
government as a morality authority it's only a crime if the majority
says so.

> >and the belief that other's freedoms are
> >inconsequential.
>
> You don't believe that women are people capable of making their own
> decisions about their bodies?

I believe that if the government allowed the abortion of 2+ month old
babies like Princeton Dean Peter Singer suggests that some women would
chose to have those abortions. I believe that if you told a woman that
a human being was actually part of their body women will kill human
beings as a matter of convenience. I know that some women who have had
abortions now believe that they killed a human being.

> You would enslave women while talking about
> "freedom".  That's -her- body, not yours.

If a woman gets pregnant and doesn't want to have the baby she has at
least couple of months to terminate that pregnancy without killing a
human being. I don't believe anyone has the right to kill a human
being.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:ab2705f5-1526-49c9...@mq5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 13, 5:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> Where did I defend him? It's you righturds who created him.
>
>"And if he's just in to it for the money?"
>
>"Just because it was allegedly breathing, doesn't mean it had a
>brain. Were
>you there? Have you seen actual autopsy reports?"
>
>"You think it's criminal to have a bad taste in jokes?"
>
>"Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the anti-
>abortion
>crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an
>alternative."

None of those are a defense of Gosnell.

>> >someone who believes in a governmental
>> >moral authority
>>
>> Why should governments be involved in morality?
>
>I like having laws against murder and other crimes. With the
>government as a morality authority it's only a crime if the majority
>says so.

Do you believe a person has the right to kill an intruder in his home>

[1,966 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Barring the possibility of inflicting upon Gosnell the suffering of
each and every victim he murdered, how about we just get a big pair of
scissors and snip his spinal cord?

Or he could be forced to share a prison cell with Scott Roeder.
Gosnell would be afraid to ever sleep again...

[1,966 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:32:32 -0700, "Baxter"
<baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

>"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:c7652463-5a59-4eff...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>
>>Liberal scum off the streets:
>>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-first-degree-murder-191903698.html
>
>Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the anti-abortion
>crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an alternative.

Your continued defense of mass murder is so... progressive.

[1,966 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:10:58 -0700, "Baxter"
<baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

>"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4f91ae4a-3b87-4eea...@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...
>On May 13, 1:32 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> messagenews:c7652463-5a59-4eff-8bda->f0a884...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> >Liberal scum off the streets:
>>> >http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-...
>>>
>>> Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the
>>> anti-abortion
>>> crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an alternative.
>>
>>Kermit Gosnell would never existed if liberals were taught, and
>>understood, what human life is.
>
>Liberals know better than you what human life is. You'd know that if you
>had been taught and understood what a liberal actually was.

Today's liberal is death-worshipping scum.

As they sow, so shall they reap.

[1,966 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:15:48 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On May 13, 3:10 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:4f91ae4a-3b87-4eea...@d8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com...
>> On May 13, 1:32 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> messagenews:c7652463-5a59-4eff-8bda->f0a884ca1__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> >Liberal scum off the streets:
>> >> >http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-...
>>
>> >> Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the
>> >> anti-abortion
>> >> crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an alternative.
>>
>> >Kermit Gosnell would never existed if liberals were taught, and
>> >understood, what human life is.
>>
>> Liberals know better than you what human life is.
>
>So says the ghoul that is defending and apologizing for a monster that
>was convicted of murdering 3 babies.

At least another Mengele acolyte is headed for hell.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"1,966 murdered in Obama's organized communities"
<Ambassad...@whitehouse.gov> wrote in message
news:paj3p8lvkk84eie3u...@4ax.com...

That's not a defense - it's a condemnation of his creators.

[1,966 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:42:54 -0700, "Baxter"
<baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

>"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:70404603-831d-4eb6...@fz1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>On May 13, 3:10 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Liberals know better than you what human life is.
>>
>>So says the ghoul that is defending and apologizing for a monster that
>>was convicted of murdering 3 babies.
>
>Where did I defend him? It's you righturds who created him.

No. Gosnell is wholly a creation of your liberal death cult. His
fate is yours.

>>> You'd know that if you
>>> had been taught and understood what a liberal actually was.
>>
>>Someone who doesn't value life,
>
>Mother Nature does not "value life" - she routinely aborts probably 80% of
>fertilized eggs

She sure fucked up in your case.

>>someone who believes in a governmental
>>moral authority
>
>Why should governments be involved in morality?
>
>>and the belief that other's freedoms are
>>inconsequential.
>
>You don't believe that women are people capable of making their own
>decisions about their bodies? You would enslave women while talking about
>"freedom". That's -her- body, not yours.

You worship murder in the name of convenience. Given the opportunity,
you would turn Gosnell's killing rooms into a shrine; an altar where
you would masturbate to jars filled with pieces of murdered humans.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 13, 7:29 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:ab2705f5-1526-49c9...@mq5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On May 13, 5:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Where did I defend him? It's you righturds who created him.
>
> >"And if he's just in to it for the money?"
>
> >"Just because it was allegedly breathing, doesn't mean it had a
> >brain.  Were
> >you there?  Have you seen actual autopsy reports?"
>
> >"You think it's criminal to have a bad taste in jokes?"
>
> >"Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the anti-
> >abortion
> >crowd.  No woman would have gone to him had there been an
> >alternative."
>
> None of those are a defense of Gosnell.

All of these are deflections away from the evil that he's done. You're
an insane Gosnell apologist. You'd've loved for him to be declared
innocent.

> >> >someone who believes in a governmental
> >> >moral authority
>
> >> Why should governments be involved in morality?
>
> >I like having laws against murder and other crimes. With the
> >government as a morality authority it's only a crime if the majority
> >says so.
>
> Do you believe a person has the right to kill an intruder in his home>

That depends. Is the "intruder" a small child? Is that "intruder"
someone who has been living in your house for a month or two already?
Does the "intruder" have malice to do you harm?

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:e2f6d164-43a7-4b1c...@wg15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 13, 7:29 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> None of those are a defense of Gosnell.
>
>All of these are deflections away from the evil that he's done. You're
>an insane Gosnell apologist. You'd've loved for him to be declared
>innocent.

Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement. You decided that
he was guilty as soon as you heard the term "abortion".

>>
>> Do you believe a person has the right to kill an intruder in his home>
>
>That depends. Is the "intruder" a small child? Is that "intruder"
>someone who has been living in your house for a month or two already?
>Does the "intruder" have malice to do you harm?

So you're giving up your right to defend your home against intruders? That
if someone meets certain criteria, that you have to let them take up
residence in your house and eat your food all against your will? Why then
the Third Amendment?

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:e2f6d164-43a7-4b1c...@wg15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On May 13, 7:29 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> None of those are a defense of Gosnell.
>
> >All of these are deflections away from the evil that he's done. You're
> >an insane Gosnell apologist. You'd've loved for him to be declared
> >innocent.
>
> Bullshit!  They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.

I judged the case on what had been testified.

> You decided that
> he was guilty as soon as you heard the term "abortion".

He murdered babies after they were born alive. 99.99% us know this to
be murder and the .01%'ers like you start making excuses like: Maybe
the baby didn't have "a brain." As if that would be a legitimate
excuse for murdering the likes of you.

> >> Do you believe a person has the right to kill an intruder in his home>
>
> >That depends. Is the "intruder" a small child? Is that "intruder"
> >someone who has been living in your house for a month or two already?
> >Does the "intruder" have malice to do you harm?
>
> So you're giving up your right to defend your home against intruders?

Did I say that? I've excluded some people who I would not kill.

> That
> if someone meets certain criteria, that you have to let them take up
> residence in your house and eat your food all against your will?

If I've invited them in and they've been living with me I can't then
arbitrarily declare them an intruder and murder them.

> Why then
> the Third Amendment?

You were talking about the military in an abortion debate? Focus much?
You're what? Dreaming of the day we live in a military state where the
military chooses not to occupy the "biggest home on the [Detroit Ave]
block" and decides to set up shop at my place?

I, and my wealth, will be long gone before your liberal/fascist dreams
come true.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.
>
>I judged the case on what had been testified.

Bullshit! You concemnded Gosnell as soon as you heard media reports and
long before he went to trial.

>>
>> So you're giving up your right to defend your home against intruders?
>
>Did I say that? I've excluded some people who I would not kill.

List them - specify your criteria.

>> That
>> if someone meets certain criteria, that you have to let them take up
>> residence in your house and eat your food all against your will?
>
>If I've invited them in and they've been living with me I can't then
>arbitrarily declare them an intruder and murder them.

So you think if a woman has sex she's inviting a fetus? Even if she was
raped?

>> Why then
>> the Third Amendment?
>
>You were talking about the military in an abortion debate? Focus much?
>You're what? Dreaming of the day we live in a military state where the
>military chooses not to occupy the "biggest home on the [Detroit Ave]
>block" and decides to set up shop at my place?

You see no parallels between forcing you to quarter unwanted troops and
forcing a woman to carry an unwanted fetus?

>I, and my wealth, will be long gone before your liberal/fascist dreams
>come true.

Those are your dreams - and they have, nor will have, any reality.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 14, 12:54 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.
>
> >I judged the case on what had been testified.
>
> Bullshit!  You concemnded Gosnell as soon as you heard media reports and
> long before he went to trial.

I originally posted on this case in October of 2011 when the grand
jury reported their findings. We can pretend that I judged him too
quickly if you like. It doesn't change a thing. He is a guilty
murderer and a scum liberal and you defended your ideological brother.
Like always, I was right and you were wrong.

> >> So you're giving up your right to defend your home against intruders?
>
> >Did I say that? I've excluded some people who I would not kill.
>
> List them - specify your criteria.
>
> >> That
> >> if someone meets certain criteria, that you have to let them take up
> >> residence in your house and eat your food all against your will?
>
> >If I've invited them in and they've been living with me I can't then
> >arbitrarily declare them an intruder and murder them.
>
> So you think if a woman has sex she's inviting a fetus?  Even if she was
> raped?
>
> >> Why then
> >> the Third Amendment?
>
> >You were talking about the military in an abortion debate? Focus much?
> >You're what? Dreaming of the day we live in a military state where the
> >military chooses not to occupy the "biggest home on the [Detroit Ave]
> >block" and decides to set up shop at my place?
>
> You see no parallels between forcing you to quarter unwanted troops and
> forcing a woman to carry an unwanted fetus?

Less than the parallels between your head and a block of wood.

> >I, and my wealth, will be long gone before your liberal/fascist dreams
> >come true.
>
> Those are your dreams - and they have, nor will have, any reality.

Why don't you run your 3rd amendment defense past the Gosnell lawyers.
You need a reality check.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:12b76102-8129-4e2d...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>On May 14, 12:54 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

>> messagenews:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b-9565->ade3dc...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>> On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> >> Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.
>>
>> >I judged the case on what had been testified.
>>
>> Bullshit! You concemnded Gosnell as soon as you heard media reports and
>> long before he went to trial.
>
>I originally posted on this case in October of 2011 when the grand
>jury reported their findings. We can pretend that I judged him too
>quickly if you like. It doesn't change a thing. He is a guilty

IOW, you're guilty as charged.

>murderer and a scum liberal and you defended your ideological brother.

You have no proof he was a liberal. Much more likely he was a capitalist
feeding off the misery of others

>Like always, I was right and you were wrong.

You're like an addict. You anti-abortionists still created him.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 14, 9:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>

> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:12b76102-8129-4e2d...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>
> >On May 14, 12:54 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

> >> messagenews:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b-9565->ade3dc8f1__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> >> On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.
>
> >> >I judged the case on what had been testified.
>
> >> Bullshit! You concemnded Gosnell as soon as you heard media reports and
> >> long before he went to trial.
>
> >I originally posted on this case in October of 2011 when the grand
> >jury reported their findings. We can pretend that I judged him too
> >quickly if you like. It doesn't change a thing. He is a guilty
>
> IOW, you're guilty as charged.
>
> >murderer and a scum liberal and you defended your ideological brother.
>
> You have no proof he was a liberal.

In your world he's a black, pro-late-term abortion conservative?

> Much more likely he was a capitalist
> feeding off the misery of others

You keep pretending to forget that liberals are hypocrites - like Al
Gore selling out to Al Jazeera and Bill Clinton abusing women.

> >Like always, I was right and you were wrong.
>
> You're like an addict.  You anti-abortionists still created him.

That's not going to stick. Liberals gave him the legal right to
practice, he got government money and those government agencies that
had oversight looked the other way - much the way you want to:
http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/01/23/kermit-gosnells-pro-choice-enablers-how-clinics-become-death-t/

[Moder@tor]

On Tue, 14 May 2013 22:39:57 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On May 14, 9:42�pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> -
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks �www.baxcode.com
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>>
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:12b76102-8129-4e2d...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >On May 14, 12:54 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> >> messagenews:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b-9565->ade3dc8f1__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>> >> On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.
>>
>> >> >I judged the case on what had been testified.
>>
>> >> Bullshit! You concemnded Gosnell as soon as you heard media reports and
>> >> long before he went to trial.
>>
>> >I originally posted on this case in October of 2011 when the grand
>> >jury reported their findings. We can pretend that I judged him too
>> >quickly if you like. It doesn't change a thing. He is a guilty
>>
>> IOW, you're guilty as charged.
>>
>> >murderer and a scum liberal and you defended your ideological brother.
>>
>> You have no proof he was a liberal.
>
>In your world he's a black, pro-late-term abortion conservative?

Nice try at spin, Al. So you have no proof he is a Liberal. Duly noted. And
throwing in the race card isn't proof. Watching you and Bax go at each other is
like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.

[1,969 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

It was right in this case:

http://www.king5.com/news/crime/Intruder-stabbed-killed-by-homeowner-in-North-Bend-207184751.html

(But now we'll have to ban knives...)

[1,969 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Tue, 14 May 2013 07:02:44 -0700, "Baxter"
<baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

>"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:e2f6d164-43a7-4b1c...@wg15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>On May 13, 7:29 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> None of those are a defense of Gosnell.
>>
>>All of these are deflections away from the evil that he's done. You're
>>an insane Gosnell apologist. You'd've loved for him to be declared
>>innocent.
>
>Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement. You decided that
>he was guilty as soon as you heard the term "abortion".

Right. The mountains of hideous evidence had ~nothing~ to do with it.

>>> Do you believe a person has the right to kill an intruder in his home>
>>
>>That depends. Is the "intruder" a small child? Is that "intruder"
>>someone who has been living in your house for a month or two already?
>>Does the "intruder" have malice to do you harm?
>
>So you're giving up your right to defend your home against intruders? That
>if someone meets certain criteria, that you have to let them take up
>residence in your house and eat your food all against your will? Why then
>the Third Amendment?

Someone is tainting your weed.

[1,969 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Tue, 14 May 2013 21:42:23 -0700, "Baxter"
<baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

>You anti-abortionists still created him.

Baby killers don't do well in prison.

Special privileges to the inmate that comes up with the most creative
way to fuck him up.

[1,969 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:45:21 -0700, "Baxter"
<baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

>"1,966 murdered in Obama's organized communities"
><Ambassad...@whitehouse.gov> wrote in message
>news:paj3p8lvkk84eie3u...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:32:32 -0700, "Baxter"
>> <baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:c7652463-5a59-4eff...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>>Liberal scum off the streets:
>>>>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/jury-finds-kermit-gosnell-guilty-first-degree-murder-191903698.html
>>>
>>>Kermit Gosnell would have never existed if it weren't for the
>>>anti-abortion
>>>crowd. No woman would have gone to him had there been an alternative.
>>
>> Your continued defense of mass murder is so... progressive.
>
>That's not a defense - it's a condemnation of his creators.

You are indeed condemned.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:0cb35e6d-8b46-4585...@mq5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 14, 9:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> You have no proof he was a liberal.
>
>In your world he's a black, pro-late-term abortion conservative?

Neither you nor I have any data on his political leanings.

>> Much more likely he was a capitalist
>> feeding off the misery of others
>
>You keep pretending to forget that liberals are hypocrites -

Hypocracy knows no boundries - you are a prime example of that

>>like Al
>>Gore selling out to Al Jazeera and Bill Clinton abusing women.
>
>> >Like always, I was right and you were wrong.
>>
>> You're like an addict. You anti-abortionists still created him.
>
>That's not going to stick.

Like any addict, you're unwilling to acknowledge you have a problem.

>Liberals gave him the legal right to
>practice,

I assume you're talking Roe v Wade - and you'd be wrong (again).
==========
In conclusion, Roe v. Wade was a bipartisan decision made by a conservative
leaning court. The seven Justices who made the majority decision were made
up of liberals, conservatives, and independents. Even the two Justices who
dissented were also divided politically, one was a liberal, the other a
conservative. The decision is representative of what conservatives say they
believe about government, that it should stay out of our lives. If
conservatives truly believe that the Constitution was written to keep the
government out of our lives, they should support this decision without
question.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/12/10/roe-v-wade-an-american-decision-for-freedom-and-liberty/
====

See, you're a hypocrite and religious fanatic - not a conservative that
believes in limited government.

>>he got government money and those government agencies that
>>had oversight looked the other way - much the way you want to:
>>http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/01/23/kermit-gosnells-pro-choice-enablers-how-clinics-become-death-t/

irrelevant

[Sancho Panza]

On 5/15/2013 10:07 AM, Baxter wrote:
> -
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0cb35e6d-8b46-4585...@mq5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
> On May 14, 9:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You have no proof he was a liberal.
>>
>> In your world he's a black, pro-late-term abortion conservative?
>
> Neither you nor I have any data on his political leanings.

Don't worry about that. We don't need it. It is widely accepted common
knowledge that vast majority of abortionists are right wingers. There,
now you're satisfied.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:51939c61$0$25611$607e...@cv.net...

"Common knowledge"?! Riiight.

What's common knowledge is that you rightards will fabricate "evidence" to
support your agenda.

"The email as published by Karl differs significantly from the original
obtained by Tapper."
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/who_doctored_a_white_house_email/

[Sancho Panza]

Somebody here is as stupidly mixed up as Steny Hoyer. The White House,
Karl and Tapper have nothing to do with the crazed abortionist Gosnell.
Just can't take that scandal fatigue, eh?

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:5193c456$0$25645$607e...@cv.net...

Manufactured "scandals". Only you rightards think there's anything of
substance to those "scandals". And when the rightard bullshit doesn't fly,
they make things up - same holds true in the Gosnell situation. Again - no
woman would have gone to him if they had had an alternative abortion
provider.

[Sancho Panza]

Gosnell was found guilty of murder by a liberal Philadelphia jury in a
liberal Philadelphia court. No conservatives were involved at all. No
conservative had to "manufacture" anything there or in any of the
Washington scandals. The Obama administration has accomplished all that
on its very own, without the least bit of outside help. Except of course
for Al Qaeda.

[Sancho Panza]

On 5/13/2013 10:29 PM, Baxter wrote:

>> "Just because it was allegedly breathing, doesn't mean it had a
>> brain.

Confirmation direct from the horse's ---.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:5193c6b7$0$25606$607e...@cv.net...

>>
> Gosnell was found guilty of murder by a liberal Philadelphia jury in a
> liberal Philadelphia court. No conservatives were involved at all.

Bullshit! Nothing but bullshit.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:5193cd29$0$25599$607e...@cv.net...

That you think any woman would want a late-term abortion for anything other
than the most dire reasons shows that you are the one lacking a brain.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 14, 11:47 pm, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 22:39:57 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 14, 9:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> -
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> >> Free Software - Baxter Codeworkswww.baxcode.com

> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:12b76102-8129-4e2d...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >On May 14, 12:54 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

> >> >> messagenews:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b-9565->ade3dc8f1__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> >> >> On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.
>
> >> >> >I judged the case on what had been testified.
>
> >> >> Bullshit! You concemnded Gosnell as soon as you heard media reports and
> >> >> long before he went to trial.
>
> >> >I originally posted on this case in October of 2011 when the grand
> >> >jury reported their findings. We can pretend that I judged him too
> >> >quickly if you like. It doesn't change a thing. He is a guilty
>
> >> IOW, you're guilty as charged.
>
> >> >murderer and a scum liberal and you defended your ideological brother.
>
> >> You have no proof he was a liberal.
>
> >In your world he's a black, pro-late-term abortion conservative?
>
> Nice try at spin, Al. So you have no proof he is a Liberal. Duly noted. And
> throwing in the race card isn't proof.

We could put money on who he voted for president - if you aren't a
fucking pussy coward that is.

> Watching you and Bax go at each other is
> like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.

Thanks for inviting yourself in you fucking ass-sniffing pervert.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 15, 7:07 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:0cb35e6d-8b46-4585...@mq5g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> On May 14, 9:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> You have no proof he was a liberal.
>
> >In your world he's a black, pro-late-term abortion conservative?
>
> Neither you nor I have any data on his political leanings.

Let's put money on who he voted for or you can chicken-shit your way
out.

> >> Much more likely he was a capitalist
> >> feeding off the misery of others
>
> >You keep pretending to forget that liberals are hypocrites -
>
> Hypocracy knows no boundries  - you are a prime example of that
>
> >>like Al
> >>Gore selling out to Al Jazeera and Bill Clinton abusing women.
>
> >> >Like always, I was right and you were wrong.
>
> >> You're like an addict. You anti-abortionists still created him.
>
> >That's not going to stick.
>
> Like any addict, you're unwilling to acknowledge you have a problem.
>
> >Liberals gave him the legal right to
> >practice,
>
> I assume you're talking Roe v Wade - and you'd be wrong (again).

You should read about the trimester framework of Roe. Since then there
have been many changes to the laws. It's funny that you want to think
of pro-abortion as being a conservative issue. Get a clue.

> ==========
> In conclusion, Roe v. Wade was a bipartisan decision made by a conservative
> leaning court. The seven Justices who made the majority decision were made
> up of liberals, conservatives, and independents. Even the two Justices who
> dissented were also divided politically, one was a liberal, the other a
> conservative. The decision is representative of what conservatives say they
> believe about government, that it should stay out of our lives. If
> conservatives truly believe that the Constitution was written to keep the
> government out of our lives, they should support this decision without
> question.
>

> http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/12/10/roe-v-wade-an-american-decisi...

> ====
>
> See,  you're a hypocrite and religious fanatic - not a conservative that
> believes in limited government.

I'm religious fanatic? That's an interesting conclusion. I'm sure you
go to church as much, if not more than I.

> >>he got government money and those government agencies that
> >>had oversight looked the other way - much the way you want to:

> >>http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/01/23/kermit-gosnells-pro-choice-en...
>
> irrelevant

Run away little girl. Government allowed him to operate.

[Sancho Panza]

So you call three counts of murder bullshit. How many counts do you need?

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:51981474-4e58-4a06...@fq2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 15, 7:07 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> Neither you nor I have any data on his political leanings.
>
>Let's put money on who he voted for or you can chicken-shit your way
>out.

'Course you'd lose your anonymity.

>>
>> I assume you're talking Roe v Wade - and you'd be wrong (again).
>
>You should read about the trimester framework of Roe. Since then there
>have been many changes to the laws.

Mostly they've been tightened. It's harder to get an abortion now than 20
years ago

>It's funny that you want to think
>of pro-abortion as being a conservative issue. Get a clue.

You're the one lacking a clue - re-read that link:

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/12/10/roe-v-wade-an-american-decisi...

>>
>> See, you're a hypocrite and religious fanatic - not a conservative that
>> believes in limited government.
>
>I'm religious fanatic? That's an interesting conclusion. I'm sure you
>go to church as much, if not more than I.

You'd lose that bet. I'd also note one doesn't need to go to church to be
religious - and that some who go to church often are really not religious at
all.

>Run away little girl. Government allowed him to operate.

Completely in keeping with right-wing capitalistic doctrine.

[Moder@tor]

On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:55:41 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com>
wrote:

So in other words you don't know. I was right. No proof.

>
>> Watching you and Bax go at each other is
>> like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.
>
>Thanks for inviting yourself in you fucking ass-sniffing pervert.

What a loser you are. You're quickly overtaking Spammy as the biggest troll on
Usenet.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:5193ef6b$0$20197$607e...@cv.net...

Your claim of liberal jury and liberal court is bullshit.

[Sancho Panza]

Oh yeah, Philly is most definitely a well-known conservative stronghold.
Guns, Bibles, drinking -- all that.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:51941573$0$19566$607e...@cv.net...

===========
Philadelphia is the largest city in Pennsylvania, sixth-most-populous city
in the United States and the fifty-first most populous city in the world. It
typically leans toward the conservative side of politics. ChaCha!
http://tinyurl.com/be4puay

[Sancho Panza]

Yup, that's why it's such a hotbed of voting fraud. Speaking of which,
how about explaining the last four or five mayors. Let's see if you or
your dumbass source even knows who they are and just how conservative
they are. What a pure load of hooey.
\

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:51942e4d$0$19559$607e...@cv.net...

==========
He is nothing if not consistent. Just as he did two years ago, Philadelphia
Mayor Michael Nutter vetoed a bill allowing workers to earn sick days.

The bill had been amended to be more amenable to Mayor Nutter’s corporate
sensibilities. It would allow workers to earn one hour of sick leave for
every 40 hours worked. It would also exempt small businesses with up to five
employees.

But it was still not enough. In rejecting this pro-worker measure, Nutter
repeated the same claptrap that politicians have used to oppose the minimum
wage, worker safety measures, and child labor laws throughout history.

http://stfuconservatives.tumblr.com/post/47499045999

========

Sounds absolutely conservative to me. Looks like it's you that have pulled
a load of 'liberal Philadelphia' hooey from a dumbass (or just ass?) source.

[Sancho Panza]

> The bill had been amended to be more amenable to Mayor Nutter�s corporate

> sensibilities. It would allow workers to earn one hour of sick leave for
> every 40 hours worked. It would also exempt small businesses with up to five
> employees.
>
> But it was still not enough. In rejecting this pro-worker measure, Nutter
> repeated the same claptrap that politicians have used to oppose the minimum
> wage, worker safety measures, and child labor laws throughout history.
>
> http://stfuconservatives.tumblr.com/post/47499045999
>
> ========
>
> Sounds absolutely conservative to me. Looks like it's you that have pulled
> a load of 'liberal Philadelphia' hooey from a dumbass (or just ass?) source.

Philadelphia sets the record in presidential voting:

"If you were told that in 59 different voting divisions of a major city,
Barack Obama got every single vote, every single vote, 19,605 votes, and
Mitt Romney got zero, would you think there was no voter fraud? Or would
you think that this was a mythical city, a city that Barack Obama and
his minions created out of whole cloth? Where would you find such a
ridiculous, over-the�top statistic?

Welcome to Philadelphia.

Yup, the City of Brotherly Love has claimed that in 59 of its divisions,
not one human being voted for Mitt Romney. Not 20, not 10, not 5 not 1.
Zeeeerrroooo.

And they swear that this was legit.

The neighborhoods involved were the almost exclusively black sections of
West and North Philadelphia.

There are skeptics: Steve Miskin, a spokesman for Republicans in the
Pennsylvania House of Representatives, who champions a
voter-identification initiative, said, �We believe we need to continue
ensuring the integrity of the ballot."

Larry Sabato, a nationally respected political scientist at the
University of Virginia, asserted, "Not a single vote for Romney or even
an error? That's worth looking into."

This follows 2008, when McCain got zero votes in 57 Philadelphia voting
divisions, as opposed to 2004, when George W. Bush was shut out in just
five divisions.

The obvious reason is the presence of Barack Obama."

And Nutter is just the latest in a string of the purest Democratic
mayors, preceded by John Street, Ed Rendell, Wilson Goode and Bill
Green. Not anything close to a conservative or even a moderate
Republican in that pack.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:51944366$0$20197$607e...@cv.net...

>> The bill had been amended to be more amenable to Mayor Nutter’s corporate

>> sensibilities. It would allow workers to earn one hour of sick leave for
>> every 40 hours worked. It would also exempt small businesses with up to
>> five
>> employees.
>>
>> But it was still not enough. In rejecting this pro-worker measure, Nutter
>> repeated the same claptrap that politicians have used to oppose the
>> minimum
>> wage, worker safety measures, and child labor laws throughout history.
>>
>> http://stfuconservatives.tumblr.com/post/47499045999
>>
>> ========
>>
>> Sounds absolutely conservative to me. Looks like it's you that have
>> pulled
>> a load of 'liberal Philadelphia' hooey from a dumbass (or just ass?)
>> source.
>
> Philadelphia sets the record in presidential voting:

Now you're moving the goalposts - from mayor to president

>
> "If you were told that in 59 different voting divisions of a major city,
> Barack Obama got every single vote,

Obama is NOT a liberal - he just looks like that to you rightards. In
actuality he's slightly to the right of Center. In times past (1950's,
1960's) he would have been Republican.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote in message
news:48s7p8pk3i9srk7ak...@4ax.com...

>
> What a loser you are. You're quickly overtaking Spammy as the biggest
> troll on
> Usenet.

Politics is like driving. To go backward put it in R. To go forward put it
in D.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 15, 1:34 pm, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:55:41 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 14, 11:47 pm, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 14 May 2013 22:39:57 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On May 14, 9:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> -
> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
> >> >> Free Software - Baxter Codeworkswww.baxcode.com
> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> >> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:12b76102-8129-4e2d...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> >On May 14, 12:54 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

> >> >> >> messagenews:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b-9565->ade3dc8f1__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> >> >> >> On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.
>
> >> >> >> >I judged the case on what had been testified.
>
> >> >> >> Bullshit! You concemnded Gosnell as soon as you heard media reports and
> >> >> >> long before he went to trial.
>
> >> >> >I originally posted on this case in October of 2011 when the grand
> >> >> >jury reported their findings. We can pretend that I judged him too
> >> >> >quickly if you like. It doesn't change a thing. He is a guilty
>
> >> >> IOW, you're guilty as charged.
>
> >> >> >murderer and a scum liberal and you defended your ideological brother.
>
> >> >> You have no proof he was a liberal.
>
> >> >In your world he's a black, pro-late-term abortion conservative?
>
> >> Nice try at spin, Al. So you have no proof he is a Liberal. Duly noted. And
> >> throwing in the race card isn't proof.
>
> >We could put money on who he voted for president - if you aren't a
> >fucking pussy coward that is.
>
> So in other words you don't know. I was right. No proof.

I do know. Everyone knows. You are a coward afraid to make a wager.

> >> Watching you and Bax go at each other is
> >> like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.
>
> >Thanks for inviting yourself in you fucking ass-sniffing pervert.
>
> What a loser you are. You're quickly overtaking Spammy as the biggest troll on
> Usenet.

Says the guy sniffing my farts.

[Moder@tor]

On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:46:17 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com>
wrote:

So show your cite here ---->

Make sure it states exactly who this slime voted for. Otherwise STFU.

>
>> >> Watching you and Bax go at each other is
>> >> like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.
>>
>> >Thanks for inviting yourself in you fucking ass-sniffing pervert.
>>
>> What a loser you are. You're quickly overtaking Spammy as the biggest troll on
>> Usenet.
>
>Says the guy sniffing my farts.

Troll.

[1,971 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

He probably spends more time around the edges scarfing up the dog
shit.

[1,971 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Yer squirming like a toddler with a diaper full o' shit, Bax.

>same holds true in the Gosnell situation. Again - no
>woman would have gone to him if they had had an alternative abortion
>provider.

So there are more Gosnells out there? Kill 'em all.

[1,971 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Wed, 15 May 2013 11:12:53 -0700, "Baxter"
<baxter.s...@baxcode.com> wrote:

>"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5193c6b7$0$25606$607e...@cv.net...
>>>
>> Gosnell was found guilty of murder by a liberal Philadelphia jury in a
>> liberal Philadelphia court. No conservatives were involved at all.
>
>Bullshit! Nothing but bullshit.

The loss of Gosnell has really hurt your Cult of Death, hasn't it,
Bax?

[Sancho Panza]

>>> The bill had been amended to be more amenable to Mayor Nutter�s corporate

>>> sensibilities. It would allow workers to earn one hour of sick leave for
>>> every 40 hours worked. It would also exempt small businesses with up to
>>> five
>>> employees.
>>>
>>> But it was still not enough. In rejecting this pro-worker measure, Nutter
>>> repeated the same claptrap that politicians have used to oppose the
>>> minimum
>>> wage, worker safety measures, and child labor laws throughout history.
>>>
>>> http://stfuconservatives.tumblr.com/post/47499045999
>>>
>>> ========
>>>
>>> Sounds absolutely conservative to me. Looks like it's you that have
>>> pulled
>>> a load of 'liberal Philadelphia' hooey from a dumbass (or just ass?)
>>> source.
>>
>> Philadelphia sets the record in presidential voting:
>
> Now you're moving the goalposts - from mayor to president

You set the goalpost. Seeing as how you can't remember it, here it is to
remind you of what you posted: "Your claim of liberal jury and liberal
court is bullshit," and "It typically leans toward the conservative side
of politics. ChaCha!"

>>

>> "If you were told that in 59 different voting divisions of a major city,
>> Barack Obama got every single vote,
>
> Obama is NOT a liberal - he just looks like that to you rightards. In
> actuality he's slightly to the right of Center. In times past (1950's,
> 1960's) he would have been Republican.

Republicans do not say take from the middle and upper class and give it
to the lower class.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"1,971 murdered in Obama's organized communities"
<Ambassad...@whitehouse.gov> wrote in message
news:iqa9p8dksvfqoqcm1...@4ax.com...

Ah, yes, right back to the Middle Ages. We've had abortionists with us
since before recorded history.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"1,971 murdered in Obama's organized communities"
<Ambassad...@whitehouse.gov> wrote in message

news:mva9p85st9catacsc...@4ax.com...

How will those already born kids whose only meals are breakfast and lunch at
school fare with those food program cuts that you rightards support? How
many will die because you support war and the death penalty? If there is
any Cult of Death you're a member of it.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:5194c913$0$19556$607e...@cv.net...

> On 5/15/2013 10:45 PM, Baxter wrote:
>>>
>>> Philadelphia sets the record in presidential voting:
>>
>> Now you're moving the goalposts - from mayor to president
>
> You set the goalpost. Seeing as how you can't remember it, here it is to
> remind you of what you posted: "Your claim of liberal jury and liberal
> court is bullshit," and "It typically leans toward the conservative side
> of politics. ChaCha!"

Typical rightar denial.

>>
>> Obama is NOT a liberal - he just looks like that to you rightards. In
>> actuality he's slightly to the right of Center. In times past (1950's,
>> 1960's) he would have been Republican.
>
> Republicans do not say take from the middle and upper class and give it to
> the lower class.
>

Reasonable people don't take from the poor and middle class and give to the
rich.

[Sancho Panza]

On 5/16/2013 10:12 AM, Baxter wrote:
> -
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5194c913$0$19556$607e...@cv.net...
>> On 5/15/2013 10:45 PM, Baxter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Philadelphia sets the record in presidential voting:
>>>
>>> Now you're moving the goalposts - from mayor to president
>>
>> You set the goalpost. Seeing as how you can't remember it, here it is to
>> remind you of what you posted: "Your claim of liberal jury and liberal
>> court is bullshit," and "It typically leans toward the conservative side
>> of politics. ChaCha!"
>
> Typical rightar denial.

Correct. Your own words nail you once again.

>
>>>
>>> Obama is NOT a liberal - he just looks like that to you rightards. In
>>> actuality he's slightly to the right of Center. In times past (1950's,
>>> 1960's) he would have been Republican.
>>
>> Republicans do not say take from the middle and upper class and give it to
>> the lower class.
>>
> Reasonable people don't take from the poor and middle class and give to the
> rich.

Everybody but a pure Communist like you is "unreasonable." A very
sophisticated contribution to any discussion.


>

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:5194ebbf$0$20216$607e...@cv.net...

Your labeling of me, and/or any liberal as "Communist" is bullshit and an
evasion of any actual contribution to the discussion.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 16, 1:02 am, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:46:17 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 15, 1:34 pm, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:55:41 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On May 14, 11:47 pm, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 14 May 2013 22:39:57 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On May 14, 9:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> -
> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
> >> >> >> Free Software - Baxter Codeworkswww.baxcode.com
> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> >> >> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:12b76102-8129-4e2d...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> >> >On May 14, 12:54 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

> >> >> >> >> messagenews:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b-9565->ade3dc8f1__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

> >> >> >> >> On May 14, 7:02 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> Bullshit! They're a deflection from a rush to judgement.
>
> >> >> >> >> >I judged the case on what had been testified.
>
> >> >> >> >> Bullshit! You concemnded Gosnell as soon as you heard media reports and
> >> >> >> >> long before he went to trial.
>
> >> >> >> >I originally posted on this case in October of 2011 when the grand
> >> >> >> >jury reported their findings. We can pretend that I judged him too
> >> >> >> >quickly if you like. It doesn't change a thing. He is a guilty
>
> >> >> >> IOW, you're guilty as charged.
>
> >> >> >> >murderer and a scum liberal and you defended your ideological brother.
>
> >> >> >> You have no proof he was a liberal.
>
> >> >> >In your world he's a black, pro-late-term abortion conservative?
>
> >> >> Nice try at spin, Al. So you have no proof he is a Liberal. Duly noted. And
> >> >> throwing in the race card isn't proof.
>
> >> >We could put money on who he voted for president - if you aren't a
> >> >fucking pussy coward that is.
>
> >> So in other words you don't know. I was right. No proof.
>
> >I do know. Everyone knows. You are a coward afraid to make a wager.
>
> So show your cite here ---->

"We could put money on who he voted for president - if you aren't a
fucking pussy coward that is."

To which your response was to run away. Proof that you are a coward.

> >> >> Watching you and Bax go at each other is
> >> >> like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.
>
> >> >Thanks for inviting yourself in you fucking ass-sniffing pervert.
>
> >> What a loser you are. You're quickly overtaking Spammy as the biggest troll on
> >> Usenet.
>
> >Says the guy sniffing my farts.
>
> Troll.

You must like my Mexican food.

[Sancho Panza]

You're the one who touts redistribution of assets.It must be time to
retract that, too.

[Sancho Panza]

As they say on "The Soup's" Chat Stew, "And meaty, too!"

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 16, 7:12 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>

> "Sancho Panza" <otterpo...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:5194c913$0$19556$607e...@cv.net...
>
> > On 5/15/2013 10:45 PM, Baxter wrote:
>
> >>> Philadelphia sets the record in presidential voting:
>
> >> Now you're moving the goalposts - from mayor to president
>
> > You set the goalpost. Seeing as how you can't remember it, here it is to
> > remind you of what you posted: "Your claim of liberal jury and liberal
> > court is bullshit," and "It typically leans toward the conservative side
> > of politics. ChaCha!"
>
> Typical rightar denial.

It may be a court of liberal jurists but 3/4 of America believe
abortion should be limited.

> >> Obama is NOT a liberal - he just looks like that to you rightards.  In
> >> actuality he's slightly to the right of Center.  In times past (1950's,
> >> 1960's) he would have been Republican.
>
> > Republicans do not say take from the middle and upper class and give it to
> > the lower class.
>
> Reasonable people don't take from the poor and middle class and give to the
> rich.

That is exactly what is happening under Barry Hussein: We have a
strong stock market yet doubled the number of people on food stamps
and have 1/5 children living in poverty and home ownership rates are
plummeting.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:5194f0a9$0$20215$607e...@cv.net...

So did Jesus Christ - and to a far greater degree than I.

>It must be time to retract that, too.

Are you anti-Christian?

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:e02e6cf2-7029-4eae...@a10g2000pbr.googlegroups.com...

On May 16, 7:12 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> > You set the goalpost. Seeing as how you can't remember it, here it is
>> > to
>> > remind you of what you posted: "Your claim of liberal jury and liberal
>> > court is bullshit," and "It typically leans toward the conservative
>> > side
>> > of politics. ChaCha!"
>>

>> Typical rightard denial.

>
>It may be a court of liberal jurists but 3/4 of America believe
>abortion should be limited.

And the majority of Amerians support Roe v Wade.

You're moving the goalposts - the immediate issue is Pancho's claim that
court and jury were liberal.

>>
>> Reasonable people don't take from the poor and middle class and give to
>> the
>> rich.
>
>That is exactly what is happening under Barry Hussein: We have a
>strong stock market yet doubled the number of people on food stamps
>and have 1/5 children living in poverty and home ownership rates are
>plummeting.

Your racism is showing.

[Moder@tor]

On Thu, 16 May 2013 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Nice try at spin, Al. Here is a more complete version:

>> >We could put money on who he voted for president - if you aren't a
>> >fucking pussy coward that is.
>>
>> So in other words you don't know. I was right. No proof.
>
>I do know. Everyone knows. You are a coward afraid to make a wager.

So since you know, cite, otherwise everyone will know you are just a
pathelogical liar.

>To which your response was to run away. Proof that you are a coward.
>
>> >> >> Watching you and Bax go at each other is
>> >> >> like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.
>>
>> >> >Thanks for inviting yourself in you fucking ass-sniffing pervert.
>>
>> >> What a loser you are. You're quickly overtaking Spammy as the biggest troll on
>> >> Usenet.
>>
>> >Says the guy sniffing my farts.
>>
>> Troll.
>
>You must like my Mexican food.

Troll.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 16, 8:00 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> -
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------

> Free Software - Baxter Codeworks  www.baxcode.com

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:e02e6cf2-7029-4eae...@a10g2000pbr.googlegroups.com...

> On May 16, 7:12 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> > You set the goalpost. Seeing as how you can't remember it, here it is
> >> > to
> >> > remind you of what you posted: "Your claim of liberal jury and liberal
> >> > court is bullshit," and "It typically leans toward the conservative
> >> > side
> >> > of politics. ChaCha!"
>
> >> Typical rightard denial.
>
> >It may be a court of liberal jurists but 3/4 of America believe
> >abortion should be limited.
>
> And the majority of Amerians support Roe v Wade.
>
> You're moving the goalposts - the immediate issue is Pancho's claim that
> court and jury were liberal.

I'm saying even though they were probably more liberal than average
America that even they have a low tolerance to post-birth abortion.

> >> Reasonable people don't take from the poor and middle class and give to
> >> the
> >> rich.
>
> >That is exactly what is happening under Barry Hussein: We have a
> >strong stock market yet doubled the number of people on food stamps
> >and have 1/5 children living in poverty and home ownership rates are
> >plummeting.
>
> Your racism is showing.

I didn't mention race, you did.

Again.

[Yer Pal Al]

On May 16, 8:13 am, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 16, 1:02 am, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:46:17 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On May 15, 1:34 pm, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 12:55:41 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On May 14, 11:47 pm, "Moder@tor" <Mo...@tor.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 14 May 2013 22:39:57 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >On May 14, 9:42 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> -
> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
> >> >> >> >> Free Software - Baxter Codeworkswww.baxcode.com
> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------
>
> >> >> >> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:12b76102-8129-4e2d...@tz3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> >> >> >On May 14, 12:54 pm, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in

> >> >> >> >> >> messagenews:626b8fba-cb5e-4d9b-9565->ade3dc8f1__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z...@oj8g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

You want me to show your proof of who he voted for then we'll make a
wager? You are by definition a coward.

> >I do know. Everyone knows. You are a coward afraid to make a wager.
>
> So since you know, cite, otherwise everyone will know you are just a
> pathelogical liar.

I'm just making a wager. I could be wrong, but I'm willing to bet that
Gosnell is an Obama supporter. If we were to bet as to whether you are
a pussy, a yellow-bellied, lilly-livered coward - that was settled
when you refused to put your money where your mouth is.

> >To which your response was to run away. Proof that you are a coward.
>
> >> >> >> Watching you and Bax go at each other is
> >> >> >> like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.
>
> >> >> >Thanks for inviting yourself in you fucking ass-sniffing pervert.
>
> >> >> What a loser you are. You're quickly overtaking Spammy as the biggest troll on
> >> >> Usenet.
>
> >> >Says the guy sniffing my farts.
>
> >> Troll.
>
> >You must like my Mexican food.
>
> Troll.

You love my irresistible Mexican food farts. I could put you on a
vapor trail that leads you straight to the Reagan Library. I'm having
Thai food today. You'll like that, won't you, Mr. Excited?

[Moder@tor]

On Thu, 16 May 2013 08:28:23 -0700 (PDT), Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com>
wrote:

No, I just want you to prove what you claim. The wager thang was your way of
running away from doing such. Duly noted, coward.

>
>> >I do know. Everyone knows. You are a coward afraid to make a wager.
>>
>> So since you know, cite, otherwise everyone will know you are just a
>> pathelogical liar.
>
>I'm just making a wager.

No, you made a claim. Big difference. Fact is, you have no proof and once again
live up to Your Lying Pal Al nym. Yawn.

>I could be wrong, but I'm willing to bet that
>Gosnell is an Obama supporter.

First you claim you know, then you state this. Backpeddling again? Duly noted.

>If we were to bet as to whether you are
>a pussy, a yellow-bellied, lilly-livered coward - that was settled
>when you refused to put your money where your mouth is.

Nice try at spinning away from accountability. Won't work with me. You're a
liar. And a troll.

>> >To which your response was to run away. Proof that you are a coward.
>>
>> >> >> >> Watching you and Bax go at each other is
>> >> >> >> like watching two Chihuahuas hump each other's legs.
>>
>> >> >> >Thanks for inviting yourself in you fucking ass-sniffing pervert.
>>
>> >> >> What a loser you are. You're quickly overtaking Spammy as the biggest troll on
>> >> >> Usenet.
>>
>> >> >Says the guy sniffing my farts.
>>
>> >> Troll.
>>
>> >You must like my Mexican food.
>>
>> Troll.
>
>You love my irresistible Mexican food farts. I could put you on a
>vapor trail that leads you straight to the Reagan Library. I'm having
>Thai food today. You'll like that, won't you, Mr. Excited?

You really have a sick imagination. Is that what you do on your spare time?
Sniff other people's farts? You should get professional help and quick.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:42012e5f-86b7-4bab...@fq2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 16, 8:00 am, "Baxter" <baxter.spambl...@baxcode.com> wrote:
>>
>> And the majority of Amerians support Roe v Wade.
>>
>> You're moving the goalposts - the immediate issue is Pancho's claim that
>> court and jury were liberal.
>
>I'm saying even though they were probably more liberal than average
>America that even they have a low tolerance to post-birth abortion.

That may be what you're saying now, but that's not what you have been
saying - and you have zero evidence as to whether the people of Philadelphia
are "more liberal than average America" much less have any evidence that the
jury in this case was in any way liberal.

>>
>> >That is exactly what is happening under Barry Hussein: We have a
>> >strong stock market yet doubled the number of people on food stamps
>> >and have 1/5 children living in poverty and home ownership rates are
>> >plummeting.
>>
>> Your racism is showing.
>
>I didn't mention race, you did.
>
>Again.

No, you just used Dog Whistles - again. You're ashamed enough of your
racism to hide it, but not enough to actually give it up.

[Sancho Panza]

Are you Christian? And if so, does the I.R.S. know that?

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:51951c00$0$20233$607e...@cv.net...

The IRS doesn't care if one is Christian or not - they only care if you're a
proven liar like those Astroturf "Tea Party" groups.

[Sancho Panza]

Oh, the Rev. Billy Graham isn't Christian, now. Neither is the Roman
Catholic church. Good thing that they are as immune to the thought
police as the Muslims.

[Baxter]

--

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:51952721$0$20217$607e...@cv.net...

I'm up for a laugh - do explain why Billy Graham and the Roman Catholic
Church are not Christian. Also explain about the thought police and about
the Muslims.

Personally I think you're flailing and just pulled shit out of your ass to
fling at the wall.

[Sancho Panza]

=======
Try reading your own statement in the prior post, if you can go back
that far: "The IRS doesn't care if one is Christian or not." The agency
certain did care very deeply about the religion in the two instant
examples. Cue the "I'm not following the news" excuse followed by the
"I'll just comment on events that I don't know the first thing about."

[Sancho Panza]

646 N 32nd St. is in one of the 59 districts cited earlier in this thread.

[Baxter]

-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:51952f11$0$20199$607e...@cv.net...

> "Sancho Panza" <otter...@xhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:51952721$0$20217$607e...@cv.net...
> >>

> > Oh, the Rev. Billy Graham isn't Christian, now. Neither is the Roman
> > Catholic church. Good thing that they are as immune to the thought
> police
> > as the Muslims.
> >
> I'm up for a laugh - do explain why Billy Graham and the Roman Catholic
> Church are not Christian. Also explain about the thought police and about
> the Muslims.
>
> Personally I think you're flailing and just pulled shit out of your ass
> to
> fling at the wall.
> =======
> Try reading your own statement in the prior post, if you can go back that
> far: "The IRS doesn't care if one is Christian or not." The agency certain
> did care very deeply about the religion in the two instant examples. Cue
> the "I'm not following the news" excuse followed by the "I'll just comment
> on events that I don't know the first thing about."
>

All you got is j'accuse and no actual proof - certainly none that the IRS
targeted them because of their religion. And you're mixing tax audits with
granting applications.

[Sancho Panza]

You really are clueless, and you're lack of cites, for instance, just
keeps on proving that. Here is a Huffington Post pickup from Reuters a
while ago that once again shows you talking through your hat (or some
other three-letter word):

* Tax status saved churches $145 billion over 10 years

* Complaints filed to U.S. Internal Revenue Service

* IRS received complaints in 2008 election also

By Mary Wisniewski

CHICAGO, Nov 12 (Reuters) - Political watchdog and secularist groups are
asking the U.S. government to investigate whether Catholic bishops and a
Christian evangelical group headed by preacher Billy Graham should lose
tax breaks for telling followers how to vote in this year's election.

Under constitutional protections of free speech and separation of church
and state, churches are free to speak on any issue. But they risk losing
tax breaks worth $145 billion in the past decade if they violate
Internal Revenue Service rules by promoting or opposing any particular
candidate. Other non-profits also have special tax status.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a political
watchdog group, in its complaint to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service,
cited reports of individual bishops "abusing their positions to advocate
against the election of President Barack Obama."

The group's executive director, Melanie Sloan, said some bishops went
too far by saying a vote for Democrats would mean going to hell. "I
don't think the Catholic bishops should be intimidating parishioners to
advocate for any particular candidate," said Sloan.

The Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation complained to the
IRS about possible illegal political campaign intervention by Wisconsin
Catholic bishops and the Charlotte, North Carolina-based Billy Graham
Evangelistic Association.

IRS spokesman Dean Patterson declined to comment on the complaints or on
whether there was any investigation. "Federal law prohibits the IRS from
discussing specific taxpayers or situations," Patterson said.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, through its spokeswoman Sister
Mary Ann Walsh, said it would not comment on what a bishop says in his
diocese.

The Billy Graham group said that its newspaper ads in publications like
the Wall Street Journal and USA Today advocated votes for candidates who
support "biblical values" but mentioned no candidate or party.

The ads, signed by Graham, asked voters to back candidates who support
"the biblical definition of marriage between a man and woman" and who
protect "the sanctity of life," an apparent reference to the group's
opposition to abortion.

The conference of bishops waged a campaign this year against the Obama
administration's health care requirement birth control be covered by
health insurance.

Church doctrine is opposed to contraception as a means of birth control.
Church leaders also spoke out against same-sex marriage but were on the
losing side in four states where the issue was on the ballot.


THE POWER OF THE PULPIT

Nicholas Cafardi, a law professor at Duquesne University who worked for
the Catholic diocese of Pittsburgh, said some bishops seemed
particularly politically active in this election.

In Cafardi's opinion, the bishops' conference did not cross any tax-law
lines but some individual bishops may have done so.

"The larger issue is that, irrespective of what the tax code says,
churches should be sacred spaces, free of partisan politics," said Cafardi.

Among those whose political positions created controversy in this
campaign season was Springfield, Illinois, Bishop Thomas Paprocki who
warned his flock in a letter of "intrinsic evils" in the Democratic
platform's support of abortion and same-sex marriage. A vote for someone
who promotes such actions "places the eternal salvation of your own soul
in serious jeopardy," he said.

Peter Breen, executive director of the Chicago-based Thomas More
Society, a law firm focused on Catholic issues, said the complaint
against Catholic bishops was meant to frighten people of faith from
challenging their political leaders, which religious people have always
been called to do.

"That's not electioneering - it's merely making statements about public
concern," said Breen of Paprocki's statement. "He's not saying vote for
Candidate A as opposed to Candidate B."

Green Bay, Wisconsin, Bishop David Ricken made a statement similar to
Paprocki's in an Oct. 24 letter to parishioners, but later said his
comments "should not be misunderstood as an endorsement of any political
candidates or parties."

In an April sermon, Peoria, Illinois, Bishop Daniel Jenky said Obama,
with his "radical, pro-abortion and extreme secularist agenda, now seems
intent on following a similar path" to that of former Soviet dictator
Joseph Stalin and German dictator Adolf Hitler. The homily is posted on
the diocese newspaper's web site.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State urged the IRS in
October to investigate a Texas church that advised on its marquee to
"Vote for the Mormon, not the Muslim!" - a reference to Mormon
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and Obama, who is not a
Muslim.

Conservatives were not the only ones getting support from the pulpit.
According to an October Pew Research Center report, 40 percent of Black
Protestants reported hearing about presidential candidates from clergy
at church, and the messages overwhelmingly favored Obama.

Americans United also complained in the 2008 election about a North
Carolina Baptist group that invited Michelle Obama to speak at an event
that they said appeared to be a campaign rally.
--http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/13/billy-graham-election-irs_n_2119470.html