Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Buildr vs
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Daniel Roop  
View profile  
 More options Sep 25 2007, 8:50 am
From: Daniel Roop <goofyp...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:50:17 -0000
Local: Tues, Sep 25 2007 8:50 am
Subject: Buildr vs
One of my local developer groups is doing a shoot out of various build
tools.  And the leader has asked me to put together something for
Buildr.  I was wondering what everyone's deciding feature was for
using buildr.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alex Boisvert  
View profile  
 More options Sep 25 2007, 9:16 am
From: "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:16:40 -0700
Local: Tues, Sep 25 2007 9:16 am
Subject: Re: Buildr vs

On 9/25/07, Daniel Roop <goofyp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> One of my local developer groups is doing a shoot out of various build
> tools.  And the leader has asked me to put together something for
> Buildr.  I was wondering what everyone's deciding feature was for
> using buildr.

Compared to other build systems I've used (make, maven, ant) most important
for me was being an internal DSL giving access to all Ruby language features
and direct access to tons of existing libraries.    Beyond Turing
completeness, some build problems rival normal application development in
complexity and I don't like to be short-changed on code structure,
expressiveness, conciseness and abstraction capabilities.

alex


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
hugh  
View profile  
 More options Sep 25 2007, 5:20 pm
From: hugh <hughl...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:20:15 -0000
Local: Tues, Sep 25 2007 5:20 pm
Subject: Re: Buildr vs
I'm using it in a Maven 1 environment on a codebase of 20,000+ files.
Not having to restructure the codebase on a production system is
really nice.  When everything has been validated with Buildr, we can
make the switch to Maven 2 with less risk.

I've had some challenges with building ear files and massive zip
files, but I've gotten past that.

On Sep 25, 9:16 am, "Alex Boisvert" <boisv...@intalio.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google