Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
borland.public.delphi.non-technical
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion String Tests was: Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Santiago Cimadevilla  
View profile  
 More options Feb 10 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: borland.public.delphi.non-technical, borland.public.cppbuilder.non-technical
From: cimadevi...@arsinfo.nl (Santiago Cimadevilla)
Date: 2000/02/10
Subject: Re: String Tests was: Delphi vs C++ Performance Comparison
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

"NeilB" wrote:
>(snip)
>- The Borland products are not so demonstrably superior for N-tier. The
>reliance on CORBA prevents adoption in many (ectually most) business
>environments where COM, DCOM and other MS technologies have been adopted.

 FWIW, I do lots of COM/DCOM stuff in Delphi with little or no
problems at all - I don't see where Delphi is preventing me from
adopting these technologies.

Santiago.-


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2012 Google