> It seems that the supported target (or source) datasources for the
> newly added BridgeDb file for Aspergillus niger does not include
> Ensembl though the primary identifiers appear to be Ensembl IDs.
> (http://webservice.bridgedb.org/Black%20mold/targetDataSources)
>
> Is this by design or a defect?
This is actually a defect. It looks like we forgot to store the full
name for the Ensembl Aspergillus datasource, as it is in fact listed as
'null' in that list.
There is a workaround though, you can use the code EnAn, as in the
following example:
http://webservice.bridgedb.org/Black%20mold/xrefs/EnAn/CADANGAG00000001
>
> More generally, is it correct to assume that all the datasources cited
> within a BridgeDb file are supported as source and target datasources
> for an organism?
Yes, at least for all the .bridge databases (which are based on Apache
Derby), that is in fact true.
>
> Thank you.
> Anupama.
>
Our species-specific .bridge Derby databases are derived from the available datasources and links from Ensembl. We have a build pipeline based in their Perl API. The different versions diff per the changes to between Ensembl versions. There is an info field with the Ensembl version for each derby file. Our sql dumps are identical to the corresponding derby files.
- Alex
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bridgedb-discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to bridgedb...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bridgedb-discu...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bridgedb-discuss?hl=en.
>